CO- Dylan Redwine, 13, Vallecito, 19 November 2012 - #29

[Deleted member 39678]

BBM.
This gave me the heebie jeebies.

It's the new mum. How's it going. I get my first Australian nephew or niece in May. I should say that my oldest nephew married an Aussie girl and they moved to her home town of Perth last year. Sorry for the O/T.

 

[scorekeeper]

BBM
Why wouldn't LE be questioning Mark for hours on end from the very beginning? That's when LE should be doing it not days later, regardless of any claims of innocence that Mark may have claimed. Do we know when and for how long any LE interviews with Mark have been? MOO.

No, I don't have dates and times. I know LE had said they treated this as a runaway initially. They even stopped searching Monday night hoping Dylan would contact someone. I remember Mark saying he wanted to stay home by the phone (even though he has a cell). I agree that LE should have thoroughly questioned Mark initially but who knows if they did. Didn't they say something about how they would probably do things differently now (I don't remember their exact words). I think they said that they began looking at the case criminally the 2 or 3rd day.

Tell me if I am crazy but seems I remember way back at the beginning that MR (I think) said in an interview that they had all met. Seems they were all together at someplace and they discussed what was going on. Did I just dream that or wish it? jmo

I believe Cory, Mark and another son met somewhere.

 

[Tonto]

YES, it IS his duty, as a father, to get himself cleared immediately, so LE can turn to other suspects.

Hard to be cleared when you were the last person to see him and there are no other leads or suspects. As such, he will live with being this person until Dylan is found one way or the other.

If he is innocent, then he should be able to pass the lie detector test successfully. The fact that he is afraid to retake it is very telling and suspicious, imo.

You're basing this on the assumption that he has been asked to take another lie detector test. You're also basing it on the assumption that he failed the first one or it was in fact inconclusive. You know none of this. Pure speculation.

Finding Dylan should be his number one priority. He keeps saying that he wants t leave it up to LE to do their job. If so, he should agree to retake the poly, so they can move on from him. JMO

Again, you're going to have to show me a link to where LE has admitted asking him to take or retake a polygraph. Also, if Dylan were the number one priority of some of the other actors in this play, perhaps they would move on to other suspects when pretty much everything MR has said has either checked out or is impossible to verify. There is no evidence that MR planned or committed a crime outside of the fantasies of those who think he did despite knowing the facts don't support it thus far.

 

[mijamawi]

BBM.
This gave me the heebie jeebies.

O/T how are things going? I'm so glad to see you around.

 

[katydid23]

Hard to be cleared when you were the last person to see him and there are no other leads or suspects. As such, he will live with being this person until Dylan is found one way or the other.




You're basing this on the assumption that he has been asked to take another lie detector test. You're also basing it on the assumption that he failed the first one or it was in fact inconclusive. You know none of this. Pure speculation.




Again, you're going to have to show me a link to where LE has admitted asking him to take or retake a polygraph. Also, if Dylan were the number one priority of some of the other actors in this play, perhaps they would move on to other suspects when pretty much everything MR has said has either checked out or is impossible to verify. There is no evidence that MR planned or committed a crime outside of the fantasies of those who think he did despite knowing the facts don't support it thus far.

I am taking Cory at his word. He has his little brother's best interests at heart, imo.

And, imo, the facts DO support the suspicions that MR could be involved.

 

[Deleted member 39678]

Investigators concluded their search of the home of Mark Redwine, father of 13-year-old Dylan Redwine, Thursday night after serving a search warrant in the morning.

Mark Redwine also agreed to give an official interview to the task force for the case — comprised of agents from the La Plata County Sheriff’s Office, Durango Police Department, Bayfield Marshals Office, FBI and Colorado Bureau of Investigation — after investigators asked if he would be willing to do an in-depth interview, said Lt. Ray Shupe, spokesman for the task force.

Redwine has given several cursory interviews in the past, but this was the first in-depth interview he has given, Shupe said. No attorney was present for the interview, and Shupe said Redwine has not retained an attorney.

Redwine has been cooperating with authorities and has not been named a suspect or a person of interest, Shupe said. http://www.cortezjournal.com/article/20121130/NEWS01/121139955/Redwine-gives-official-interview

Thanks for the link. It appears that LE waited a week and a half before doing an "in-depth" interview. If an "in-depth" interview is a long drawn out one where the investigators go over everything multiple times, then it should have been done much sooner in my opinion.

Now I want to know what a "cursory" interview is.

MOO.

 

[FruitTingles]

It's the new mum. How's it going. I get my first Australian nephew or niece in May. I should say that my oldest nephew married an Aussie girl and they moved to her home town of Perth last year. Sorry for the O/T.

How exciting are they going to find out the sex? I hope everything goes well for them!

O/T how are things going? I'm so glad to see you around.

Things are ok thank you for asking. It is exhausting. But it's good to be here for a little while.
Anaya was awake for 7 hours last night. This will get better, right? lease:
(Sorry for O/T)

 

[dlc]

Because he doesn't have to. He is cooperating with LE and is on advice of counsel. It isn't his duty to continually implore his innocence to someone who clearly doesn't believe him. It is CR's problem if he doesn't believe MR - not the other way around.

True enough. But then he shouldn't be surprised, offended, or upset about their opinion of him...nor should he be upset about the public's perception of his involvement. As most of us continue to point out, he only has himself to blame. If he is ok with all of this, fine. But he obviously isn't because he said so.

JMO and MOO

BBM

I was thinking about this last night. I really hope that MR doesn't have people around him encouraging him to continue to pursue this "I don't have to and you can't make me" path, because it's been mighty poor advice (IMO). People are absolutely correct in contending that he has no legal obligation at present to do anything more than he's doing, and should this case ever go to trial, the Fifth Amendment ensures that he can continue to do the same. (His moral obligations are a different matter.)

However, I do believe that it's disingenuous to assert that such behavior won't result in exactly the kind of reaction from many people that he's currently receiving. If you pick up your son for a court ordered visitation, and he disappears within hours of your doing so, and you dodge and avoid questions until your ex-wife calls you out a week later, and then you fail to actively participate in searches, fund-raising, interviews, etc., or to initiate some other kind of activity of your own, people are going to speculate -- people in your town, in the media, and on boards like this.

That comes with the territory you've staked out for yourself.


JMO, IMO, etc.

 

[Seajay]

I tend to agree with you in part. But I think if you're married to someone for 10 or 15 years or a pretty long time, that if you could see them face to face, you could tell a lot by their mannerisms. I think if they sat down that ER might leave there feeling like ' ok he 's told me the truth ' just because of their history together. That would bring her some peace and then they could decide what to do going forward.

Ok, so say they meet face to face, they sit down and she asks her question and he answers her, she reads his body language and mannerisms that's he's telling the truth. Then what??? She's not going to get all warm and fuzzy and go back to ABC GMA and retract her statements. I don't think she's going to backtrack on anything she said at this point. I don't see it. I don't think anything he tells her will make a difference, which is probably what he already figured out. IMO

 

[cluciano63]

For whatever reasons, and completely beyond any imaginable to me, LE did not conduct a forensic search of the home until the Thursday of the following week, ten days later. I do not think they can overcome that hurdle, as far as proving Dylan was there, proving any parts of MR's claims about cereal bowls and Nickelodeon and etc. Waiting this long boggles my mind and makes me worry about ever having a resolution.

 

[Tonto]

To add another dynamic - if I were guilty of this, I certainly wouldn't be acting like I was. I would be out in front of every camera shedding every crocodile tear under the sun. Why would I be confident enough in my ability to get away with it that I purposely allow everyone to suspect me? Makes little sense.

Perhaps instead he is confident that he will ultimately be vindicated.

 

[Seajay]

Even though it's said he doesn't have a lawyer, I remember it being in MSM that he consulted one at one point to watch is back or to take care of the accusations or whatever. That's not the point, the point is, I wonder if he was advised then not to talk to them, after the accusations, maybe he was legally advised not to talk to ER or CR about this any further then he laready told police.

 

[scorekeeper]

Authorities executed an extensive search warrant Nov. 29 at the father’s home.


Several forensic test results have been returned, and the Sheriff’s Office is working jointly with the FBI to review the results, Bender said. Additional interviews are being conducted both locally and outside the region, he said.

http://durangoherald.com/article/20...tigators:-'We-want-to-leave-no-stone-unturned'

BBM

I take this to mean based on the test results they received, they are going to be doing additional interviews. Don't know if that means for people they previously interviewed or people they have never interviewed...or both

 

[Deleted member 39678]

For whatever reasons, and completely beyond any imaginable to me, LE did not conduct a forensic search of the home until the Thursday of the following week, ten days later. I do not think they can overcome that hurdle, as far as proving Dylan was there, proving any parts of MR's claims about cereal bowls and Nickelodeon and etc. Waiting this long boggles my mind and makes me worry about ever having a resolution.

I agree. I remember hearing about the long wait before getting a search warrant for an intrusive search of Marks home, but I didn't now about a long delay in doing an "in-depth" interview.

Why did LE drag their feet? Not good in my opinion.

 

[deoneta]

I am taking Cory at his word. He has his little brother's best interests at heart, imo.

And, imo, the facts DO support the suspicions that MR could be involved.

ER and CR certainly believe MR has taken a poly and that those results were inconclusive. Does anyone believe this is something they simply made up to throw suspicion on Mark? True or not, this information came from someone. LE is well aware of what is being said in interviews and written on facebook. IMO, if this is false information, LE should correct this misapprehension because it could hinder the investigation. A public which suspects Mark is much less likely to look for a possibly live child or to report suspicious behavior. I don't know if it's true that Mark has taken an LDT and has been asked to take another, but I do believe ER and CR are sincere in their statements. All MOO.

 

[Confusion]

Is it possible that they did take the cereal bowl and whatever else was said to be left behind when they did their initial search? I don't remember hearing one way or the other about it. I know they said they looked through the house, would they take anything that day without a SW?

 

[Deleted member 39678]

Even though it's said he doesn't have a lawyer, I remember it being in MSM that he consulted one at one point to watch is back or to take care of the accusations or whatever. That's not the point, the point is, I wonder if he was advised then not to talk to them, after the accusations, maybe he was legally advised not to talk to ER or CR about this any further then he laready told police.

It could have been advice from a lawyer not to talk to Elaine or Cory after they accused him or maybe a friend recommended to him not engage them in any kind of verbal sparing. If it did happen I'm not sure if that wasn't bad advice. MOO.

 

[cluciano63]

I agree. I remember hearing about the long wait before getting a search warrant for an intrusive search of Marks home, but I didn't now about a long delay in doing an "in-depth" interview.

Why did LE drag their feet? Not good in my opinion.

Especially since they have said they considered a crime had occurred within two days or so. I do not understand how another week was allowed to elapse before beginning these parts of the process.

 

[Angelonline]

Is it possible that they did take the cereal bowl and whatever else was said to be left behind when they did their initial search? I don't remember hearing one way or the other about it. I know they said they looked through the house, would they take anything that day without a SW?

I wouldn't think so. I don't think it can be used as evidence unless obtained with a warrant, so IMO they did not take anything prior to the search on the 29th. JMO

 

[Confusion]

Originally Posted by RANCH
I agree. I remember hearing about the long wait before getting a search warrant for an intrusive search of Marks home, but I didn't now about a long delay in doing an "in-depth" interview.

Why did LE drag their feet? Not good in my opinion.

Maybe it was because something had led them to believe someone else might be responsible?