If she were in an inpatient treatment plan, she would have been in a facility. So no, she wasn't in an inpatient treatment plan. After what came out about PF's assault in the hospital and the baby being removed from the both of them until child services could determine he was safe, I'm wondering if there was mandatory counseling ordered as a term of condition or if the child advocate suggested to KB that she receive counseling based on what they had observed with PF.
Another tidbit that I've considered:
Sometimes when a self-admitted patient comes into a facility
to help w/ an ongoing problem the patient (KB) learns so much
from a good therapist- like trying to untangle the reasons for
the problem, whether that's caused by someone else in their life making them miserable, confused, depressed, drinking, etc.
and what the patient can try to do to lessen the problem (or person causing the problem).
My guess is KB got to talk through her feelings and problems
and the therapist guided her into clearer thinking and THEY
may have come to the conclusion that PF was the one causing
the problems. She may have left the clinic with a whole new
path for her life since she better understood what she must do
for her sake and the sake of her daughter.
Sometimes talking out one's problems leads to a new perspective.
My guess is she was making plans for major changes in her life
and she may have hinted this to PF. She in no way caused
his reaction, but his reaction prompted his crime. moo.