CO- Dylan Redwine, 13, Vallecito, 19 November 2012 - #46

[song22]

I am going to hazard a guess that this release was meant to rattle MR & they will be inviting him to another official interview soon regarding any discrepancies related to any inconsistencies found in the MB interview and/or DP.

i agree with you because they seem to go out of their way to address many of the potential scenarios other than MR's involvement. they address point by point the postal worker, the rental guy, who actually made the report, and a rebuttal of the ER,CR,MH scenario MR brought up on Dr. Phil. JMO.

 

[eileenhawkeye]

Someone asked early what would happen if the entire family was cleared. Well, I think that if that were to happen, discussion here would slow down immensely. It's much easier to talk about a case when there is a clear person that people suspect. But when you have a case where the suspect is a complete blank---the boogeyman---or even if people do have a suspect in mind, we might not be able to sleuth them due to the rules--it can make discussing a case more difficult. I think Elizabeth and Lyric's case is a good example of this.

 

[Eileen730]

What the heck? I don't even know what this means.

It means there could be a reason they have not released the video of Mark and his son in Walmart.
You know walking thru the store, Paying at the register Dad and son INTERACTING!

Like Baby Lisa Irwins MOM buying her wine or Casey Anthony buying her beer!

 

[song22]

What the heck? I don't even know what this means.

Maybe there is more video in Walmart that LE has and it shows Dylan and MR arguing or fighting.

 

[Tennlyn]

i agree with you because they seem to go out of their way to address many of the potential scenarios other than MR's involvement. they address point by point the postal worker, the rental guy, who actually made the report, and a rebuttal of the ER,CR,MH scenario MR brought up on Dr. Phil. JMO.

The only thing missing from the Press Release was a statement that LPSCO is planning on continuing their search of the lake as soon as weather permits. I hate that Dylan's family has to make those arrangements. :moo:

Oh well, one can't ask for everything at once and overall, I'm pleased to see LE confirming that they are right about where I thought they were on this investigation. Sounds like they really are tying up lose ends and showing exactly where the focus is. :moo:

 

[Money Girl]

I am just taking the press release for what it states, not what it does not state. Trying to interpret things that are not stated just causes confusion.

As far as items that have been discussed here and guessed at repeatedly, the one big conclusion that has been stated is that Dylan was at MR's home on the night of arrival at the airport.

 

[Dee10]

Maybe there is more video in Walmart that LE has and it shows Dylan and MR arguing or fighting.

It kind of sounds that way doesn't it? Maybe they are hoping a witness will come forward as to any possible discussions someone may have overheard to go with the video? It certainly looks to me like they are indeed building a case.

 

[Salem]

I find this interesting:

"Investigators learned that Mark has said he last saw Dylan at around 7:30 AM Monday, November 19, 2012 at his home in Vallecito when Mark left for Durango to run errands. Investigators have also learned Mark returned home at about 11:30 AM and discovered that Dylan was gone."

The first sentence is clearly based on what MR told them, while the second sentence seems to indicate it is something LE independently confirmed. Anyone else read it that way?

Salem

 

[Money Girl]

So the press release above is very interesting to me and has a lot of info. It reiterates that the postal worker did not see Dylan. it confirms that it was Elaine who made the initial report that Dylan was missing. It rules out that ER, CR, and MH somehow managed to sneak away and abduct Dylan, as they were where they said they were. It also says they have confirmed that Dylan made it to MR's that night. I also find it interesting that they are looking at the activities and interactions of MR and Dylan. I'm especially interested in "interactions".

I don't think we have ever had a question that it was ER who reported Dylan missing to the La Plata County Sheriff’s Office. She has always said that, and I have not seen anyone question it.

 

[raine1212]

I find this interesting:

"Investigators learned that Mark has said he last saw Dylan at around 7:30 AM Monday, November 19, 2012 at his home in Vallecito when Mark left for Durango to run errands. Investigators have also learned Mark returned home at about 11:30 AM and discovered that Dylan was gone."

The first sentence is clearly based on what MR told them, while the second sentence seems to indicate it is something LE independently confirmed. Anyone else read it that way?

Salem

I do Salem, I could not agree with you more..

 

[catswhiskers]

Or maybe the Walmart video just shows a father and son shopping? Why would that be released? IMO The only reason we have seen even a capture from that store video is because it shows the type of clothing Dylan was wearing, and also what he looked like physically when he went missing. Many of the officially released pics seem to show Dylan with a much shorter hair style.

 

[fedfan4life]

The only real surprise is that Dylan was confirmed to make it to the home that evening. That has to be the significance of the 9:37pm communication, in that it is linked to the house itself (i.e. using a wireless router)

 

[Emma Ems]

From the news release:

The BBM is very interesting:

Mark’s and Dylan’s interactions and activities within the community on November 18th and 19th, as well as tips related to persons, locations and sightings remain under investigation.

I found this interesting too. Along with this part:

Investigators learned that Mark has said he last saw Dylan at around 7:30 AM Monday, November 19, 2012 at his home in Vallecito when Mark left for Durango to run errands. Investigators have also learned Mark returned home at about 11:30 AM and discovered that Dylan was gone.

And this one too:

Investigators learned that Mark met Dylan at the Durango-La Plata County Airport at about 5:45 PM Sunday, November 18th. Investigators confirmed that Dylan arrived at Mark’s home on Sunday at about 8:00 PM after stops at Wal-Mart and McDonald’s in Durango.

The last part I quoted says, very definitively IMO, that Dylan made it to Mark's.

There is something tugging at the back of my mind on what you posted too. Just not sure what exactly. Like a tip of the tongue thing.

 

[fedfan4life]

I find this interesting:

"Investigators learned that Mark has said he last saw Dylan at around 7:30 AM Monday, November 19, 2012 at his home in Vallecito when Mark left for Durango to run errands. Investigators have also learned Mark returned home at about 11:30 AM and discovered that Dylan was gone."

The first sentence is clearly based on what MR told them, while the second sentence seems to indicate it is something LE independently confirmed. Anyone else read it that way?

Salem

Yes. Definitely.

 

[Psychic Sleuth]

Some of it is stated as fact and confirmed, where some is worded as 'Mark has said'. My first thought after reading this statement is they are sending a message to someone. This is much more detailed than prior statements but no big surprises really. Where is the usual statements about not having any suspects, the family continues to cooperate etc.

 

[raine1212]

It has been confirmed by Elaine that the last text was from Dylan's phone. So my guess is LE have the pings from Dylans cell phone and know of his location until 9:37 pm

 

[Emma Ems]

That seems odd to me. Maybe it's just the wording...but I don't really get asking the Marshal's Office if they saw your son? Why would they have seen him? The Marshal's Office is 21 miles from Mark's house. This isn't like a really compact small town. Maybe he thought that one of the marshals saw Dylan while he or she was driving around? IDK.

The wording is very weird to me too, almost in the sense of looking at it like this: If someone went into a PD of any kind and asked, "Have you seen my kid" you would think they would have made a report, or would have had him make a report since Dylan is a minor and had been MIA for quite a few hours without contact. I don't want to dog LE for anything but could it be they 'brushed' him off when he came in thinking Dylan was just being a kid, when they should have filed a report, but didn't?

 

[Psychic Sleuth]

Investigators are reviewing recent information including tips, interviews, and reports generated since last November, seeking links that may be helpful as they plan and conduct future searches and interviews, and determine additional evidence analysis needs.

BBM

What does that mean?

 

[Bayou Mistress]

Investigators learned that Mark has said.... Why not just say, Mark said. Doesn't seem like it was learned at all and LPCSO needs someone with some writing skills. Hate to be picky about it, but we pour over the words as if they are gospel.:banghead:

 

[raine1212]

It has been confirmed by Elaine that the last text was from Dylan's phone. So my guess is LE have the pings from Dylans cell phone and know of his location until 9:37 pm

quoting myself to add. We might be able to narrow down the time if we go off the 9:37 (last Text from Dylans phone) to the 7:30 am time frame MR left home or even spread it to the time of his first appt. Do we have a time of his first appt on Monday or has that been released