That sounds like a person is guilty until proven innocent to me. I just don't look at people that way but to each his own.
Innocent until proven guilty, IUPG is reserved for the JURY and JURORS sitting on a case. It's not something that the public HAS TO adhere to.
I am wondering if there would have been at least 2 different search warrants issued back in November - one for the search of the house, and then a separate one for the vehicles, given they had to be towed away to be
searched? Just a thought.
Also remember that there has been always been a lot of theorising about MR hiding Dylan away/kidnapping him himself. That notion, and then the one that MR would hurt Dylan out of spite for her has stemmed from EH's own words in the media IMO. Even in the latest article it seems she has restated her opinion about this, and I felt so disheartened when I read that - seeing it was an opportunity for a message to the public to be aware that Dylan is still missing. I really do get that this is her fear or her perhaps her strongest gut instinct, but IMO it doesn't send the message to keep an eye out for Dylan or whoever took him.
There is a difference in judging someone guilty and thinking them a suspect!
The courts will judge him.
BBMRedwine Family Speaks on Six Month Anniversary of Dylan's Disappearance
According to our sister station KCNC, Dylan's mother, Elaine Redwine, continues to say she thinks his father knows more about their son's disappearance than he's letting on.
Dylan's father, Mark Redwine, continues to say hes not to blame and wants investigators to do more digging.
Both parents have vowed to keep searching for Dylan until he is found.
http://www.krextv.com/news/around-t...verary-of-Dylans-Disappearance-208170411.html
OT
They found Sydney she was found in the very river the dogs hit on!
OT
They found Sydney she was found in the very river the dogs hit on!
http://www.imbodenlive.com/2013/03/...le-clues-but-no-answers-yet-in-disappearance/
Dogs had positive hits and sonar did not find anything.
Members of the Lawrence County Sheriffs Dive Team, Pocahontas Fire Department Dive Team and David Rader of Texas Equusearch launched boats at the Black Rock boat ramp and proceeded down river. According to the K-9 handlers, the dogs demonstrated positive signs in the area adjacent to the same area that clothing articles were found on Tuesday evening.
The Pocahontas Dive Team ran sonar through the area but were not able to locate anything. The positive hits by the K-9s is not proof positive of a person being in the river, but each lead has to be followed up on and ruled out before searchers move on.
http://denver.cbslocal.com/2013/05/19/still-no-sign-of-dylan-redwine-after-6-months/
BBM: Isn't this blaming Elaine? Should I be reading the BlueBBM: differently? Does he mean he is not blaming the investigators, but is blaming Elaine?
And could someone give me an idea of what "its possible someone may be holding his son captive but that police could be overlooking the obvious." means? I read "maybe someone is holding Dylan, but there is something more obvious that the police are not seeing. But I am not going say what that more obvious something is." Does someone read something else? (Serious question, I really want to know if I am missing something.)
More OT re: Sidney Randall
The body had been caught in a tree in the water about 1.5 miles south of a boat ramp.
Dotson says it appeared to have been underwater for some time.
http://www.wmctv.com/story/22298868/lawrence-co-sheriff-the-body-of-young-female-found-in-river
This could be relevant to Dylan's case in that IMO he could still be in that lake. The dogs are incredibly accurate as proven in Sidney's case. Sonar was brought in and did not find anything so the searchers moved on. This was on March 20th and she was just found.
I completely agree. As I've posted before, I consider those dogs earth angels. Combine that with the mother's instinct about the lake and I'd say there is a very strong probability he is there. I pray I am wrong.