CO- Dylan Redwine, 13, Vallecito, 19 November 2012 - #25

Status
Not open for further replies.
Here's what I found interesting about CR's statement. You expect an x to say whatever she said. There is bad blood, her son is missing. I think it's almost natural what shes' been thinking or saying she thought. But all this time, I sort of figured CR,, MR"s own son was more in MR's corner. Like ' mom, u know that s not true, yu're just upset, dad would never do that' type of talk. The fact that he's suspicious ( my OWN term here ) of MR makes me think much less favorably of MR. And I wasnt' thinking all that favorably to start with , but was trying to keep my mind open to other options. Now I just don't know.
 
I think she's in the denial stage of grief,

of course she doesn't want to believe, she has to hope Dylan is okay, giving up hope is not possible for her.

I think so to. Considering that originally she expressed a different opinion about MR.
 
LE really needs to make some type of statement. Something! Anything! People are wanting answers. The silence is deafening. It makes it appear as though they are doing nothing to find Dylan or find out what happened to him.

I don't think making a statement here or there that they are 'still working the case' is enough.

I don't think they found any forensic evidence of anything conclusive.
So, what are they going to say?
 
LE really needs to make some type of statement. Something! Anything! People are wanting answers. The silence is deafening. It makes it appear as though they are doing nothing to find Dylan or find out what happened to him.

I don't think making a statement here or there that they are 'still working the case' is enough.


Maybe LE asked them to do interview to provoke a response from MR?
 
The police just issued a press release on Saturday. They've been sending out these press releases regularly, all along. Additionally, they regularly respond to news station inquiries. and these are reported via news articles and videos. Police communications to the public have been several times a week.

I can't reconcile this with all the claims that police are "silent". It makes no sense to me. I guess people aren't reading the news. I don't know.
 
The police just issued a press release on Saturday. They've been sending out these press releases regularly, all along. Additionally, they regularly respond to news station inquiries. and these are reported via news articles and videos. Police communications to the public have been several times a week.

I can't reconcile this with all the claims that police are "silent". It makes no sense to me. I guess people aren't reading the news. I don't know.

I think people want actual information of what happened to this child.
 
All I can say after this new interview is that Mark is not acting like a innocent man !!!

moo, IMHO

Cory made it sound like his father is no longer cooperating with the investigation. Per CR in the video, he says MR "Won't take polygraph. I mean there's a lot of things that he's not doing to help just further the process to get attention off of him." http://www.krdo.com/news/Redwine-fa...ance/-/417220/18076238/-/npdmtsz/-/index.html


I wish the reporter had followed-up and gotten some direct quotes from LE regarding MR's status. If investigators haven't moved beyond MR and Sunday night, then I can't either. They certainly know much more than I do.
 
I don't think they found any forensic evidence of anything conclusive.
So, what are they going to say?

Maybe they do.. I certainly hope they do and are just getting ducks in a row.

Slightly off topic.. the other day I spent a few hours watching 48 hours on cases that I had followed here.. and one of the things that struck me most as they interviewed task force members and LE as they were doing investigations was how much they had in these cases but also how much was needed to progress a case forward (and also how much time it took).

also what stuck out was how little they shared with the public in the above process^^^

That could be what we are seeing here with Dylan's case.

:twocents:
 
I think so to. Considering that originally she expressed a different opinion about MR.

I wonder if her opinion has actually changed, or if that interview was to try and draw MR out, it wouldn't surprise me if LE told them what to say and how.
 
I wonder if her opinion has actually changed, or if that interview was to try and draw MR out, it wouldn't surprise me if LE told them what to say and how.

I am not sure how what she said now would draw MR out, as opposed to what she said before. Seems like the opposite to me, actually.
 
What I gathered from her statement was, it was hard for her to think that a man she chose as her husband and father of her children would be capable of this.

Why isn't LE talking about further searches? If they can't search right now due to weather, why aren't they telling the public this and telling them they will resume searching in the spring or when the snow melts or when the temperatures are safer to send people out?

What are they telling the public?

I understand them not sharing specifics about persons of interest or evidence found, but what are they doing to try to find him?
 
LE really needs to make some type of statement. Something! Anything! People are wanting answers. The silence is deafening. It makes it appear as though they are doing nothing to find Dylan or find out what happened to him.

I don't think making a statement here or there that they are 'still working the case' is enough.

They say they are working "around the clock" but someone who wanted to call in a tip (about a dream she had...) has never gotten through to a live person. She keeps being patched through to an answering machine. (although I kind of understand why)

But I wonder if someone had a "real" (not dream) tip, if they would get to talk to a real person on the first try, or if they would have to leave a message? Because sometimes tipsters are nervous, and if not able to get through right away, may not try again. Idk...

ETA: the thing about the dream tip was on the FMDR facebook page, so it can only be considered rumour that she even tried...
 
Working around the clock means what? What exactly are they doing? People don't see them out and about town working around the clock to find Dylan.

I think the smartest thing Elaine can do at this point is talk to the media. Keep talking Elaine!
 
I don't think anything is going to draw MR out . He has made his stance and I can not see that changing until something pops up that clears him or indicates its him.


MOO
 
I know that any one of us would take a poly in order to "clear" ourselves and demonstrate our foremost desire to find out what happened to our child.

But -- do lawyers advise people not to take them?

I had to take a very thorough and intensive one many years ago. It came back "inconclusive" on several items that, as God is my witness, I was not involved in. However, my anxiety level about taking this test was off the charts. Ultimately I got through it, but vowed never to take one again.

The same way some criminals apparently can "fool" the test (how someone can do that is beyond me) -- I know there are those of us who walk around feeling anxious in general. Though the testers understood my anxiety, they still had to justify the "inconclusive" (i.e. that I may have consorted with communists ... mmhmm...right).

Thoughts?
 
The more I hear and read about him the more I grow to dislike him.

Hear about him where? Reading MSM/LE information, or sheer speculation? If the latter, that's not a very good way to judge a man MOO.
 
I know that any one of us would take a poly in order to "clear" ourselves and demonstrate our foremost desire to find out what happened to our child.

But -- do lawyers advise people not to take them?

I had to take a very thorough and intensive one many years ago. It came back "inconclusive" on several items that, as God is my witness, I was not involved in. However, my anxiety level about taking this test was off the charts. Ultimately I got through it, but vowed never to take one again.

The same way some criminals apparently can "fool" the test (how someone can do that is beyond me) -- I know there are those of us who walk around feeling anxious in general. Though the testers understood my anxiety, they still had to justify the "inconclusive" (i.e. that I may have consorted with communists ... mmhmm...right).

Thoughts?

Guilty people have passed the polygraph. Innocent people have failed the polygraph.

http://antipolygraph.org/ has good information about this piece of quackery IMHO. So did the Penn & Teller "BS" episode about it.
 
I believe that most attorneys advise their clients not to take a polygraph. I could be wrong.

I think Elaine is going to the media out of frustration that she is not getting answers. I don't think her interview was prompted by LE in any way.
 
Yes polygraphs are not 100% accurate. This is why if someone failed or it was inconclusive they would ask them to take a second one.
 
I believe that most attorneys advise their clients not to take a polygraph. I could be wrong.

I think Elaine is going to the media out of frustration that she is not getting answers. I don't think her interview was prompted by LE in any way.

I agree and the reporter who conducted the interview of Elaine and Cory is the same reporter who posted on facebook expressing an interest in interviewing the family.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
95
Guests online
652
Total visitors
747

Forum statistics

Threads
625,980
Messages
18,517,929
Members
240,920
Latest member
LynnKC84
Back
Top