CO- Dylan Redwine, 13, Vallecito, 19 November 2012 - #32

[Dee10]

I sent a tweet asking if LE has asked for the tape? No answer yet.

 

[Eileen730]

Who would be there to stop Dylan leaving as he is not a child ?

Well hes 13 and hes alone.
Not sure if he can just walk out!

 

[scorekeeper]

that was me who asked her those questions....I cannot believe that law enforcement were not provided with the interview...that knocks me over...perhaps law enforcement first has to get a warrant?

I figured it was a fellow WSer!! I would hope LE would want the tapes as part of their investigation. I believe they would need/want a SW to keep things/evidence legal.

 

[asyousay]

Well hes 13 and hes alone.
Not sure if he can just walk out!

Thanks

it is another country's do different things as over here he would be perfectly entitled to leave the airport unless he had flown and he was being looked after by somebody as some children are on flights.

 

[Psychic Sleuth]

Yes at the age of 13 he could just walk off the plane. You have to pay extra to have a child accompanied by airline personnel. When my daughter was young I didn't have to pay extra and it was nice because they kept very tight tabs on her and would only release her to the person I designated on the other end and that person had to show ID. I think they do that up to age 12 (if I'm not mistaken).

 

[asyousay]

Yes at the age of 13 he could just walk off the plane. You have to pay extra to have a child accompanied by airline personnel. When my daughter was young I didn't have to pay extra and it was nice because they kept very tight tabs on her and would only release her to the person I designated on the other end and that person had to show ID. I think they do that up to age 12 (if I'm not mistaken).

Thank you

This is what I thought .

 

[Tennlyn]

Wasn't it said that MR still owned his last home and that it was a rental property? Maybe that was a rumor, and not confirmed? I can't seem to keep anything straight anymore in this case. If true, surely that was checked out.

IMO, the family currently renting the other property are innocent victims of circumstance (there are rumors they've been harassed, had trespassers, etc.). I have no doubt that LE has done their job with regard to searching it. :moo:

 

[AnonymousD]

Question?
Him being 13 can he leave the airport alone or does dad have to be in the terminal to get him? I would hope someone has to be there.

According to United Airlines, at 13, you can fly as an adult or an unaccompanied minor.

http://www.united.com/web/en-US/content/travel/specialneeds/minors/default.aspx

Children ages 12 to 17 have the option to pay the fee and use the unaccompanied minor service or they may travel as adults with no unaccompanied minor service provided.

If whomever paid for his airline ticket did use the unaccompanied minor service, then whatever information was provided to the airline (about who was going to pick up DR) had to match the ID of that person shown to pick him up.

Goodness, that was tongue tying. Did that make sense?

EXAMPLE (I'm not saying this is how it went down): ER paid for the airline ticket as DR being an unaccompanied minor. She gave MR's info as who was picking up DR, then only MR could pick up DR. & That would have to be verified by an airline representative before DR would be "released".

 

[Eileen730]

Thanks

it is another country's do different things as over here he would be perfectly entitled to leave the airport unless he had flown and he was being looked after by somebody as some children are on flights.

Here its 15 I believe they have to pay extra to let the child fly alone. And they need to be escorted to the parent or to thenext flight they are bookd on.

So Dad would have to park and come inside I believe and meet them at the gate.

but that JMO

 

[Eileen730]

IMO, the family currently renting the other property are innocent victims of circumstance (there are rumors they've been harassed, had trespassers, etc.). I have no doubt that LE has done their job with regard to searching it. :moo:

MR wouldnt take him to a house anyone knew about!

 

[SCHMAE]

I remember in the Lisa Irwin investigation, LE subpoenaed the raw footage from interviews. The TV station sought an injunction to block the subpoena, but LE did get the footage. It wasn't immediately after the interviews though. Maybe these things take more time than we think to accomplish. I tend to think in NCIS time, and I don't think that's very realistic.

Maybe LE knows it's going to be available publicly soon so why waste a subpoena and why tip their hand if they really want it ?

 

[Eileen730]

Maybe LE knows it's going to be available publicly soon so why waste a subpoena and why tip their hand if they really want it ?

I would think they would like to see it before the public does!

 

[nursebeeme]

I would think they would like to see it before the public does!

the media doesn't roll that way Eileen.

If the cops want raw interview footage the media will be screaming at the top of their lungs about it and their legal department will demand a subpoena:twocents:

 

[Dee10]

Maybe LE knows it's going to be available publicly soon so why waste a subpoena and why tip their hand if they really want it ?

That's a good point, after they see it online & if they decide to subpoena it will really be telling that someone's version is different from what LE was told previously. I also believe they would schedule another interview.

 

[scorekeeper]

Maybe LE knows it's going to be available publicly soon so why waste a subpoena and why tip their hand if they really want it ?

As they previously stated, they (LE) are not going to show/play all their cards.

I hope with the release of the full videos that it does help with finding Dylan.

Hopefully, the heat is on.....

 

[SuperMom1995]

No Diff home with no one there.
I thought someone said he used to take the boys to his bosses house and hide them from Elaine whats to say he didnt pull this trick again.

I want to think this boy alive out there but its very hard to think of a how could he be alive scenario.

Yes, I am not disagreeing...maybe a friend or person close to MR who would help him. IMO I don't think DR would stay somewhere by himself without trying to get away.

 

[Psychic Sleuth]

Any word on the 2nd polygraph? I wouldn't imagine it would take long to get that set up.

 

[azgrandma]

I tried to catch up but after seeing that the last thread had some 30 pages to be read, I gave up for now and will go back later.

FWIW, IMO, MOO, O/T
I believe that once something is stated enough times, it's believed to be fact. I'm not attacking anyone, it just seems to be human nature. Here are some of the examples that I am referring to:

No cell phone reception at MR's home - it's never been confirmed or denied either way. ER stated in the NG interview that they had trouble with some calls but never with texting. People posted on FB right outside MR's house and other WS'ers tried with success and without success to use their phones right out in front of MR's home. So, to assume that there is NO cell service is sort of IMO making the evidence fit the crime.

MR is an alcoholic - nothing confirming or denying that either way. The DV reports indicate he had been drinking that night, but drinking one night does not make you an alcoholic

DR's last communication was with an ipod, that has not been confirmed by anyone, it's been assumed by many but not confirmed. If it has been confirmed, can someone provide a link please tia.

Fishing pole was missing - that is MR's statement and nobody has confirmed that, even he said it was likely a pole was missing. The fishing pole that was found at the lake was claimed by the owner.

Sweatpants at MR's were DR's - a reporter saw sweatpants or clothing and it's been assumed that because the reporter stated, that those were Dylan's. Reporters make assumptions all the time and neither MR or ER have confirmed or denied that those clothes were DR's. Not only that, if they were DR's then why weren't those used for scent items?

My point is, that even we are confusing the facts. There are so many wonderful theories from everyone. IMO they have allowed us all to think outside the box.
I respect everyone's opinion, thought, input, all of it. I just get confused when I read something as fact that hasn't been determined yet. We need a cheat sheet to keep it all straight

Does anyone have a link that mentions watching a movie? At one point on here I saw that it was one movie than I saw another title.

 

[scorekeeper]

Any word on the 2nd polygraph? I wouldn't imagine it would take long to get that set up.

Sure MR is working on that appointment right along with the mediation meeting.....

I hope you aren't holding your breath...:what:

 

[nursebeeme]

the only people talking about second polygraphs is ER and MR offered to take one.
I have not read a thing where LE says they would like to do a second one.

:twocents:

so they may or may not even want to give the man a second polygraph. :moo: