- Joined
- Mar 9, 2021
- Messages
- 682
- Reaction score
- 3,589
Suggestion you might try adding Honey to your dictionary, the autocorrect should stop making the change.I know, sorry. But my autocorrect usually changes it. I often catch is, but not always.
Suggestion you might try adding Honey to your dictionary, the autocorrect should stop making the change.I know, sorry. But my autocorrect usually changes it. I often catch is, but not always.
For me, if I see cameras I would assume they are real and working, and would not ask if they are operational.Any perpetrator to be sure when asking about cameras would have to specifically ask if any particular camera was not in operation if they intended to return and murder someone in front of it. That would draw attention.
The house was 30 years old and many many contractors had been involved with it over the years..Hi, I'm trying to find out, since certain individuals are asking about interested buyers or contractors asking if the cameras work, if anyone can remember the name of the contract companies that worked on the Sherman's residence before they were murdered and was there more than one contractor working on different projects ? I remember reading somewhere that Barry had taken some to court over unsatisfactory work because he seemed to litigate in most business dealings. If anyone remembers anything along these lines or am I imagining this possibility or confusing this with a different case. Thanks if you can help.
2017Hi, I'm trying to find out, since certain individuals are asking about interested buyers or contractors asking if the cameras work, if anyone can remember the name of the contract companies that worked on the Sherman's residence before they were murdered and was there more than one contractor working on different projects ? I remember reading somewhere that Barry had taken some to court over unsatisfactory work because he seemed to litigate in most business dealings. If anyone remembers anything along these lines or am I imagining this possibility or confusing this with a different case. Thanks if you can help.
The TPS likely bungled a number of issues regarding the Sherman case from the outset. The current corruption scandal, with TPS Officers charged and alleged to be working with Organized Crime, does not do anything to build confidence either.FBI releases the N Guthrie intruder video the same day they obtain it. TPS waited 4 years before releasing the WM video in the Sherman video. Enough said.
Just for clarity’s sake as this is frequently misunderstood: the Shermans did not get their home for free. This was the cost of the necessary repairs. The money went to fix the identified issues with the original construction. It was not profit in Barry’s pocket.(Snip)
After litigation against the house’s designers and builders, they wound up recouping $2 million of the contracted amount to construct the home, according to a 2006 judgment.''
(Snip)
To assume as you state, would be taking a massive gamble if you were about to murder someone in front today them. Having said that. If WM is the perpetrator then he didn't care about being seen. His face was covered and he wore plenty of clothing.For me, if I see cameras I would assume they are real and working, and would not ask if they are operational.