nursebeeme
Registered User
- Joined
- May 3, 2008
- Messages
- 53,158
- Reaction score
- 226
folks we are NOT going to discuss the divorce or visitation situations as we do not have the documents and speculation about them is off the table.
So LE has said ' we are not calling MR a suspect' ? Correct.
Have they said anything like ' at this time' ?
Also why not just say ' we do not have a suspect at this time' .
It seems as they are singling him OUT to not be a suspect , which means
he's likely close to being a suspect as soon as they find that one little tiny something.
Is that correct?
I mean does it not seem odd to just say nothing about a suspect or there are no suspects.
<respectfully snipped>.
I've spent alot of time looking at the maps of dad's neighborhood and Vallecito lake and the general area and I guess my thinking needs to change from "someone random would stick out" to "someone who belongs there wouldn't stick out". So who might belong there? Who could potentially be driving down that "one way in, one way out" road and not raise alarms?
Just more thoughts.
Sometimes it not about the child, sometimes it's all about hurting the other parent
So LE has said ' we are not calling MR a suspect' ? Correct.
Have they said anything like ' at this time' ?
Also why not just say ' we do not have a suspect at this time' .
It seems as they are singling him OUT to not be a suspect , which means
he's likely close to being a suspect as soon as they find that one little tiny something.
Is that correct?
I mean does it not seem odd to just say nothing about a suspect or there are no suspects.
So LE has said ' we are not calling MR a suspect' ? Correct.
Have they said anything like ' at this time' ?
Also why not just say ' we do not have a suspect at this time' .
It seems as they are singling him OUT to not be a suspect , which means
he's likely close to being a suspect as soon as they find that one little tiny something.
Is that correct?
I mean does it not seem odd to just say nothing about a suspect or there are no suspects.
this is from Shupe:That really is strange wording. "We are not calling MR a suspect" is not the same as "MR is not a suspect". It sounds more like cya wording than anything.
I made a comment the other day about having to run my son's sax to him and somebody messaged me asking if my son plays the sax. I responded:
"You will have to consider that a rumor. The facts are I bought my son a sax at his request, allowed him to sign up for band and have spent 2 years paying for additional private lessons."
This case reminds me of that. If you read between the lines you will bring ear phones if you visit me when he is practicing but I didn't say it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
http://durangoherald.com/article/20...121139996/Investigators-end-search-of-house--Redwine has been cooperating with authorities and has not been named a suspect or person of interest, Shupe said.
I do too but I generally wait until multiple people get a shocked look and ask if that was really the last time I had my oil changed before I give up and get it done. I hate garages. They are not female friendly. Then again there could be a connection between the blonde jokes and the length of time between my visits
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Scorekeeper pointed out a "For Sale " sign on the corner across the street from the home.
I understand what you're saying, and I agree, but I was speaking specifically to the notion of MR kidnapping Dylan. If he kidnapped him, how is he going to keep Dylan's location a secret when there is a missing persons investigation going on?
How could he tend to Dylan unobserved with media and LE everywhere?
I understand what you're saying, and I agree, but I was speaking specifically to the notion of MR kidnapping Dylan. If he kidnapped him, how is he going to keep Dylan's location a secret when there is a missing persons investigation going on?
How could he tend to Dylan unobserved with media and LE everywhere?
Does that home belong to the family? Or was this pointed out as a possible hiding place for Dylan? Just trying to understand
I wasn't speaking about this case specifically. I was making a blanket general statement. I have known of quite a few couples that during and after divorcing spent all of their time, effort and money to hurt the other parent, using the children as pawns in the process. Hurting the other parent becomes more important than their children. I was just tossing it out there![]()
I wasn't speaking about this case specifically. I was making a blanket general statement. I have known of quite a few couples that during and after divorcing spent all of their time, effort and money to hurt the other parent, using the children as pawns in the process. Hurting the other parent becomes more important than their children. I was just tossing it out there![]()