- Joined
- Jan 10, 2011
- Messages
- 70,206
- Reaction score
- 273,681
Do they have that kind of relationship?
Yes, ER has worked hard to keep all of the boys in each others lives. I applaud her for that.
Do they have that kind of relationship?
How is that related to this case?
In cases where the immediate family are not under the slightest bit of suspicion, the families of the missing almost universally say that they are frustrated at the lack of information they get about the investigations. EH would be no exception. While she and MR both may have been asked not to disclose something, by no means do I believe that either has the inside track on the inner workings of this. I wish they did. I wish we did. But that would be folly for the real investigators.
IMO that would make sense to ask him about Dylan's belongings that he might have brought with him, example - backpack, if they were looking for a scent item for the dogs.
I believe in Tricia's previous (lst) interview with ER, when asked about the text didn't she say LE didn't want her to say anything? Why they did said I don't know. It could be to ask her something about it, like maybe is this a good friend of Dylan's or are these Dylan's normal text phrases?
True, but don't you think he would have wondered about Dylan's belongings, long before 48 hrs later, when asked about it by LE?
He says he was asked by LE 'to stay home' and wait to see if D would call or return home. During those 48 hrs in his home 'waiting', it never occurred to home to look to see if D's backpack was there? Or if the cell was there, or his $ or wallet?
If my young kid was missing I would immediately wonder if they had their cell and any money and any clothes with them? How could he sit in that house for 48 hrs and not look to see if the pack was still there? Didnt he wonder if he had a hoodie and long pants with him? How did he decide what clothes to list as him wearing if he never looked at the clothes he packed?
And wasn't Dylan supposedly camped out in the living room? How hard not to notice the backpack wasn't on the couch or coffee table anymore?
19th = Day 1
20th = Day 2
would that equate to "a day or two"?
If you are asking a question, then I do not recall her saying that at all. I could be wrong, admittedly.
Are you trying to make the argument that EH really does have the inside track?
How did "later", not immediately, a day or two turn into 48 hours? For real if it was 48 hours, more people are at fault than MR.
WAIT. :doh:
How did Mark decide what clothing to list on the MISSING poster, if he NEVER LOOKED to see what was missing or not?
So technically people who haven't even met each other can be considered to be stepmom and stepson and it has nothing to do with any kind of relationship.
It equates to "the first day, maybe even two"
:cow:
IMO that would make sense to ask him about Dylan's belongings that he might have brought with him, example - backpack, if they were looking for a scent item for the dogs.
If you are asking a question, then I do not recall her saying that at all. I could be wrong, admittedly.
Are you trying to make the argument that EH really does have the inside track?
06-02-13
Tricia’s Radio Show
T: When did you first find out that --or is it true that all of Dylan’s clothing and his iPod are missing?
MR: Well, to answer your question with a yes or no answer, yes, that’s true, but to clarify that, it wasn't ‘till, you know, a short time that law enforcement was aware of what was going on and was involved and I know that they immediately brought in some dogs to start tracking ya know, his movement, and try to figure out the direction that he was headed, and the question was posed to me, is his backpack here? and I'm like well I don't know, let me go look for it because I ..that's not something that I was looking for…so you know it probably took ..I wanna say the first day maybe even two before it was determined that yes, his backpack was not here..my only concern was Dylan and what have we got to do to find him…and where is he?
I agree, I was trying to figure out if this lent a timeline for when the backpack was first brought up.
How the heck, in any way, would it be a bash at Mark, for Eliane to consider his sons her stepsons? I see it as a compliment, as a tribute, as a gracious thing to do. The ultimate bash would have been for her to cut them off and act like she 'divorced' the boys.
I must be really missing something here. I see that as a very gracious thing for her to say, and not a bash in any way whatsoever, JMO.