- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 70,203
- Reaction score
- 273,633
Okay - I'm out for the night! You guys behave and don't fight okay? Remember that discussion is good for the brain - even if you don't agree.
Salem
:angel::angel::angel::angel:
Okay - I'm out for the night! You guys behave and don't fight okay? Remember that discussion is good for the brain - even if you don't agree.
Salem
I think that it doesn't matter if Mark passed or failed or was deemed inconclusive on his Qualified LE polygraph test because I don't feel that the test is reliable.
I'm sure that LE looks at it the same way. They know that it's not good enough to bring into court but it does have a useful purpose in investigating crimes.
And one of those purposes is to intimidate suspects into revealing information that can convict someone of a crime.
MOO.
Regardless these Polygraph Test have been utilized as a Tool so Law Enforcement can either continue focusing on certain family members, or rule them out, and move on.
Clearly MR on the Dr Phil show stated he Failed, then he said it was inconclusive. and something about an unqualified person had administered him the test.
Then after the performance MR displayed for the millions watching concerning agreeing to retake another Polygraph Test that would be administered by a highly qualified examiner, MR once again as only he knows how, used excuses, and intentionally disqualified himself from retaking the test he agreed on.
Not once, Not twice, Three times on the Dr Phil show, MR refused to allow the Polygraph Test to be utilized in possibly showing millions watching that MR was innocent according to the Polygraph Test of any involvement in Dylan Redwines Disapearance.
Mark Redwine could've helped bring Closure to Dylan's Disapearance, But instead Mark Redwine created more suspicioun directed at himself.:jail:
http://www.ourcoloradonews.com/news...cle_e98ce2fa-8277-11e2-80f5-001a4bcf887a.html
( The Polygraph Test )
(Prior to the polygraph Dr. Phil said if one of his sons were missing he would be doing everything possible to find them but he told Mark Redwine that he was acting the complete opposite. Mark Redwine did not show any emotion during the two-day taping of the show.
“You seem diametrically opposite from that. You seem smug, you seem cavalier, you seem unplugged, you seem combative. You just seem like you just aren't engaged. Which makes me think either you don't care or you already have the answer,” Dr. Phil told Mark Redwine.
Back stage Dr. Phil told Mark that if he takes the polygraph and he has nothing to do with Dylan's disappearance it will clear him.
“I don't know what happened here. If you have your son stashed somewhere or if God forbid you flew into a rage and you hurt him accidentally and he's dead, if something has happened I will help you deal with it now and we will go recover that young man. Because if you are involved it's just a matter of time,” Dr. Phil said, adding that his offer had a shelf life. “If you're not involved then there's something seriously wrong with you because your reaction to this, something's wrong.”
Mark Redwine responded by saying he's not afraid of the truth and said he feels like his being attacked. He said he's not a violent person and agreed to take a polygraph. Dr. Phil arranged for Jack Trimarco to administer the test but when it came down to it he backed out first saying his blood pressure was up and he would do it the next day. The next day 20 minutes into the test Mark Redwine said he didn't sleep well the night before and had drank a half a bottle of Jim Beam and said he didn't feel well enough.
Trimarco said in all of years of giving polygraph tests he had never encountered anyone who refused to take a polygraph test in a missing child case whether they were involved or not.)
BBM
Here's what Trimarco said. I keep wondering why that mother is in there -
Dr. Phil: In all of your experience have you ever encountered a mother and father with a missing child that were unwilling to take a poly?
Trimarco: I have not ever had a mother and father refuse to take a poly in a missing child case whether they were involved or not.
http://www.durangoherald.com/article/20121215/NEWS01/121219687/A-boy’s-life--
Members the other day were talking about timelines concerning MR contacting people, I just noticed a screen shot on Ryan's cell phone, and I believe at 4:14 Ryan's sending a text to Dylan's cell.
4:14 november 19 Ryan ( Dude your dads looking for ou)
4:14 November 19 Ryan (you)
Then later at 7:53 PM
7:53 November 19 Ryan (Are you alright dude?)
7:53 November 19 Ryan (Dude you need to call somebody anybody asap we all worried about you your mom called and shes worried about you bro)
7:53 November 19 Ryan (Seriously when you get the message call someone)
So before 4:14 PM Monday afternoon MR contacted Ryan. In person or cell phone ? I don't know.
So does anyone have prior timelines involving MR contacting Elaine, or others prior ? From the time MR claimed he woke up that afternoon, and the chain of events he's stated until finally arriving to report Dylan missing with Law Enforcement.
I believe the mail carrier thought the person she recognized as Dylan was around 1:30 PM Monday afternoon, I'm trying to get an understanding of when MR actually left his house, he would have been driving towards bayfield Durango, and I would think if MR was actually searching for Dylan he would have stopped the mail carrier, and asked questions __unless her route on that long road was completed.
Actually I've never read anywhere that MR asked any adults if they've seen Dylan that day.
He made that clear on the official Facebook. His Dad's test was inconclusive so he wanted him to retake it, but he stalled, and never actually agreed to do so.
Much like he did on DP.
He, meaning Cory? Why are we supposed to take that as fact?
Mark said on Dr. Phil that they first told him he failed the poly, then told him it was inconclusive. We have no confirmation from LE either way. We only have Mark's word about what Bender supposedly told him.
Frankly, I have a hard time trusting Cory's word on FB as fact, considering some of the other things he's thrown out there. But that's just me.
No, not at this point. The request for a 2nd poly is very important, in my opinion. We want confirmation from LE/MSM about that. It could be a huge clue as to what LE is thinking, depending on how one interprets their behavior..... for me, it bodes ill for MR if they haven't asked for a 2nd.....
Salem
IF Mark failed the first poly, then it would be SOP for LE to ask him to take another one, at least this is what I've seen in other cases. They have been known to give several polys, as long as the person agreed.
If it was inconclusive, they may or may not ask him to take another one. And if what Mark says that Bender told him is true, then that is also possible. He could have told him that in order to try to convince him to take another one.
But we have no way of knowing for certain until LE confirms it.
I'm interested in why you feel that a request for a second LE polygraph is significant. For myself it would depend on the first results combined with all of the evidence collected so far.
On top of that, I would look at the reliability of the polygraphs in general before making a decision to do another.
Finally, would the results of a second LE qualified polygraph further the investigation or hinder it?
Trimarco must have been referring to Elaine, since she never passed her poly....umm ...WAIT, YES she did pass her first one. So I guess he didn't mean to imply it was ER.