Cas has options. I can only speak to Ontario. But we have situations where Cas has legal custody that’s standard foster care, kin in care (placed with a family member that has passed all foster home training and home safety standards) or customary care (for indigenous children to be placed with someone that is indigenous that passed all foster home training and home safety standards). The advantage with customer care is a member of the band consults ongoing with cas, in a way bearing witness and making sure cas treats the parents/child fairly and with support. The child can also be kept out of care, kinship out of care, placed with a close friend or family member and overseen by cas and a bit less formal.There is nowhere yet that says they took the child. Only info is from his statement.
However CPS is required to inform him they have the child if they do have it.
Based on what is written that he said it’s not impossible that he saw rumours on social media and went to CPS to check and they just gave him a blanket answer that they don’t provide information about children in their custody.
I understand the reporters being sensitive about the situation but I feel there is some follow up questions that could be asked that would lessen the need for speculation and if he is innocent he would have no issue answering.
Cas is never required to give tell where the child is. The father would’ve been served legal notice though, to tell him they have the child and the emergency custody hearing is within five days in Ontario. The parents have a right to attend that court date and plead to the judge on why the child should be returned to them. CAS will be required to support and try to encourage the parents to rectify whatever parenting mistakes were made in support of child reunification. As the baby is under 6, they only have a year to do this if in Ontario. There’s essentially a clock on the parents or the child goes for adoption. In addition, cas is required to facilitate access visits with the parents IF the parents are safe and healthy to do so. This does not necessarily mean in person visits. This could be a letter or a phonecall.
Globe and Mail is reporting, according to him, that he had a friend drive him to the child protection office to inquire about the child. So that tells me he wasn’t legally served a court date notice as of that statement date.