I'm just so curious what type of defense the defense team can even put on. If it's motive and they stick with CW killed SW because she killed their daughters - well, that's his motive. If they decide that story is stupid because of how unlikely it would be that he would kill his wife in the same exact manner that she killed their daughters and then staged an elaborate cover up and disposal of bodies and fake worry news interviews, then hopefully there is enough evidence to prove beyond reasonable doubt that he did in fact murder the girls. He already confessed to killing SW.
I am not an attorney, but will any other factors like finances or social media or MLM matter in terms of being able to get a conviction? Those may be contributing factors as to the "why" - but do they add up to evidence? Is introducing reasons "why" CW may have done this enough to win a case? I still can't believe any juror would believe SW went into a rage and killed both kids and CW reacted by killing her. If he felt the slightest bit remorseful over what he has done to his family, he should spare her family the pain, confess to the truth, and spare everyone a charade of innocence. I get he is entitled to due process and a legal defense, but it is infuriating if he is blaming HIS crime as his VICTIM'S doing!
ETA: I guess what I am ultimately trying to say is:
- If CW says he killed SW because she was killing the kids - no other factors are coming into play. It was because he claims he saw her doing this.
- If this was not the reason why, and it was because - pick a reason - she was annoying, on SM all the time, he had a new love interest, he wanted a fresh start, debt, her MLM life was taking over - well, none of those are acceptable reasons for murder. It doesn't really matter why he killed her or what else was going on in their lives. It's a crime. Isn't that enough? Those aren't extenuating circumstances.