The master bedroom was at the top of the staircase, which is why I always assumed they got behind her on the stairs to take her by surprise with her back turned. That's just how I envisioned it, but I wasn't there -- I don't think anyone can conclusively say where the attack started. Obviously she was killed in the master bedroom since that's where her body was found and presumably where the blood was.
I reread the
Capital Daily article and it says: "The main bedroom was at the top of the stairs.
As Lindsay turned to show the ensuite bathroom, she was stabbed from behind with an edged weapon." I'm not sure how they determined she was killed specifically when turning to show the bathroom since there were no witnesses. Maybe investigators concluded it from where her body was found and blood spatter patterns. It seems oddly specific. Either way, the point is LB was led into a vulnerable position and taken by surprise with her back turned. A lot of realtors lead the way when showing homes, which is why the female accomplice was brought along -- she helped lower LB's guard.
I don't think you need a hazmat suit to kill someone small and unsuspecting without leaving DNA, especially if it's well-planned. The expert panel emphasized this was planned, so I assume the attack was too. Adding another person hiding upstairs just means more people privy to and witnessing a murder and that's a liability. Typically you want in and out, minimal witnesses. Two people can get the job done. Even having a man and woman team was unusual, according to the
Dateline panel. Having a third person hiding upstairs in a hazmat suit just doesn't make strategic sense to me. LB was small, so a man with a knife wouldn't have trouble overpowering her, especially with the female accomplice there to help restrain her if needed.
The panel believing the killers had real estate ties might be spot-on. They knew which house to select: a vacant property where they wouldn't be interrupted. They knew the layout well enough to lead LB to the most isolated part of the house. This level of familiarity
could suggest insider knowledge of local listings as well as even property access.
Also, this wasn't typical organized crime methodology. Hitmen hired by organized crime usually favor straightforward approaches -- catching someone at a restaurant, coming home, getting in or out of their car in a parking lot or parkade. The fact that a vacant house was chosen could signify real estate ties because, yeah, LB was a real estate agent, but it's not the typical MO of the type of people she was allegedly linked to through the Calgary drug bust. There were easier ways to kill her. Stabbing her to death in a staged showing seems unnecessarily risky and complicated. Why would someone take that risk, and why choose that method? I think the answer to that question is key.