Yes. The Doc comes with baggage. From the bit I just heard I believe they will decide over the weekend if it's worthy of putting him on the stand.What the heck is going on in the courtroom now. Are lawyers and judge discussing qualifying a defense expert witness?
Thanks for explaining. Jurors coming in now. Are you all watching or following tweet reporting?Yes. The Doc comes with baggage. From the bit I just heard I believe they will decide over the weekend if it's worthy of putting him on the stand.
OK good to go. Watching the wildlife guy. Now I understand why you were discussing coyotes...lol.Mark Redwine Murder Trial WATCH LIVE STREAM
I'm watching here Chelly
Hello, Joining you all trial-watching. Late to the trial and trying to play catchup.
I believe it’s Apker.Watching live on youtube.
First afternoon witness for the defense is Jerry Apcur, (sp?) Area Manager of Colorado Parks and Wildlife, retired. Staff Biologist and Area Supervisor.
Hey geevee! Great to see you too!So good to see you, Chelly!![]()
Thanks. Looks like Prosecution wanted testimony that rodents chewed the earbuds but Court sustained an objection from Defense.I remember during Cory's testimony, that he said he identified them as being Dylan's because he ( Cory ) had given them to Dylan. That was about the extent of any conversation regarding the earbuds. I do not believe they were tested for anything
I'm wondering that myself. He seems knowledgeable.Jerry Apker seems very qualified as a wildlife biologist. Will the defense score any points with his testimony?
Looking at his Linkdin he’s written papers on Cougars, Mountain Lions and Black Bear.Jerry Apker seems very qualified as a wildlife biologist. Will the defense score any points with his testimony?
Is this witness being questioned now by defense attorney? Sorry, I am a practically a newbie to this case.Looking at his Linkdin he’s written papers on Cougars, Mountain Lions and Black Bear.
YesIs this witness being questioned now by defense attorney? Sorry, I am a practically a newbie to this case.
@Cindizzi Many thanks for the update. It helps alot.Mark Redwine trial: Defense begins their case in Colorado | 9news.com
On Friday, Dr. Bruce Anderson, who has spent decades working as a forensic pathologist with the Pima County Medical Examiner's office in Arizona, testified for the defense.
While he agreed that the fracture on Dylan's skull was perimortem, he explained that the fracture could have occurred two to three weeks after his death.
[. ]
On cross examination it was revealed that Anderson had examined Dylan's skull in June 2019 and never looked at any of the prior photos taken by France during her prior examination. It was also noted that he looked at the skull using a microscope that had much lower magnification than the one France used during her examination, meaning she would have been able to look at the markings in much greater detail when she came to the conclusion they were made by a sharp tool of some kind.
"I think eight power was enough for me," Anderson said. "I brought the tools I thought would be necessary to render an opinion."
On redirect, Anderson said he did not look at France's report prior to his exam, to eliminate any potential bias during his own analysis.