- Joined
- Jan 19, 2011
- Messages
- 1,559
- Reaction score
- 12,469
I
Rant Over: plz no rotten apples
I wonder if they are proven murderers, child rapists etc. why we keep them and feed them period. I believe in the DP 30 days to think about it then let it end, bring back death by electrocution , that penalty was a very feared penalty and some of these perpetrators might have that pause thinking about electrocution and not do their horrible deeds. Some believe it inhumane but beating a person to death is inhumane, strangling your wife in front of your child and then letting a child watch while you smother its sibling is inhumane, the list goes on. People like CW IMO seems at ease now that IT is over and all he has to do is just eat and sleep maybe work a little with no responsibilities. That punishment does not fit the crime.This may sound very callous, but there are times when I don't understand our form of incarceration.
When someone commits a crime, we often want to punish them. And yet, for many criminals, punishment is nothing...it does nothing, it accomplishes nothing, and often it makes them WORSE criminals. Punishment is moot, IMO the goal should be keeping that individual from committing crime.
Why do we waste time and resources? Why not just lock them up for good, with minimal care (human treatment with the min. of resources used)?
Rant Over: plz no rotten apples
Last edited: