Thanks!In answer to your questions
What will be Morphew's defense?
How would Suzanne's putative character trait of promiscuity be pertinent to that defense?
Would it not point to the possibility of another perp?
If such a trait would not relate to the defense, how would it otherwise be relevant?
I don’t quite understand your question, but unless it relates to ‘it wasn’t me’ scenario, it would not.
Why did this character trait never come up in the 11th JD prosecution?
The affair was revealed at the PH? I cannot remember what side (probably prosecution) but that is how we found out about JL. I take it you mean why any other possible affair was not raised at that time and I don’t know the answer to that question. However, listening to his current (danish) lawyers podcast/interview and the mention of G and MM1 has made me wonder of the possibility of other affair partners. I also wonder whether the private investigators unearthed anything (about anyone connected to the case).
IMO, a single affair would not be sufficient to establish the character trait of promiscuity. Character evidence is reputational, established through facts and opinions known in the community.
IMO, a single affair would not be allowed to serve as the basis for a speculative argument that there must have been others.
Maybe Morphew intends to portray GD as a potential perp - I think that's a reasonable read of the JFB podcast interview. But he will need to present evidence specific to him, that would lead a reasonable investigator to see him as a potential suspect, and show that LE did not adequately investigate him.
IMO, Kelly and Johnson know about the interview, and they had this covered before the indictment issued.