The 3 dogs two belonged to the same handler, and one to another.
And the dogs were there on two different days. Which suggests to me the later dog came in to verify what the first two found. jmo
The 3 dogs two belonged to the same handler, and one to another.
Yes, though a clean scent article is always best and ideally if you have to use something that is contaminated like that, then they would need to do a missing member id as well, thus eliminating that other person for the dog.
The 3 dogs two belonged to the same handler, and one to another.
Because the scent articles were not used until later, there has been no mention of whether the trailing dogs had any success or not.
You don't have to speculate if you don't want to, but based on your experience....if DR slept in the house as Dad is claiming, is it still possible that Dad had no viable stuff to give to the dogs?
Due to a complete clearing of the area of the dogs, as well as the surrounding area, no further searches of the lake bottom are planned unless new information is developed.
http://www.pinerivertimes.com/news.asp?artid=1092
I will eat crow if he is in a remote cabin. Between the harshness of Colorado, between weather, wildlife, and just being alone...I find it a very far stretch that he is out there in a cabin. I wish I felt he could be, if even eighteen maybe, but even then doubtful. But at his age, with loving family, I have No hope of this. The cabin would have to be by a stream, he would have to get lucky fishing. He would have to dig his own bait. find his own wood etc. He is thirteen... I don't know what happened, but its been too long. I think that is why runaway is ruled out. Its late fall in Colorado... its nothing nice in the mountains...
I thought the trailing dogs are what led them to the lake.
It could be as simple as what the dogs have trained on in terms of how long a scent article has been in contact with the MP. Other than that, I'm not gonna speculate on that one!
Assuming he actually got on the plane - and AFAIK we have no reason to suspect that he didn't - at minimum there had to have been flight attendants and other passengers who saw him. The last documented time such as on a video would sure be helpful, though.
here we have a statement that the dogs ACTUALLY CLEARED THE AREA OF THE LAKE Thereby concluding the searches of this area for Dylan..so, IMO that means per the dogs there was no scent of Dylan, period..or of cadaver in this particular lake area, no?
It could be as simple as what the dogs have trained on in terms of how long a scent article has been in contact with the MP. Other than that, I'm not gonna speculate on that one!
A statement of facts from LE would be helpful. jm
We just flew this weekend. We flew a major carrier and the stated policy was that children aged 5-14 had to fly with either a parent or an airline employee escort. Not until a child was over the age of 14 could they fly unescorted. The escort stays with the child until picked up by someone authorized to meet the child. I'm not sure if that is a federal law/rule, but I would imagine most airlines have similar restrictions. I cannot imagine allowing a 13 year old to navigate security, the airport, a flight, walking through the whole airport on the other end to get to where non-ticketed passengers are allowed ot wait, etc.
Sorry if this has been mentioned already, I'm a bit behind and a first time poster...