CO- Dylan Redwine, 13, Vallecito, 19 November 2012 - #19

[Eileen730]

Did this guy abuse boys or girls?

 

[Eileen730]

In my opinion only I feel when its a stranger that does this kind of crime the victims are usually found because they do not take great care to hide the body because they usually get out of dodge as fast as they can!

 

[Ryloga]

Very interesting stuff about this BB fellow.
One thing his victim age......13 to 18. How old is BB , do we know?
I only ask because were he a 20 yr old and his victim 17.8 at the time, then
one would wonder about a statutory case, but that would NOT involve kidnapping,
would it? Or an ankle monitor, would it? RSO's tend to stick with one basic age of
victim ( sickos ) so that he previously victimized a 13 to 18 yrs old, then you could assume that is his preferred age group.... meaning he would almost always go for
a victim within that age group. Also as for the ankle monitors, they are only
guidelines. No one sits and monitors them all day long. They are specifically for
if a felon ends up missing,t hey can find them, correct? It's not as if someone gets
a beeping alert that RSO #132 has crossed into the next county. But I wonder if
they 'store' the info on the monitors. Say could they if they wanted to see if this
guys' monitor had him near Durango near Thanksgiving, or not. Does anyone know?
Also do we know if he was in or out of jail at that time? Super strange because
his suicide begs a question........... ' whats the matter rso ' ? If he knew that he
got caught again for another crime or a worse crime, that he would never get out
of prison, that's a reason to suicide.

ETA ... Also on the one hand ,it seems a viable person to look into, it's horrible if so
because A) like posted above, he can never say where Dylan is and B ) in order for
him to KNOW he would be life in prison, he must have done the unthinkable So
while resolution is a good thing, I hope this fellow's not involved.

My apologies if someone else already responded. It looks like BB is 39. http://mugshots.com/US-Counties/New-Mexico/Santa-Fe-County-NM/Byron-Boyd.1563704/details/

 

[MrsPC]

Did this guy abuse boys or girls?

it doesn't really say on the sex offender registry but I found this on newslibrary

Daily Times, The (Farmington, NM) - September 1, 2005

Aztec man allegedly commits slew of felonies
The Daily Times AZTEC -An Aztec man allegedly stabbed his girlfriend before stealing the car she was test-driving, according to San Juan County Sheriff's Department Capt. Tim Black.Byron Boyd, 32, of Aztec, will be charged with armed robbery with a deadly weapon, aggravated battery on a household member with a deadly weapon, child abuse, aggravated assault with a deadly weapon, and battery on a household member, according to court documents.At approximately...

Purchase Complete Article, of 381 words

 

[SCHMAE]

In my opinion only I feel when its a stranger that does this kind of crime the victims are usually found because they do not take great care to hide the body because they usually get out of dodge as fast as they can!

He's out of dodge now. This is curiouser and curiouser. He did not show up for PO on Dec 17. That means between his last PO meeting and this one *( assuming they are monthly) something changed and he felt he better now show up. It could be something as simple as he did some drugs and was afraid of passing a UA , which a lot of PO's give monthly. But he doesn't seem to have any drug charges so perhaps he doesn't have a drug problem. So if we , for argument's sake, eliminate a possible failed UA, why else would you just not show for PO.You know they've got the monitor on you , so you know you can be found in a pinch. Why not show up ?

 

[SCHMAE]

My apologies if someone else already responded. It looks like BB is 39. http://mugshots.com/US-Counties/New-Mexico/Santa-Fe-County-NM/Byron-Boyd.1563704/details/

Gross and good find. tks
So that eliminates , for me, any chance of a statutory case.
No one that age has sex, consensual or otherwise, with a
person under 18 . I just am cautious when reading sex charges
to take into account the age of victim and perp because you
know occasionally a parent will report a BF or GF for being a year
older than their child and get them on statutory. But that is NOT
the case here. tks again

 

[Eileen730]

He's out of dodge now. This is curiouser and curiouser. He did not show up for PO on Dec 17. That means between his last PO meeting and this one *( assuming they are monthly) something changed and he felt he better now show up. It could be something as simple as he did some drugs and was afraid of passing a UA , which a lot of PO's give monthly. But he doesn't seem to have any drug charges so perhaps he doesn't have a drug problem. So if we , for argument's sake, eliminate a possible failed UA, why else would you just not show for PO.You know they've got the monitor on you , so you know you can be found in a pinch. Why not show up ?

I dont think this guy has anything to do with this. JMO
Seems he attacked his own family or the ppl he was with at the time I dont think he went around picking up children off the streets!

The one reason I do not think a stranger did this is NO CELL ACTIVITY from sunday at 8 pm...this to me is when everything happend and Dylan vanished.

Do I want to think Dad is responsible heck no!
But I do think he is!

JMO

 

[SCHMAE]

I dont think this guy has anything to do with this. JMO
Seems he attacked his own family or the ppl he was with at the time I dont think he went around picking up children off the streets!

The one reason I do not think a stranger did this is NO CELL ACTIVITY from sunday at 8 pm...this to me is when everything happend and Dylan vanished.

Do I want to think Dad is responsible heck no!
But I do think he is!

JMO

I agree with you. I totally do. But I have to think if MR is responsible, why hasn't LE found enough on him to pin it to him , yet? Here again, either he's innocent or he's the craftiest mastermind and pulled off a perfect crime. So which is more likely ? If he's so crafty and great at manipulation AND evading detection, why did none of the court cases go in his favor ? Mind boggling the whole mess.

 

[MrsPC]

Gross and good find. tks
So that eliminates , for me, any chance of a statutory case.
No one that age has sex, consensual or otherwise, with a
person under 18 . I just am cautious when reading sex charges
to take into account the age of victim and perp because you
know occasionally a parent will report a BF or GF for being a year
older than their child and get them on statutory. But that is NOT
the case here. tks again

actually, according to publicdata.com....his initial sex abuse charge was filed in 1996 (and his b'date is 1973) so it may have been an underage girlfriend.

edited to add...
and since he had a girlfriend in 2005 (per the other article I posted) I'm thinking his victim was not male.

 

[aust amateur slueth]

Still here, I can't see the point of posting whilst people are ignoring basics such as the no phone activity from sunday night and no contact with anyone since then.

 

[SCHMAE]

actually, according to publicdata.com....his initial sex abuse charge was filed in 1996 (and his b'date is 1973) so it may have been an underage girlfriend.

edited to add...
and since he had a girlfriend in 2005 (per the other article I posted) I'm thinking his victim was not male.

Oh nice find, possibly so.
But I must respectfully disagree on the latter part of your post.
Many pedophiles who target male children live heterosexual lives.

 

[SCHMAE]

Still here, I can't see the point of posting whilst people are ignoring basics such as the no phone activity from sunday night and no contact with anyone since then.

I'm not ignoring that fact at all Aust, not a bit. It just seems to me since LE
is not giving us any new info to go on that it's worth it to explore other
avenues.
My personal opinion is something happened sunday evening to Dylan.
But since that opinion cannot STICK or seems it cannot, I 'm just
looking at anything thrown my way.

Also IIRC LE's last statement has said soemthing like missing since Monday morning, so I am hopeful
that means they 've cleared off sunday evening and narrowed the time frame to monday 730 to 1130.
Perhaps they found evidence in the home or on the pc that confirms Dylan was in the home overnight.

 

[Eileen730]

I agree with you. I totally do. But I have to think if MR is responsible, why hasn't LE found enough on him to pin it to him , yet? Here again, either he's innocent or he's the craftiest mastermind and pulled off a perfect crime. So which is more likely ? If he's so crafty and great at manipulation AND evading detection, why did none of the court cases go in his favor ? Mind boggling the whole mess.

Because there is no crime scene he just went poof off the face of the earth.
I do not think he harmed him at the house nor in his car. but id bet my last dollar Dylan is out there somewhere and its probably close! LE cant do anything as i see it till they find Dylan.
I do not think LE thinks Dylan is alive and thinking this they are in no hurry to arrest dad they will dot all the I's and cross all the t's.
Look at Terri Horman.... Its very hard to prove a family member murdered one of their own because its so hard to get enuff evidence! No strange prints no blood nada zip....

 

[MrsPC]

I agree with you. I totally do. But I have to think if MR is responsible, why hasn't LE found enough on him to pin it to him , yet? Here again, either he's innocent or he's the craftiest mastermind and pulled off a perfect crime. So which is more likely ? If he's so crafty and great at manipulation AND evading detection, why did none of the court cases go in his favor ? Mind boggling the whole mess.

there are lots of ways to commit a crime without leaving lots of forensic evidence...

and in this case, if Dylan's hair, dna, or even blood was found in MR's vehicle...it wouldn't help, because MR is Dylan's father. Of course Dylan's dna or hair could be there in his *father's* vehicle and if there was any blood evidence, his father could simply say Dylan cut his finger one time when they went fishing together.

 

[Eileen730]

Still here, I can't see the point of posting whilst people are ignoring basics such as the no phone activity from sunday night and no contact with anyone since then.

NO phone activity is the huge red flag for me!

 

[JustCryssy]

Right Darcy!
The now famous Amber Hagerman case is a perfect example. For those who don't know, she is the one the AMBER ALERT was named for . An absolute stranger picked her up off the street. It was witnessed . There was never a single second that it was NOT a wandering stranger and he's never been caught to this day. I always wonder if one day they will find this guy or any guy like him and it end up solving dozens of open unsolved cases. We can only hope.

Also agreed it is probably NOT the case here, but it is " POSSIBLY" the case here.

A random crazy person grabbing a child walking/riding a bike down a street in a neighborhood is very different than taking a child in a house in the woods.

This person would have had to stalk MR's house, wait for Dylan to arrive, wait for MR to leave than have to sneak in, grab Dylan, gather all of Dylan's stuff and leave no trace...Oh.. and stolen a fishing pole as an after thought.

The only way they would have known that Dylan was in there was if they knew MR or Dylan's friends... and in that case, they aren't random strangers.

Sorry... it just doesn't fit this case.
JMO..

 

[Eileen730]

I'm not ignoring that fact at all Aust, not a bit. It just seems to me since LE
is not giving us any new info to go on that it's worth it to explore other
avenues.
My personal opinion is something happened sunday evening to Dylan.
But since that opinion cannot STICK or seems it cannot, I 'm just
looking at anything thrown my way.

Also IIRC LE's last statement has said soemthing like missing since Monday morning, so I am hopeful
that means they 've cleared off sunday evening and narrowed the time frame to monday 730 to 1130.
Perhaps they found evidence in the home or on the pc that confirms Dylan was in the home overnight.

I thought they said he was missing monday am because dad says he saw him then LE changed it to Last seen publically sunday ..... I think LE back tracked a bit because maybe there was no evidence Dylan was in that home!
JMO

 

[asyousay]

I just wish that LE had done a proper job and had done DNA testing the first few days .

The bowl , the bed sheets , tv remote for finger prints and so on should of been done straight away IMO

It would of made things different in this case if this had happened IMO

 

[Eileen730]

I have a feeling LE has doubts as to Dylan ever being in the home Sunday night!
JMO

 

[Eileen730]

LE did not make this child vanish.
LE is trying to find this young man and LE is only as good as the info given to them. They will have a hard time finding him if all they have been told are LIES!
How can LE find him if there is NOTHING of this child left there.
I believe LE knows who is responsible and they will get this person. It might not be today nor tomorrow but they will.
I think ER and CR knows also.

All JMO