CO- Dylan Redwine, 13, Vallecito, 19 November 2012 - #50

[katydid23]

“There was never ever any evidence to support anything in the way of kidnapping by anybody, but because my ex-wife planted that seed … these search warrants were all issued based on the words coming out of her mouth,” Mark Redwine said.

In a statement released to the media, Mark admits it’s possible someone may be holding his son captive but that police could be overlooking the obvious.

“I don’t think there’s any evidence to support the fact that it’s not a possibility that he could have run away,” Mark Redwine said.

Mark Redwine continues to say he’s not placing blame or saying investigators are doing a poor job, but simply saying there’s more to the case than meets the eye.

http://denver.cbslocal.com/2013/05/19/still-no-sign-of-dylan-redwine-after-6-months/

BBM

Not sure that LE would have been granted Search Warrants based on Elaine's statements.

Well, Mark, why don't you tell us the "more to the case than meets the eye" part? Perhaps then you won't be a possible top suspect to me.

Once again Mark says something but then leaves everyone hanging.

This man is so frustrating to me....

JMO

I hear ya. I can only imagine how utterly frustrating this has to be for Elaine and her family, hearing him talk in circles like this. :stormingmad:

 

[Angelonline]

“I don’t think there’s any evidence to support the fact that it’s not a possibility that he could have run away,” Mark Redwine said.



What the heck is he trying to say here?

I think he is saying that Dylan may have run away. IMO
I thought he said the opposite in the past, though, so who knows.

 

[Angelonline]

Found the link-

"He said he doesn’t think Dylan ran away. He has nothing and no one to run away from, Mark Redwine said."

http://www.durangoherald.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?aid=/20121128/NEWS01/121129612&template=mobileart

 

[katydid23]

I think he is saying that Dylan may have run away. IMO
I thought he said the opposite in the past, though, so who knows.

He did say the opposite in the past, adamantly so.

He just talks in circles though. All of these double negatives give me a headache.

 

[Bayou Mistress]

I don't think that ER, MR, or the investigators have a clue. And I don't think that exploring old theories is a bad thing at this stage of the game. But then we are back to crackers, I suppose.

Did Dylan run?
Did someone unknown take Dylan?
Did someone known take Dylan?

We don't know, and sadly neither do his parents, and judging by the lack of finding him or making an arrest, neither does LE. Very sad.

 

[Bayou Mistress]

He did say the opposite in the past, adamantly so.

He just talks in circles though. All of these double negatives give me a headache.

I know, right. Grammatical mistakes drive me crazy. I overlook them quite frequently. He's not the only one who makes them. I'll take the high road and not point out the ones that bother me.

 

[katydid23]

Dylan did not run. There is absolutely nothing to indicate that. There was no reason for him to and no evidence that he took any money or made any plans or ever desired to do so.

He might have been taken by a stranger or family friend, but he didn't run away, imo.

 

[Lordeebee]

I know, right. Grammatical mistakes drive me crazy. I overlook them quite frequently. He's not the only one who makes them. I'll take the high road and not point out the ones that bother me.

He first says Dylan would not have run away. Now saying he could have run away. How is that grammatical?? Those are two very opposite statements imo.

 

[AnotherSetOfEyes]

“I don’t think there’s any evidence to support the fact that it’s not a possibility that he could have run away,” Mark Redwine said.



What the heck is he trying to say here?

Shaking my head. Why does that feel like more than a double negative? And what is the obvious that LE is missing? And what is the more than meets the eye? This statement required decoding skills.

 

[Bayou Mistress]

He first says Dylan would not have run away. Now saying he could have run away. How is that grammatical?? Those are two very opposite statements imo.

I was responding right there, to the poster who said the double negatives give her a headache. I get one when people end sentences in prepositions or when they don't say words correctly, such as "lie-bary" or "expecially". I responded earlier to the concern about going back to revisit old theories. That isn't a contradiction, it's an approach when current methods are not fruitful.

 

[deoneta]

A couple of things stand out to me in MR's statement. I agree that someone helped him with this statement. I also think that's okay, especially given MR's propensity to ramble, at least in his verbal statements. If I had to write a statement for publication, I'd definitely ask for a proof read and editing suggestions.

I think his comment about mediation is his way of needling ER. I also doubt he's sincere about wanting to go through mediation. MR lacked the courtesy, respect and guts to tell ER person to person that her son was missing and opted to text. For that reason, I find his subsequent appeals for communication hollow. I also don't think his remarks to CR should have been public.

What individuals in the community does MR think have hampered the investigation? Is this a reference to ER's friends and supporters who have worked so hard in the search effort and to raise awareness?

I have no idea what LE has shared with ER, but my guess is that they may have been more forthcoming with ER than with MR since LE has stated that ER. CR and MH were nowhere near Vallecito at the time of the disappearance. I also think that ER would refrain from revealing anything LE asked her not to disclose.

As for MR's timeline, I've always believed the crucial times are when MR said they were watching the DVD and MR's nap time. These are two big chunks of time which MR was able to explain away without going into any detail. All MOO and my speculation only.

 

[SCHMAE]

Three of the babies I've been following have been found deceased in bodies of water since last night Please Dylan do not be in that lake !!!!!!!!!!! Praying for a safe return . Call me delusional but I'm holding out hope until there is no hope left !

 

[Lordeebee]

“There was never ever any evidence to support anything in the way of kidnapping by anybody, but because my ex-wife planted that seed … these search warrants were all issued based on the words coming out of her mouth,” Mark Redwine said

First, search warrants PLURAL...makes me curious if there has been another search warrant since 10 days after the disappearance?

Second, I don't believe LE would issue a search warrant because of something that came out of Elaine's mouth... It's more likely a search warrant was issued because of what came out of MR's mouth !!(speaking as though Dylan was deceased within a few days of his disappearance for one) Not to mention that Dylan ceased to communicate with the world within hours of MR picking him up at the airport and oh yeah, he failed a polygraph test.

 

[AnotherSetOfEyes]

One factor in this disappearance makes me feel certain that Dylan did not run away. That is Cory. A thirteen year old might not contact his parents if he was angry with them. But Dylan would have let Cory know that he is safe by now. And Cory would never let his mother suffer.

It would be wonderful, if Dylan is hidden and MR is trying to create a scenario that would allow Dylan to reappear. But that is just wishful thinking, I'm afraid.
____
MOO

 

[mijamawi]

*Sigh*

Round and round we go. Nothing is being accomplished. I hope like hell LE has something. The back and forth is tiresome. No one is going to change their mind. If MR doesn't speak, he's guilty as hell. If MR speaks, his words are dissected like a sheep brain.

There's no winner in a missing persons case. Dylan loses. Even if he's alive, he's lost 6 months of his life. The constant bickering gives me tired head and when people ask, "What's wrong with our world?" I can't help but come back to the ugliness I've seen right here on this case.

Just imagine if MR is innocent. Who's really looking for Dylan then?

 

[Lordeebee]

“There was never ever any evidence to support anything in the way of kidnapping by anybody, but because my ex-wife planted that seed … these search warrants were all issued based on the words coming out of her mouth,” Mark Redwine said

First, search warrants PLURAL...makes me curious if there has been another search warrant since 10 days after the disappearance?

Second, I don't believe LE would issue a search warrant because of something that came out of Elaine's mouth... It's more likely a search warrant was issued because of what came out of MR's mouth !!(speaking as though Dylan was deceased within a few days of his disappearance for one) Not to mention that Dylan ceased to communicate with the world within hours of MR picking him up at the airport and oh yeah, he failed a polygraph test.

Also need to add that imo MR planted his own seed about kidnapping, when he failed to return his children on more than one occasion.

 

[cluciano63]

I have to say, MR reminds me of Remy Ramsaran in the remarks he makes...everyone else is at fault, internet is evil, even down to MR more or less painting Dylan as a flake who might fall in a lake or visit a sex offender...RR said negative things about his wife, and made endless comments which can be viewed on Jennifer's thread...all before he was charged with her murder two days ago.

 

[Lordeebee]

*Sigh*

Round and round we go. Nothing is being accomplished. I hope like hell LE has something. The back and forth is tiresome. No one is going to change their mind. If MR doesn't speak, he's guilty as hell. If MR speaks, his words are dissected like a sheep brain.

There's no winner in a missing persons case. Dylan loses. Even if he's alive, he's lost 6 months of his life. The constant bickering gives me tired head and when people ask, "What's wrong with our world?" I can't help but come back to the ugliness I've seen right here on this case.

Just imagine if MR is innocent. Who's really looking for Dylan then?

I would say the same people that have been looking for Dylan.

As far as the constant bickering - When something comes out of MR's mouth like Dylan's mother is responsible for the fact that his home was searched, that's what I call bickering. And I have to admit I feel protective of this woman who has been through enough.

 

[scorekeeper]

*Sigh*

Round and round we go. Nothing is being accomplished. I hope like hell LE has something. The back and forth is tiresome. No one is going to change their mind. If MR doesn't speak, he's guilty as hell. If MR speaks, his words are dissected like a sheep brain.

There's no winner in a missing persons case. Dylan loses. Even if he's alive, he's lost 6 months of his life. The constant bickering gives me tired head and when people ask, "What's wrong with our world?" I can't help but come back to the ugliness I've seen right here on this case.

Just imagine if MR is innocent. Who's really looking for Dylan then?

BBM

Elaine, Cory, Mike, LE, human and canine searchers, everyday people....do you really believe that no one is looking for Dylan? The FMDR page has 27,000+ people.

When I am out, I am always looking. He may not be in Ohio, but I do look.

I think everyone that visits this thread looks.

When Dylan is found and someone other than MR is charged with his disappearance, I'll eat my crow.

With what I know now, MR is still high on my list.

If MR would give the same/straight answers, perhaps his words wouldn't be dissected. He is the king of "word salad" for sure.

 

[azgrandma]

“There was never ever any evidence to support anything in the way of kidnapping by anybody, but because my ex-wife planted that seed … these search warrants were all issued based on the words coming out of her mouth,” Mark Redwine said.

In a statement released to the media, Mark admits it’s possible someone may be holding his son captive but that police could be overlooking the obvious.

“I don’t think there’s any evidence to support the fact that it’s not a possibility that he could have run away,” Mark Redwine said.

Mark Redwine continues to say he’s not placing blame or saying investigators are doing a poor job, but simply saying there’s more to the case than meets the eye.
BBM - when did EH ever plant a seed about kidnapping, did we all miss that one?
BIU by me - didn't MR say earlier that he wanted and welcomed LE to come search because he knew that as the last person that was with Dylan he would be looked at (please don't ask me for the link, it's his MB interview and the store front interview)
BIU in Red by me - didn't MR say that Dylan would not have run away, he had nothing to runaway from?
BIU in Blue by me - didn't his recent press release indicate that LE messed up?

I'm soooo confused, which MR statement is true? MOO none he constantly contridicts himself.