IMO, the testimony about SUBSTANTIAL force knocks back the theory that Christina may have done the deed.
On cross, neck injury not related to blow to the head.
BUT, ME says it's possible it was ONE BLOW. That's pretty substantial.I understand, but swinging a crowbar into someones head is substantial force... whether male or female.
A trained Marine of either sex could use "substantial force", IMO.I understand, but swinging a crowbar into someones head is substantial force... whether male or female.
That's my understanding.You mean the knife wound, right?
BUT, ME says it's possible it was ONE BLOW. That's pretty substantial.
A trained Marine of either sex could use "substantial force", IMO.
Hmmm, wonder how a crowbar could fracture the BASE of the skull? I'm thinking he slammed her into something like the wall or floor. :furious:
I wonder if the defense will offer any theory on that, such as a consensual liason interrupted when they got caught? :waitasec: MOOBothers me that prosecution didn't make a point that she was naked from the waist down.
He could have hit her on the base of the skull with the crowbar to incapacitate her so he could deliver the final blow.
Here's another Marine murder where a similar thing was done:
"Col. Sabow was rendered unconscious or immobile by a blow to the head that fractured the base of the skull . . ."
http://www.salem-news.com/articles/may012010/sabow-murder-ro.php