Ghostwheel said:
Here's my :twocents: on the time issue. Say it is 7:00 am. My clock says it is 7:05, because I keep it fast. My watch says 7:15 because it has never kept time right. My car clock says 6:50 because I disconnected the battery and never got around to resetting it, because it was close enough (and a pain to reset). Right there, you have the whole discrepancy. If you add in that I might have been thinking it was later than it was, it's pretty easy to get the times off. And I'd be surprised if hubby can say what color scrubs she was wearing, unless she wore the same color every day (and there are so many to choose from, now) because a lot of men just don't notice. (That's my story and I'm sticking to it.)
QUOTE]
..........the clocks in our house are similar to yours...........
...my one daughter likes to have hers 10 minutes ahead of time..............so she can hit the snooze button and dream aliitle longer..
...my other daughter has hers 5 minutes ahead of time, to allow herself time to change her outfit 6 times every morning..
..yet...........they both leave the house , like clockwork, at exactly the same time ( by the clock in the kitchen ) every day.........8:29, to catch the school bus at 8:34...
...our clock in the car is not only 4 minutes ahead...( so that we can hopefully arrive somewhere on time).........it's also not set to daylight savings.......an hour off....yet we still know the time...
...if someone leaves EVERY morning at 6:15................then it's 6:15.......
I disagree-the people who own the clocks know how they work- we have not had it reported that it was 6:15 am (but that the clocks in the house are fast.) We are talking about routines.
He said it without blinking..so if her car was seen even at 6:15 then he is lying..but the car was spotted by 5:50-55..that is not a small amount of time.
The car should not have been where it was until say 6:20 or later..thats why his first statement should be taken as a lie. And why would he lie? And if he lied about that then what else is he lying about?
Further he is a military guy-how many military guys do u know who dont know the exact time?
They have a child-what mother doesnt know the time when it comes to what her child should be doing?
If they set their clock ahead-if his watch said one thing and the clock another, then he should have made that clear.
He said 6;15 because that is the time she would normally leave-for all we know she was already dead.
(Now we dont know he is involved, but I think in a missing persons case nothing should be blown off as accidental or coincidental. Every small detail is possibly the answer..and think about Laci- scott said he left the house at one time and they proved he did not-right there he was screwed.
added..and another thing we are not talking about unnecessary detail here-the time is critical - I do not think you speculate about time when a person is missing unless you really do not know for sure. He seemed to know for sure..so her car should not have been where it was so soon..I do not know the time from her house to where it was spotted and I am only allowing 5 minutes. That would be 6:20.
Our clocks are out a bit here and there..but a hospital worker and a military guy are not going to be sloppy about time.
Further- just how you described the time above would tell me that in your case there could be a reasonable explanation for a descrepancy, but that is not what happened here. He did not say- well we set our clock ahead and then her watch goes by hospital time and mine is always set to the radio....so it was sometime between 6:00 - 6:20 am.
He was definite and thats not an accident.