This is all IMO
People working with LE or not is actually not the point. A guilty person may insert themselves into an ivestigation just to find out what LE knows and doesn't know.
I do find the following things odd:
1)MR does not go out in public or participate in any of the original searches. The search the first evening and then the second search with volunteers. He's staying at home out of the way so that the focus can be on Dylan.
How many of you would NOT help search for your child if you were physically able?
2) MR has changed the morning story 3 times, originally he tried to wake Dylan up but he was out like a light (Durango Herald)
Then he tried to wake Dylan up and he acted like he understood he would be back (not sure which article that was)
Then he tried to wake Dylan up and Dylan responded that "he understood"
3) It wasn't until a week later that MR mentioned a fishing pole, he said that LE was about a week behind and he told them from day one that a Dylan's fishing pole was likely missing. This was about the time that they were bringing in the cadaver dogs & divers.
4) After ER gave a telephone interview with NG, all of sudden his comment (which struck me as typical) he wasn't going to comment anymore because everyone wants to talk to ER and she has all the answers.
Doesn't that strike you as odd? Your child is missing and you are p-o'd that the other parent got/is getting more attention than you did?
It just seems that each time a new piece of the puzzle is given to us (the public) MR has an answer for it. I really am curious about the article in Durango Herald with the text messages, because those plans to see his buddy sound like the WERE "etched in stone"
IMO, the story from MR changes to fit what we learn.
Also the fact they now threw around a football in the evening yet originally on here i read MR said Dylan crashed .