Caylee Anthony General Discussion thread #133

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #21
The July 9th statement was redacted when Kio realized that it was another Casey that she spoke to and NOT Casey Anthony. She has two friends named Casey with young girls and it was the OTHER Casey who was trying to leave an abusive relationship that called her about borrowing the money and had the daughter in the background.

Wow - thanks! I read that earlier in the statement but it ended with the investigator wanting her cell phone records so I wasn't sure what the deal was.

Do you recall where you read the statement was redacted? Thanks!

DT
 
  • #22
hmm, that's weird why would she mention it then -you don't confuse two people even with the same name -she sounds a bit dotty

She didn't mention it until AFTER she realized she made a mistake. I would think when you suddenly find out someone's kid is missing that you'd replay all conversations and she remember talking to a Casey, wanting to borrow money, kid in the background and immediately connected it.

THEN when she talked to the other Casey later on she realized she incorrectly associated the two and changed the statement.

I mean, how do you confuse the most critical date in the case...the last day you saw your granddaughter and child like the family did...so...LOL

Besides, this girl seems to be the lone person that actually took investigators somewhere she could see Casey having done something with a body/evidence. It seemed she was trying to come up with anything that might be relevant to the case
 
  • #23
The July 9th statement was redacted when Kio realized that it was another Casey that she spoke to and NOT Casey Anthony. She has two friends named Casey with young girls and it was the OTHER Casey who was trying to leave an abusive relationship that called her about borrowing the money and had the daughter in the background.

Now that is even odder. I find it hard to believe you could mix up friends like that when calling police and reporting that very friend. IMO

I have 2 friends called Cathy, and I can't imagine accidentally calling the police about the wrong one. IMOO
 
  • #24
Wow - thanks! I read that earlier in the statement but it ended with the investigator wanting her cell phone records so I wasn't sure what the deal was.

Do you recall where you read the statement was redacted? Thanks!

DT

She discussed with officers and it was changed in the statement with the redaction. In the long acccount (part 3) it's the page preceding her long statement and in the short account (part 2) it's following the account.
 
  • #25
She didn't mention it until AFTER she realized she made a mistake. I would think when you suddenly find out someone's kid is missing that you'd replay all conversations and she remember talking to a Casey, wanting to borrow money, kid in the background and immediately connected it.

THEN when she talked to the other Casey later on she realized she incorrectly associated the two and changed the statement.

I mean, how do you confuse the most critical date in the case...the last day you saw your granddaughter and child like the family did...so...LOL

Besides, this girl seems to be the lone person that actually took investigators somewhere she could see Casey having done something with a body/evidence. It seemed she was trying to come up with anything that might be relevant to the case

Umm... last paragraph yes that's good, the rest no sorry I would never confuse two Claire's or two Sarah's in any circumstance-my brain doesn't associate people by name but by our history and the feelings I get
 
  • #26
Yeah I can't remember -wasn't he thought to be a fictional person who would corroborate her story?

When the conversation first took place, I figured, maybe Jesse, Tony, Hawkins and other possibilities. LE know lots more than us, and they'd know who Lee was calling. One day we will have more answers.
 
  • #27
Now that is even odder. I find it hard to believe you could mix up friends like that when calling police and reporting that very friend. IMO

Wow, I wonder if someone asked her to say that, and then she changed her mind?? I have 2 friends called Cathy, and I can't imagine accidentally calling the police about the wrong one. IMOO

yes my sentiments exactly
 
  • #28
Now that is even odder. I find it hard to believe you could mix up friends like that when calling police and reporting that very friend. IMO

Wow, I wonder if someone asked her to say that, and then she changed her mind?? I have 2 friends called Cathy, and I can't imagine accidentally calling the police about the wrong one. IMOO

She actually almost didn't even initially call immediately because she wasn't sure she knew anything relevant. Reading both the long and short statements and then one with another friend, and the friend thought it may be important.

I'd suggest reading that whole section of part 3 (although the part about the other friend was in section 2 right before or after the shorter account from Kio there)
 
  • #29
She didn't mention it until AFTER she realized she made a mistake. I would think when you suddenly find out someone's kid is missing that you'd replay all conversations and she remember talking to a Casey, wanting to borrow money, kid in the background and immediately connected it.

THEN when she talked to the other Casey later on she realized she incorrectly associated the two and changed the statement.

I mean, how do you confuse the most critical date in the case...the last day you saw your granddaughter and child like the family did...so...LOL

Besides, this girl seems to be the lone person that actually took investigators somewhere she could see Casey having done something with a body/evidence. It seemed she was trying to come up with anything that might be relevant to the case


And, she might have been a really good friend who didn't want to get her old friend, who she believed to be mentally ill, in any more trouble than she had to. Maybe she realized it was another lie (an abusive relationship), and didn't want to hurt her anymore, just wants to help with Caylee. But your theory is definitely a possibility too! So many possibilities about so many things still.

And now I'm really going to bed! Good night again everyone!
 
  • #30
So after everyone reading the docs what is everyone's take on the Grandparents real involvement? Enough for LE to bring charges on them ?
 
  • #31
Umm... last paragraph yes that's good, the rest no sorry I would never confuse two Claire's or two Sarah's in any circumstance-my brain doesn't associate people by name but by our history and the feelings I get

Not only did this girl allegedly mistake the two caseys, she also was unable to produce the cell phone record after she said she could, and also gave a disconnected phone number for the alleged second Casey..it seems very suspicious in my opinion.
 
  • #32
So after everyone reading the docs what is everyone's take on the Grandparents real involvement? Enough for LE to bring charges on them ?

See I'm not sure what it would be legally, but to me it seems like the state would have to prove that they were intentionally tampering with evidence, ect. I mean even to this point LE is still calling it a kidnapping officially, so how can they charge the grandparents for covering up if they didn't do anything that overtly proves that they had knowledge of a murder, such as moving a body, cleaning up blood, ect. It just seems like there would be too much reasonable doubt there to get the charges to stick without a confession, and you know what they say..the apple doesn't fall far from the tree. I also think it would be very bad publicity if they lost a case of this nature because it would appear the DA was going after the victims of the crime.
 
  • #33
Not only did this girl allegedly mistake the two caseys, she also was unable to produce the cell phone record after she said she could, and also gave a disconnected phone number for the alleged second Casey..it seems very suspicious in my opinion.

Yeah clearly suspect -thanks :)
 
  • #34
I thought she came off as having a bit of grudge against the whole family.
 
  • #35
So after everyone reading the docs what is everyone's take on the Grandparents real involvement? Enough for LE to bring charges on them ?

I've long felt that both Cindy and George were going to extremes to cover up for Casey. They've tried to take control of the situation and have thwarted the investigation by LE. They've condemned LE for not doing what they wanted - looking for a non-existent babysitter.

I also feel that both George and Cindy have been actively tampering with evidence and have given false statements.

I don't think George's recollection of June 16th is accurate. Not many men are going to be able to recall with detail what someone was wearing on a particular day more than a month prior.

I also don't believe the events of June 24th, as described by George every took place. I think that was a lie to cover the fact that he found the gas cans in the Pontiac on July 15th and removed them, putting them back in the shed.

Cindy washing the pants is another example of tampering with evidence, and I think both George and Cindy made an effort to clean up that car prior to LE taking it.

I feel the fact that George and Cindy did their own search of the backyard prior to LE, indicates they knew from the beginning that it was very possible that Casey had harmed Caylee.

I feel that Casey is responsible for Caylee's death, but that one or both grandparents may have been involved in helping to cover up the death. One or both of the grandparents may have helped with the disposal of the body.

I wouldn't be surprised if Cindy or George were charged with accessories after the fact.

Just remembered something..........does anyone else remember the day that George was going off somewhere for the day and he loaded an fairly large ice chest into the back of the car? I just remembered that.
 
  • #36
omg the inconsistancies are mind boggling after reading all those documents.

just a few of the things that stood out and bothered me:

1. where the heck did casey stay on june 9th? ricardo claims she was over at his place. didn't clint say she was over at their place? and where was caylee on that date? that date came up an awful lot. in one of her interviews with LE, casey said caylee went with cindy to mt. dora on 6/8 to see cindy's parents. there IS something about this date. i think they better go back and see if anyone really saw her past this date. and take a hard look at that 6/15 video to see if it is legit.

2. tony getting his jeep fixed somewhere around this same time. hmmmm

3. tony and amy making a point to say caylee was friendly with strangers, especially guys. amy went so far as to say flirtatious. very bothersome statements. makes me think they know more than they are saying here.

4. tony says casey never had a time period he couldn't account for from the time she moved in except while he was gone to ny 6/30-7/5. i would think these ping records between the 6/16-18 might mess that statement up. or was he with her?

5. really bothersome that she told tony and amy that she was soon fixing to take over her parent's home. if i was ga and ca, i do believe i'd be sleeping with one eye open.

6. if tony didn't get back from ny until july 5th, how did she cook for he and clint on july 4th?

7. why was tony wanting to move on 6/19? according to the matthew crisp interview.

8. ricardo said he and casey broke it off friendly and amy said they had a big fight...was that on the 9th too?
 
  • #37
Good Morning Everyone!

All I can say is Wow! We were given a ton of information yesterday and it really appears to be pretty damning against Casey.

When they had her at Universal, there was a time or two that I actually thought she was about to confess.

There are so many contridicting statements that we almost have to pick who we want to believe. I mean everyone could be twisting the true a bit!
 
  • #38
Good morning all!!

What were some of the bigger revelations from the documents released yesterday?
 
  • #39
omg the inconsistancies are mind boggling after reading all those documents.

just a few of the things that stood out and bothered me:

1. where the heck did casey stay on june 9th? ricardo claims she was over at his place. didn't clint say she was over at their place? and where was caylee on that date? that date came up an awful lot. in one of her interviews with LE, casey said caylee went with cindy to mt. dora on 6/8 to see cindy's parents. there IS something about this date. i think they better go back and see if anyone really saw her past this date. and take a hard look at that 6/15 video to see if it is legit.

snipped

I think Clint said Casey was staying at Tony's the second half of June only or was that when he atually moved in. About the 9th he says "Especially with the first date that was said was June 9, her missing, you know? I thought back right away, and I had seen Caylee after June 9, and that's what I told investigators right away, that I'd definitely seen Caylee after June 9. So I knew that date was not true." http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,404241,00.html

weird about the July 4th/5th thing indeed!
 
  • #40
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
124
Guests online
3,353
Total visitors
3,477

Forum statistics

Threads
632,624
Messages
18,629,228
Members
243,222
Latest member
Wiggins
Back
Top