Not that it will ever be known, but my working theory is that one of them was the shooter, one was the watcher, ( and incidentally, the admirer) and that's how it ended, too. Still the one shooter, still the one watcher. One a bit tougher, one a bit more squeamish.
They were cold men, able to get close up and shoot a unarmed woman, able to watch this being done. And tootle off for another 500 klms and shoot /watch another elderly man shot. Cold, deadly, intent, …
If, in fact, it turns out they both died of gunshot wounds, that presupposes a terrific amount of organized thinking, to put aside the necessary ammo, and keep the weaponry in good nick, operating smoothly under hard conditions. Kept in readiness for that big exit moment. Maybe they stole a little bottle of oil for the gun at the co-op/hardware store. That would fit in with their final plan.
I am surprised though by no appearance, as yet, of their 'apologia' their 'manifesto' of intent and message. It is hard to conceive that it was all for nothing, yet, that's what it seems to be, so far. For nothing.
They were cold men, able to get close up and shoot a unarmed woman, able to watch this being done. And tootle off for another 500 klms and shoot /watch another elderly man shot. Cold, deadly, intent, …
If, in fact, it turns out they both died of gunshot wounds, that presupposes a terrific amount of organized thinking, to put aside the necessary ammo, and keep the weaponry in good nick, operating smoothly under hard conditions. Kept in readiness for that big exit moment. Maybe they stole a little bottle of oil for the gun at the co-op/hardware store. That would fit in with their final plan.
I am surprised though by no appearance, as yet, of their 'apologia' their 'manifesto' of intent and message. It is hard to conceive that it was all for nothing, yet, that's what it seems to be, so far. For nothing.