CO- Dylan Redwine, 13, Vallecito, 19 November 2012 - #28

[mijamawi]

Probably the wandering unknown RSO's dna that just happened to be at MR's house and they found it in the search. Isn't it obvious ?

Are we forgetting they've done other searches where stuff was sent to the crimelab? Wasn't there a big search with something like 300 people there?

It's so funny how people can read the same story but perceive it two totally different ways. I guess that's what is so great about WS.

 

[Deleted member 39678]

I know this minute detail may mean nothing. It always has to me from the beginning. In those text when Dylan tells his friend he cant come that night there is a bit of a delay. Then Dylan replies "I don't know". Yet did MR not say later because it was too late. Reasonable I will give him that. Yet he is with his Son. The only Son he seemingly wants to build a relationship with and doesn't know very well. MR gives his Son no reason. Dylan's responses just bothered me from the start.

BBM
Maybe Mark did given Dylan a detailed explanation for why he didn't want him to go visit that night. Perhaps 13 yr old Dylan didn't feel like sharing that in a text with his friend and simply said "idk." MOO.

 

[Bravo]

I sincerely doubt that this is what happened to Dylan's phone. However, the same thing happened to me a few weeks ago. My nearly new phone died out of nowhere and would not charge when I plugged it in.

Just bouncing off your post. I have an old flip phone. Only because as i have stated I dont care about a cell other than Emergency use on the road if alone. Having said that my husband has what I deem a "Crackberry" as he owns a business. My old Phone even if i forget to turn it off. Sure holds a charge a lot longer than Hubby's. Much longer. And we know Dylan had an older phone.

 

[scorekeeper]

<modsnip>

Thank you!

mods, any chance of opening the other thread?

TIA

 

[SmoothOperator]

**playing catch up**

Great. New information that could just as easily be used to draw inferences that something else possibly happened to Dylan is now being fused, fine-tuned, and tailored to implicate MR even more. This is a textbook case of confirmation bias.

It can be called or labeled whatever one would like, the point of importance IMO is that ALL OF OUR OPINIONS ARE EQUALLLY AS IMPORTANT, HAVE A PLACE HERE, AND ARE WELCOME AND ENCOURAGED TO BE SHARED so long as its within TOS.

"Confirmation bias"(or any other label that may be put on "it".."it" quite simply is ONE OF OUR OPINIONS)...it is in fact some people's very honest opinion regarding this case and MR's possible involvement and is within TOS therefor IMO making it just as equally important, valid, and equally due its respect as those opinions or views that are different.

ALL OF OUR RESPECTFULLY STATED THEORIES, VIEWS, AND OPINIONS ON THIS CASE ARE EQUALLY IMPORTANT HERE ..

I see no reason not to ponder the possibilities, but they're not necessarily 'justified suspicions'. There is thus far exactly zero evidence pointing to MR.

again IMO regardless of any label used..anyone and everyone are able to ponder any possibilities they find valid...and those possibilities that are within TOS are not only welcome, but encouraged to be expressed here.. with my posting and expressing a thought/view/opinion I realize that I will have some opinions that are similar/same as mine expressed..as well as I realize I will have replies disagreeing with my thought or point(s) made in that post.

For me no matter what my own personal view is about any aspect of this case I respect every single one of my fellow members views and opinions no matter how different they are from my own..

IMO they are all equal, have a place here, and are deserving of respect for each of them.

jmo.

 

[Seajay]

Where the heck is Paul???!!!! he may be able to sort this out lol Especially for peeps like me. I don't text. I have a cell. In my purse. I don't know my cell #. Nobody has my number (especially work) other than my kids and Hubby. I don't turn my cell on. I deem myself technologically illiterate when it comes to phones. I'm good with that.

In his own way and prior to be verified a communications expert, he's been trying to tell us all this stuff in his own way, using links and everything. He's already put the information out there. IMO

 

[Bravo]

I have spent some time thinking about that detail as well. To me, it could mean something.

However, I also remember being thirteen and sometimes when my mom wouldn't let me do something with my friends (& gave me any number of reasons) when my friends asked why I would say something like "I don't know", "Who knows", "Because I'm never allowed to do anything" in a sarcastic & classic teenager tone (complete with eye-roll). At that age was embarrassing to say that my mom didn't want me to be out too late, or thought I might get into trouble at a sleepover, etc.

I don't know Dylan to know whether this is something he would do, or if this is actually a significant detail in that MR did not actually give the late hour as a reason for Dylan.

I hear what you are saying. I always consider such too. He was a teen and seemingly not too happy about having to see Dad. It just raised my hinky meter. That and the sum of it all.

 

[Seajay]

I know this minute detail may mean nothing. It always has to me from the beginning. In those text when Dylan tells his friend he cant come that night there is a bit of a delay. Then Dylan replies "I don't know". Yet did MR not say later because it was too late. Reasonable I will give him that. Yet he is with his Son. The only Son he seemingly wants to build a relationship with and doesn't know very well. MR gives his Son no reason. Dylan's responses just bothered me from the start.

Or it could be Mark told Dylan why and Dylan didn't feel like relaying that info to R? Because in the big scheme of things, it wasn't important, what was important was Dylan conveying that he couldn't go.

 

[Bravo]

In his own way and prior to be verified a communications expert, he's been trying to tell us all this stuff in his own way, using links and everything. He's already put the information out there. IMO

I am speaking to todays news. Did i miss something?

 

[Bravo]

Or it could be Mark told Dylan why and Dylan didn't feel like relaying that info to R? Because in the big scheme of things, it wasn't important, what was important was Dylan conveying that he couldn't go.

Agree. Again it's never one thing but the sum of it all. For me.

 

[Tonto]

It can be called or labeled whatever one would like, the point of importance IMO is that ALL OF OUR OPINIONS ARE EQUALLLY AS IMPORTANT, HAVE A PLACE HERE, AND ARE WELCOME AND ENCOURAGED TO BE SHARED so long as its within TOS.

"Confirmation bias"(or any other label that may be put on "it".."it" quite simply is ONE OF OUR OPINIONS), or NOT(and imoo its NOT "confirmation bias") is irrelevant to the fact that it is some people's very honest opinion regarding this case and MR's possible involvement and is within TOS therefor IMO making it just as equally important, valid, and equally due its respect as those opinions or views that are different.

ALL OF OUR RESPECTFULLY STATED THEORIES, VIEWS, AND OPINIONS ON THIS CASE ARE EQUALLY IMPORTANT HERE ..


again IMO regardless of any label used..anyone and everyone are able to ponder any possibilities they find valid...and those possibilities that are within TOS are not only welcome, but encouraged to be expressed here.. with my posting and expressing a thought/view/opinion I realize that I will have some opinions that are similar/same as mine expressed..as well as I realize I will have replies disagreeing with my thought or point(s) made in that post.

For me no matter what my own personal view is about any aspect of this case I respect every single one of my fellow members views and opinions no matter how different they are from my own..

IMO they are all equal, have a place here, and are deserving of respect for each of them.

jmo.

Confirmation bias is not a 'label'. It is an observation and a psychological phenomenon. And a factual one in this case. And, for the record, all views and opinions, while certainly welcome according to the TOS, do not necessarily have equal weight within a discussion.

Just clearing things up. IMO

 

[cluciano63]

I am sorry, this "holding" or "hiding" of Dylan makes no sense.
I cannot make it work for me in any way.
No one has ever indicted that MR is not intelligent.
I could see if he had simply gone on the run with Dylan, as many parents have done. But to claim he vanished? I don't buy it. He would know that at no time would the issue "go away" so that he could go live secretly with Dylan. And Dylan is too old to keep under control and away from the world.

Unless he has someone who is keeping Dylan tied up and fed. Who would do that, who would be close enough to MR, could drop off the earth for months, yet not be traced by FBI, and anyway, then what?
Was MR so dumb to think he could not only vanish too, but that Dylan would go along with
it? Why would he? He would have to keep him in chains forever.


It was never going to make ER look bad if Dylan went missing from Dad's care. So there is no motive there.

 

[SCHMAE]

Confirmation bias is not a 'label'. It is an observation and a psychological phenomenon. And a factual one in this case. And, for the record, all views and opinions, while certainly welcome according to the TOS, do not necessarily have equal weight within a discussion.

Just clearing things up. IMO

Again, what other scenarios do you think there is evidence pointing toward? We cannot discuss theories that we aren't privy to . Saying todays' new information could easily point to other persons than MR is a road we should go down. What are your thoughts? tia

 

[SCHMAE]

I am sorry, this "holding" or "hiding" of Dylan makes no sense.
I cannot make it work for me in any way.
No one has ever indicted that MR is not intelligent.
I could see if he had simply gone on the run with Dylan, as many parents have done. But to claim he vanished? I don't buy it. He would know that at no time would the issue "go away" so that he could go live secretly with Dylan. And Dylan is too old to keep under control and away from the world.

Unless he has someone who is keeping Dylan tied up and fed. Who would do that, who would be close enough to MR, could drop off the earth for months, yet not be traced by FBI, and anyway, then what?
Was MR so dumb to think he could not only vanish too, but that Dylan would go along with
it? Why would he? He would have to keep him in chains forever.


It was never going to make ER look bad if Dylan went missing from Dad's care. So there is no motive there.

I agree Dylan being held up somewhere 'hostage' style is the least likely of all the scenarios possibly. But it is the only one that gives me any hope he might still be alive. For that reason alone, I'm not discounting it !

 

[nursebeeme]

I am speaking to todays news. Did i miss something?

PaulR has been verified in this area

 

[nursebeeme]

reminder: the only facebook that can be linked to is the family facebook.. That being said, you can link it and say, "see what is here" etc. The OTHER FACEBOOK CANNOT BE LINKED TO OR DISCUSSED HERE. That means if you are reading over there and want to share something you cannot bring it here.

 

[The Cheese]

reminder: the only facebook that can be linked to is the family facebook.. That being said, you can link it and say, "see what is here" etc. The OTHER FACEBOOK CANNOT BE LINKED TO OR DISCUSSED HERE. That means if you are reading over there and want to share something you cannot bring it here.

I'm sorry, nurse. I thought we were allowed to do that now. I misunderstood.

 

[raine1212]

I would love to hear your thoughts!

Ok, here ya go..JMO and thoughts.. I believe there may have been a argument between Dylan and MR about going to a friends.. Dylan may have gotten hit or slapped and got hurt in the process (led to his death) MR freaked and hid Dylans body.. All accidental..

 

[SmoothOperator]

Confirmation bias is not a 'label'. It is an observation and a psychological phenomenon. And a factual one in this case. And, for the record, all views and opinions, while certainly welcome according to the TOS, do not necessarily have equal weight within a discussion.

Just clearing things up. IMO

My opinion differs in that weight assignment is completely relative and IMO varies due to it being an opinion as well..

my personal weight assignment of certain theories is likely not to match with some others...and gratefully its to each their own and IMO not my place or desire to "verbally" assign weight to other theories...due to quite likely others may have a completely opposite opinion of what "weight' any particular theory holds...

to each their own

Moo is that regardless of what ones opinion of assigning weight to any theory proposed...REGARDLESS THEY ALL HAVE A PLACE HERE AND IMO ARE DUE RESPECT ...whether I agree with it or not...

 

[Bravo]

PaulR has been verified in this area

Yes i saw your post earlier. Thank You. He needs to weigh in for peeps like me lol