- Joined
- Dec 7, 2011
- Messages
- 5,698
- Reaction score
- 4,969
I think the next step is to get the lake cleared. If he is not in there then what? Continued searches I would imagine. It's just so hard to search if you have no idea where to look.
A quick question about RSO's. Do they typically (or is there a study) look for victims (right wording?) close to home? Or do they find them away from where they live and bring them to their home?
MOO
-- which is one of the movies we would watch that night … you know… when we were together… and… you
know…
--He went upstairs for a few things – brought the DVD player down so we could watch that movie that he wanted to watch.
--Well, we were watching the movie together. I remember the movie being finished. I at some point was pacing the floor and got up and was taking care of a few little things you know over here at the kitchen table while we were doing that but, you know, it was – Shortly after the ending of that movie, which my guess, and I don’t recall because I don’t keep track of the clock… you know…it must have been… I thought it was earlier in the beginning…’cos I was fairly tired anyway, and I know Dylan was tired because he indicated to me that because he had been up ‘till 4:00 the night before and that he had spent most of the day in the airport traveling to get here that he was tired, and, you know, it seems to me it had to been about 10:30’ish maybe by the time the movie got done… somewhere in there and, you know, shortly after that I ran up and went to bed and he finished up doin’ whatever he was doin’ watching Nickelodeon or whatever he was watching.
During the MB uncut interview with MR, the MOVIE seems to be a huge factor. It's about here where MR begins to ramble, speaking faster and faster, like he wants to get through this portion of his story.
"which is one of the movies we would watch that night when we were..." uhhh when we were what? oh! when we were together...
When the movie was over, and MR was pacing the floor - how could Dylan and Mark be doing something if Mark was in the kitchen and Dylan was in the LR? What were they doing?
Yesterday I discussed perhaps Dylan never making it inside the home at all, but after reading this interview again, I think probably an argument was escalating with the movie playing in the background, and things went downhill from there.
I think the next step is to get the lake cleared. If he is not in there then what? Continued searches I would imagine. It's just so hard to search if you have no idea where to look.
Baby Sabrina Aisenberg
Baby Lisa Irwin
Madeleine McCann
Isabel Celis
All of these little girls 'disappeared' from in their home ( madi within a motel where her family stayed) without a trace, never to be heard from again. Parents to this day are under heavy scrutiny and rightly so. However no evidence points to the parent and no evidence points to an outside perp either.
Now Dylan Redwine , same basic circumstances. ( of course all have different specific details but the basics are the same)
Can all five of these parents be guilty and so slick they've gotten away with it?
I would venture to say, statistically speaking, at least 1 or 2 of these children
was taken by a crafty unknown perp. Anyone's guess which ones they are, but
the point is there have been many similar cases to Dylan's and not all of these
parents can be guilty and so savvy to have eluded police for years and years
on end. The way of the sneaky, invisible , wandering SO has eluded police for
years and in some cases forever.
MR looks really bad as do some of the other parents above but some of them
don't seem like they could have done it. The SO doesn't know what the parents
look like good or bad. They just seize on a golden opportunity, a solo unguarded
moment, an unexpected errand, a quick trip to the bathroom, just these silly
little every day things that we do routinely without knowing there is a predator
ready to strike.
Sabrina, Lisa, Madeliene, Isabel and Dylan. Not all of their parents are guilty. mooo
Is your head spinning through the details of each case right now dividing the guilty from the innocent parents ? Mine is ! mooooo
Just since writing this I've thought of another several kids with the same situation, vanished without a trace, parents look hinky but still no arrest. How can they all be guilty and have gotten away with it? I think it's impossible. jmoo
<snipped by me>From here (in this theory)....no crime scene at the home? Or was there a crime committed there that wouldn't leave much forensic evidence? So did Dylan run out of the house? But if so, wouldn't MR follow him? Did he run out of the house and immediately get abducted by a stranger? Did MR follow him down the road and a quick crime ensued (and that's why LE are re-searching that portion of the road)? Would Dylan at about that time try reaching out for help by phone or text (the 9:37 communication)?
I really can't help but agree. You would think they needed those items ASAP and would use them as soon as they were given.
I " THINK" it's impossible. There are no statistics because those cases
aren't solved so no one knows. I'm just guessing that of all the ' guilty'
looking parents in high profile cases, some of them MUST be innocent.
mooo
This is sickening. I never thought we'd be here over 4 months later...Unbelievable.
So sorry Elaine and Cory.
Balling. I guess its finally hit me.
Added bolding in regard to MR's statement about pacing the floor...
[Quoted from his interview: "I at some point was pacing the floor"]
I have to wonder why MR was pacing the floor? I'm an extremely anxious person, and the only time I've ever paced the floor is when I'm very nervous or very upset about something extremely serious (like when I wasn't sure what to do when my nephew was badly hurt 10 hours away). I don't know about others, but pacing the floor in my mind is for one of three reasons...
1.) Trying to figure out what one can do about something that has happened, or will happen (the pacing takes the place of wanting to take some kind of immediate action so you can wear off some of the adrenaline and think straight).
2.) Being in a heated discussion about something extremely important to someone, and pacing back and forth in order to again, burn off adrenaline, take time to think, etc...
3.) Nervous waiting - like when someone gets hurt and you are at the hospital waiting for the doctor to come out and give you information. (Had to do a bit of that a couple times during my husband's back surgery a few years ago.)
Just in reviewing what I've written above I think obviously the underlying emotion in all of these scenarios is apprehension/anxiety/nervousness -- and in my experience all of the anxiety comes from a base of FEAR, really.
It would be interesting to ask MR why he was pacing the floor that night. What made him get so nervous? What was he fearful about? Why would he get up during a movie to pace the floor anyway?
His demeanor and words during the uncut interview are quite telling that he either doesn't quite remember what went on, or he is hiding the truth of how the night went, but that's my opinion of course. We haven't heard him say he had been drinking or anything that night, so why he wouldn't remember what happened is interesting. I think it's more likely for one to forget details and say something like, for instance; "we watched a movie and when it was over I went up to bed and DR was watching TV when I left to go to bed. He usually sleeps on the couch anyway, so that wasn't odd." Instead, he talks quickly, throws in a bunch of extraneous details that cloud the narrative, and contradicts himself in his own statements one after the other... That is rather odd, IMO.
As always, all of the above is MOO! :cow:
I was thinking earlier of the people that have been determined to be not involved in this case such as RSO, the 2 boys, the guy looking for rentals, ER, MH, CR & who know else. It's really is only a 4 hour period they need to account for between 7:30 & 11:30 right? It should be an easier set of hours to be able to verify someones whereabouts vs. through the night. It also gives more opportunity for potential witness to have noticed anything unusual as it was daylight.
I was thinking earlier of the people that have been determined to be not involved in this case such as RSO, the 2 boys, the guy looking for rentals, ER, MH, CR & who know else. It's really is only a 4 hour period they need to account for between 7:30 & 11:30 right? It should be an easier set of hours to be able to verify someones whereabouts vs. through the night. It also gives more opportunity for potential witness to have noticed anything unusual as it was daylight.
:therethere:
This is where I was a few weeks ago. I've bounced back. Seeking Dylan and justice for Dylan. You will too.
CO LEO seem to be very, very tight-lipped. I'm not 100% certain about the dogs and tracking the scent. A lot of factors are involved there, such as temp, wind, etc., along with the fact that it's been said there was nothing of Dylan's to be used for scent tracking.
<snipped for space and focus>
From here (in this theory)....no crime scene at the home? Or was there a crime committed there that wouldn't leave much forensic evidence? So did Dylan run out of the house? But if so, wouldn't MR follow him? Did he run out of the house and immediately get abducted by a stranger? Did MR follow him down the road and a quick crime ensued (and that's why LE are re-searching that portion of the road)? Would Dylan at about that time try reaching out for help by phone or text (the 9:37 communication)?