- Joined
- Feb 4, 2009
- Messages
- 5,710
- Reaction score
- 25,064
@Lexi, another good catch! You are so thorough. Are you poring over these looking for errors and inconsistencies? Thank you!!!! We are all benefiting from your diligence.
Thank you. This is the first error I’ve noticed that revealed a redacted area.
That three-hour massage where Honey’s assistant, SS, was also going over emails and other work seems important. Ten minutes after that massage, SS left and that was supposed to be the last time they’d see each other in person for about a month. So the massage therapist would have overheard an important discussion between SS and Honey, including incoming and outgoing emails.
Lawyer DH may not be able to discuss his emails and discussions between himself and Honey because they’re privileged, but if the massage therapist overheard the discussion about them she may have told the police, imo.
____________
There’s an earlier affidavit about police wanting to obtain call, data, and tracking information for a number of targeted phone numbers. What’s interesting to me is that they are very specific about certain time periods. So there must be a timeline of events that they were looking into, imo.
Like January 24th to February 4th, for example. The Fifth Estate program featuring KW aired on February 2nd. Maybe some of the warrants were linked to the dates around the filming and the air date of that show. But there are a number of other specific time frames that go back to the summer of 2017.
Screenshots from Sherman Murders Police Affidavit, 10 Jan 27 2019, 1.8MB ∙ PDF file:

Police's court documents for the Barry and Honey Sherman murder case: All in one place
This is a list of all the police affidavits (aka ITOs) used in court in the Barry and Honey Sherman murder case.
Last edited: