Logical thinking leads us to believe that if LE event A happened one day, and then LE event B happened the next day, then event B happened because of what happened on the first day.
For example-
PF at the dump on 12/19, then LE at KB's condo on 12/20: therefore something at the dump led LE back to the condo.
LE at KB's condo on 12/20 and 12/21, then PF is arrested on 12/22: therefore something at the second search of the condo led to PF's arrest.
I don't necessarily agree since there are a lot of LE "events" taking place that we aren't aware of. Have to remember that evidence is being processed from Day 1 that LE began investigating. Critical lab results can drop in anytime.
I go back to the crater in front of PF's ranchette from the search warrant. A septic tank or field has been mentioned, but you only need a shovel to access a tank, and you probably can't rip up a septic field and not replace it (no port a potties seen at ranchette- thank you
@retiredrickyinCO).
So what was the digging for? Did trucks leave with dirt? I don't remember this being reported. It would take time to sort through huge amounts of dirt. But why else would you dig? I can't imagine a body was found there.
What about the large barn on the property? This is a location where PF could deal with a body out of sight. Could there be blood or tissue evidence in the barn? Activity to make sure KB was never found?
From satellite images before the warrant, the dig areas looks like a small ravine and not a septic field. Could cleaning fluids or acids have been dumped into it, maybe with trace evidence of human tissue?
Not sure what my point is, beyond that I think we will may eventually find the search warrant at the ranchette was more important than the condo searches.
They went there looking for something.