CANADA Canada - Billionaire Couple Barry & Honey Sherman Murdered at Home, Toronto, 15 Dec 2017 #24

[Professor Moriarty]

That's interesting. But goes to show that whoever wants to be shown around is not guaranteed to be told about cameras unless they ask or are told. If they ask then they raise suspicions on themselves.

Surely, they only raise suspicions if there is a murder.

 

[INSP MORSE]

Surely, they only raise suspicions if there is a murder.

Yes of course. And how often are murders committed after asking if the cameras are in operation. None because no-one would be so stupid as to ask drawing attention to themselves, before returning and murdering someone.

 

[ldlager]

Yes of course. And how often are murders committed after asking if the cameras are in operation. None because no-one would be so stupid as to ask drawing attention to themselves, before returning and murdering someone.

If everyone here believes potential buyers and other visitors and contractors didn’t know or wouldn’t have asked if the cameras were operating, then who in fact actually knew? It surely can’t be more than say 20 people. Why has an arrest not been made if the pool of potential suspects is so small?

 

[INSP MORSE]

Family

If everyone here believes potential buyers and other visitors and contractors didn’t know or wouldn’t have asked if the cameras were operating, then who in fact actually knew? It surely can’t be more than say 20 people. Why has an arrest not been made if the pool of potential suspects is so small?

Family and maybe some work contractors.

They need supporting evidence to prosecute. You have to remember the TPS screwed up from the outset.

Remember the family hired private investigators and collected information through their own hotline which was separate from the TPS. Then AS put a stop to it and asked for any information they had gained to be shared with the TPS. We dont know if or how much of that sharing took place. It was JS who wanted to control things. It was AS that got the private Investigators on board not JS who would have you believe it was him. AS then put a stop to it. We do not know to what extent evidence may have been covered up by JS or what was or was not shared. It was AS that originally put up the reward money. Then JS jumped on board and raised it. For me it seems that AS suspected her brother and put a stop the their investigation knowing that JS was having too much control.

You need evidence to prosecute. The more you know who knows what then more control you have over covering up evidence creating misdirection. Thereby be tiny details thst sont mean much to the investigators but may mean a lot to someone like JS whom may have been the perpetrator.

The whole thing reeks of controlling behaviour. I have a masters in forensic psychology and have worked with many different people displaying different behaviours.

Notice you dont hear or see anything about Adam Paulin JS business partner. It's like there's been a sanitisation of any information regarding him. Wise move from perpetrators if you want to limit information.

 

[dotr]

dbm

 

[planet]

Yes of course. And how often are murders committed after asking if the cameras are in operation. None because no-one would be so stupid as to ask drawing attention to themselves, before returning and murdering someone.

I think it does the opposite: allows them to blend in. If I was a potential buyer of a pricey property, I would be asking about *all* the cameras, interior and exterior. My security matters.

I assume it's a very typical question for buyers of high-end properties. Someone who didn't ask might stand out.

 

[FromGermany1]

Wouldn't it be incautious to take over the security at my future new home just as the seller had installed it? If I as the buyer plan to install a different arrangement of security cameras than the seller had, I haven't to ask for infos. MOO