iPod removed from dad's house ......
Watch/listen to VIDEO
http://www.9news.com/news/article/302378/188/Missing-boys-father-denies-involvement
THANKS! I updated the timeline and will have VASportsmom repost soon...
iPod removed from dad's house ......
Watch/listen to VIDEO
http://www.9news.com/news/article/302378/188/Missing-boys-father-denies-involvement
If father threw out the phone, broke the phone, etc, without doing anything to Dylan, why would he then text that phone Monday? It doesn't add up.
IMO, not unless dad had done something more sinister than damage a phone. Why cover your tracks beforehand if you don't know you're son is going to disappear?IF dad damaged the phone and worse he would want it to appear that "life was normal" and have an alibi created. Dad would continue to text, call, go to appointments etc... until Dylan was "discovered" missing.
Sent from my DROID BIONIC using Tapatalk 2
I am 21 next month and I watch an hour and a half of Spongebob Squarepants on Nickelodeon each morning
IMO, It is possible for a 13 year old to be watching the Nickelodeon channel. It doesn't necessarily mean he was watching "Nick Jnr" which has the TV shows for 'very little kids' in which my 3 year old niece enjoys.
:twocents:
The problem I have with the idea of MR hiding Dylan to keep him from ER is why he would choose to employ the scheme within 12-15 hours of Dylan's visit. I don't know when Dylan was scheduled to return to CS but, assuming it was Saturday, wouldn't MR wait until Friday (the day before Dylan was scheduled to leave) and establish an alibi then? Most parental abductions do happen at the end of a visit when the parent fails to return the child to the other parent. MOO
That WE know of... and if LE knows they sure wouldn't tell us!
THANKS! I updated the timeline and will have VASportsmom repost soon...
Unless dad did something to Dylan in a fit of rage. I just don't think it's plausible that dad would have sent Dylan into hiding during his visit when they hadn't had much time to spend together. MOOCorrect. But that didn't happen, Dylan didn't get to spend that time with MR. Or rather MR didn't get to spend that time with Dylan. So if he was disappeared in the beginning, it would make no sense for it to be Dad. Now on the other hand, there reverse could be true since he disappeared at the beginning of the visit.
Why would someone other than MR abduct Dylan and keep him in hiding? Do you think someone was trying to protect Dylan from his dad? If so, was Dylan afraid of his dad?
The problem I have with the idea of MR hiding Dylan to keep him from ER is why he would choose to employ the scheme within 12-15 hours of Dylan's visit. I don't know when Dylan was scheduled to return to CS but, assuming it was Saturday, wouldn't MR wait until Friday (the day before Dylan was scheduled to leave) and establish an alibi then? Most parental abductions do happen at the end of a visit when the parent fails to return the child to the other parent. But, if LE could verify from Dylan's friends that Dylan's visit with his dad was positive and with no forensic evidence to point to foul play, I think there would be less suspicion on MR in that case.
I would love to think that Dylan is hidden away somewhere safe and warm by friends, having the adventure of a lifetime. That's what I first suspected when I read about this case in the news. But, I think with all of the publicity, and knowing how devastated ER and CR are, that someone would have come forward by now.
MOO
We are discussing the scenario in which the phone was damaged but Dylan was fine when MR left for his errands on Monday.
Why would he text the phone in this scenario, if he knew it wasn't operational?
Dylan didn't even know he was going to be there on Monday until late Sunday, when his father told him it was too late to go to his friends at Bayfield. How was he going to pre-arrange anything?
I am 21 next month and I watch an hour and a half of Spongebob Squarepants on Nickelodeon each morning
IMO, It is possible for a 13 year old to be watching the Nickelodeon channel. It doesn't necessarily mean he was watching "Nick Jnr" which has the TV shows for 'very little kids' in which my 3 year old niece enjoys.
:twocents:
Curious about this line of thought. So, if he obtained one (which I am assuming he could have done at any grocery store so he could have a "cooler" phone than his parents allowed) wouldn't his friends have that new number or mention to LE that Dylan called from two numbers?
Wondering what the theories are behind this.
Yes .. Yogi had a good scent article. They can track in amazing conditions with amazing results if they have a GOOD SCENT ARTICLE.
You can't explain to a dog WHICH scent to take off of a couch. But given a SPECIFIC scent .. dogs can track with amazing accuracy..
imo
Remember the flight was delayed for engine problems or something like that so DR came on sunday instead of a day or 2 before like MR was originally expecting him--therefore imo i could see that DR had plans to meet up with his friends Monday already before he left (since he was coming to see his dad earlier before the plane problems and change of flight)-maybe DR already had those plans in the works while at moms house, who knows-maybe DR thought since they might go near where his friends lived he'd try and slip in and have dad drop him off sunday night instead---and MR decides no and wanted to spend the evening whatever with his son--this also makes sense to me of why MR would have scheduled all his "errands" for Monday morning--he himself came into town a few days earlier--wasnt expecting Monday to be the first day with is son--but with the plane delay it was--however, MR already had the errands set up--i think that was good planning because DR was to be at his friends, and MR get his errands done so that he can spend the rest of the week with his son
all my opinion only (and i hope that doesnt sound like too much babble)
I have to say your way of thinking does actually make good sense of how on earth MR would make appointments with his attorney and whatever else. It explains alot.