CO- Dylan Redwine, 13, Vallecito, 19 November 2012 - #35

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #661
Looking at MR from the beginning til now...IMO, I still believe he's enjoying this.

In the beginning he was practically invisible...not speaking to ER or CR or the media, but then as more time elapses and he sees that no arrest is made he's feeling more confident and speaking out more...but when it comes to details & timelines he talks in circles... and then talking about Dylan hitchhiking and "never met a stranger" he's promoting that Dylan just took off with someone. And somehow he always manages to get in some sort of "dig" or what seems to be a deliberate word or statement to antagonize ER. It's almost like he's feeling cocky now.

I've always wondered if when someone gets away with a crime or if they think they've gotten away with a crime if it sort of empowers them...like Drew Peterson.

IMO, that's what's happening before our eyes in this case.

I was just thinking the same thing. IF he did it and LE keeps saying they have no idea what happened and no suspects would he now be starting to feel a little confident and cocky? I hope so. That's usually when people let their guard down and screw up.
 
  • #662
awesome post AzGrandma
 
  • #663
Yep, and this could break. this. case.!!

Something is very very wrong here. Very wrong. Back to sitting on my hands. I might have to put myself in a straight jacket before the day's over.

TC I simply had to give you one of my designer straight jackets after this comment. (Note: spelling is TM'd).

I found it useful in the Amanda Knox thread, they are limited in supply, there are all the rubber amenities one could wish for, including an asylum, in the Caribbean on a private island.

:giggle:
 
  • #664
One would think so yes. But what if they somehow felt something they said was taken out of context and caused this event to transpire? Then they would feel indirectly responsible. I wish I could explain my thinking more. I have family members who would pull something like this and not think twice about it. Maybe that is why I just see things differently. MOO


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

Considering a family member having your child and keeping your child from you, I personally can't imagine a parent feeling so much responsibility that they would allow it continue instead of telling LE. It's your child. I personally could give a rats arse if I offended every single one of my family members by having their homes searched and alibis verified. They could either get over it, understand it or deal with it on their own. It's my child and that is a stone that I would turn over immediately!
 
  • #665
Agreeing with AZGrandma, one has to make a lot of excuses, or ignore what we do know, to come to many other conclusions than that something very bad has happened to Dylan, and that it might well have happened between 9:37pm on Sunday, and whatever time MR is alibied in town. At least, nothing at all rules out this possibility.
 
  • #666
Looking at MR from the beginning til now...IMO, I still believe he's enjoying this.

In the beginning he was practically invisible...not speaking to ER or CR or the media, but then as more time elapses and he sees that no arrest is made he's feeling more confident and speaking out more...but when it comes to details & timelines he talks in circles... and then talking about Dylan hitchhiking and "never met a stranger" he's promoting that Dylan just took off with someone. And somehow he always manages to get in some sort of "dig" or what seems to be a deliberate word or statement to antagonize ER. It's almost like he's feeling cocky now.

I've always wondered if when someone gets away with a crime or if they think they've gotten away with a crime if it sort of empowers them...like Drew Peterson.

IMO, that's what's happening before our eyes in this case.
I think that people do get a false sense of security and believe that they got away with it. Then they get drunk and talk. :what:
 
  • #667
Considering a family member having your child and keeping your child from you, I personally can't imagine a parent feeling so much responsibility that they would allow it continue instead of telling LE. It's your child. I personally could give a rats arse if I offended every single one of my family members by having their homes searched and alibis verified. They could either get over it, understand it or deal with it on their own. It's my child and that is a stone that I would turn over immediately!

Going off something you said earlier and what I also said, what if they did tell the police of their suspicions and they were followed up on but there was no evidence? What if that person is in the public eye and does have them securely spirited away somewhere remote? Anything is possible. The lack of evidence indicates Dylan knew the abductor and possibly left willingly under the impression of getting a ride into town. Who that abductor is we don't know. I think the theories we have all discussed have elements of truth in them. I think if Dylan is ever found and the "case" solved the circumstances will be stranger than we have imagined.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
 
  • #668
BBM - are you saying that Dylan may not have a choice to go home or not, but he has access to read news, watch news, follow fb, all that and can't communicate? Doesn't make sense IMO. I can't see a 14 yo boy viewing the pain his mother is in and saying, oh well, when they stop arguing I'll come home.

IMOO - Mark is doing what he does best, coming up with excuses. <Mod Snip>. IMO MR is giving an excuse for Dylan's disappearance and allowing ER to absorb some of the responsibility.

Nothing he says makes any sense. I'm starting to wonder if he's losing it.


I just shake my head...

OH, this just makes me SO ANGRY that I'm shaking (not just my head..) I guess we could give him the benefit of the doubt since he's obviously been drinking (slurring and swaying on his feet). But to insinuate that Dylan will come home when his mother and father are getting along better??? I seriously CAN NOT FATHOM that people are still making excuses for this man.
He is sick, and IMOenough so to HARM THAT BOY.
 
  • #669
Well why wouldn't he, he's blamed ER and CR all he can, so it's Dylan's turn.

To be fair here the blame game has been from ALL parties.
 
  • #670
Going off something you said earlier and what I also said, what if they did tell the police of their suspicions and they were followed up on but there was no evidence? What if that person is in the public eye and does have them securely spirited away somewhere remote? Anything is possible. The lack of evidence indicates Dylan knew the abductor and possibly left willingly under the impression of getting a ride into town. Who that abductor is we don't know. I think the theories we have all discussed have elements of truth in them. I think if Dylan is ever found and the "case" solved the circumstances will be stranger than we have imagined.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

How is that possible in a real world? I presume all their relatives are accounted for. Why in the world would some relative kidnap a 13 year old and keep them "somewhere remote?" That's beyond belief.
 
  • #671
  • #672
~Respectfully snipped ~

This, to me, is the odd part of that statement. It is a concern that where ever Dylan is, this bickering between ER & MR could be used against Dylan is a mean spirited way by some abducter - which to me is what MR is trying to say in the first part of the statement. BUT then he puts it squarely on Dylan by saying "who knows ......" What the he&** does that mean?

Very odd thing to say.

Salem

It's like he thinks he IS DYLAN... projecting the words/thoughts that are in his own mind and saying they are Dylan's thoughts.
 
  • #673
How is that possible in a real world? I presume all their relatives are accounted for. Why in the world would some relative kidnap a 13 year old and keep them "somewhere remote?" That's beyond belief.

How do friends, nannies, strangers or family members abduct children in broad daylight without a trace who then turn up alive and well up to 15 years later? It happens more than people want to believe. In saying that, it could also be a close family friend who did this. I think I've known too many malicious and crazy people in my life which leads me to these scenarios. I have an aunt who would do something like and her daughters, my cousins have done heinous things Involving their children to either milk the system or spite someone in the past. No I wouldn't put it past someone to do something as unthinkable as this type of scenario if they were very determined and felt very passionately about taking Dylan away from his fighting parents. MOO


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
 
  • #674
Ok someone clarify this for me. He is saying that both parents agree that Dylan would not run away correct? And in the prior interview he was also asking Dylan's abductor to dump him at Walmart etc. And he stated early on that he thought Dylan was abducted and was nowhere in the area. But now he's saying he's concerned that Dylan may now be choosing not to come because of the bickering going on between his parents?

Is this what this man is trying to say here?

Maybe he is trying to state that there could of been one scenerio, that turned into another scenerio which quite frankly could be the case.

The problem once again is that Dylan is not the focus.

Until the families and outsiders start making DYLAN the focus we may as well close this dang thread, especially when people are now questioning LE's motive in looking for an individual.

This is long past the 3 ring circus.
 
  • #675
  • #676
I wish the interview wasn't so edited and snipped. It is obvious there are sentences in between these statements we do not see...
 
  • #677
It's like he thinks he IS DYLAN... projecting the words/thoughts that are in his own mind and saying they are Dylan's thoughts.

WOW I never thought of it that way! That sorta makes sense because he has said a few times afterwards that who knows what goes through the mind of a 13 yo.

I think it was when MR mentioned that Dylan could have hitchhiked and had nothing to run away from.

Interesting, thank you.
 
  • #678
How do friends, nannies, strangers or family members abduct children in broad daylight without a trace who then turn up alive and well up to 15 years later? It happens more than people want to believe. In saying that, it could also be a close family friend who did this. I think I've known too many malicious and crazy people in my life which leads me to these scenarios. I have an aunt who would do something like and her daughters, my cousins have done heinous things Involving their children to either milk the system or spite someone in the past. No I wouldn't put it past someone to do something as unthinkable as this type of scenario if they were very determined and felt very passionately about taking Dylan away from his fighting parents. MOO


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD

In those cases, Le knows who has the child, such as the
recent case where the grandparents had taken him when he five. In this case, no one else is missing, only Dylan.
 
  • #679
In those cases, Le knows who has the child, such as the
recent case where the grandparents had taken him when he five. In this case, no one else is missing, only Dylan.

Exactly. When relative (or a nanny) kidnaps a child, they go missing with this child. Furthermore, Dylan was 13 years old. I don't envision anybody wanting to kidnap a 13 year old if they want a child to raise.
 
  • #680
How is that possible in a real world? I presume all their relatives are accounted for. Why in the world would some relative kidnap a 13 year old and keep them "somewhere remote?" That's beyond belief.

I don't find it hard to imagine or believe in the least, although it isn't a relative that I see being responsible. MOO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
137
Guests online
957
Total visitors
1,094

Forum statistics

Threads
632,406
Messages
18,626,034
Members
243,140
Latest member
raezofsunshine83
Back
Top