I will cross that bridge if it is ever built.
They are building it.
I will cross that bridge if it is ever built.
They are building it.
<modsnip - do not tag the member whose post you are quoting>No. That does not say we have to give equal weight to all VI's opinions.
Yeah, that doesn't seem like everything is on the up and up to me...IMHO of course.Why did CW need to speak with his dad before confessing? Or would only confess, if he could speak to this dad?
This is what I keep pondering.
I would think it would be his appointed attorneys and theirs present as well moo
Right she knew her in a different capacity, which I took to mean not necessarily as a friend, but as CW'S wife. Also, " I didn't dislike her," is not usually what you would say about a friend. She said she believed CW when he gave the porch interview. There is nothing unusual about supporting a friend. I never got the impression she was hiding the fact that they were good friends. I don't think the other VI 's are either. Of course you are going to defend someone you care about. Naturally they are biased, I don't see anything wrong with that. I would defend my friend as well. JmoAs I was looking for a particular post of Trinket’s for another post regarding the AP, I came across a few others I thought I’d bring forward to hopefully address some misconceptions about her perspective.
The threads are closed so I could not use multi-quote to bring them here. I apologize if there’s a better way to do this that I’m not aware of.
Misconception: Trinket only knew CW well.
Misconceptions: CW never had a girlfriend until he met SW. He went to Miami U.
Misconception: This VI didn’t like SW or know her well enough to have a valid opinion.
MOO
Now copy and paste the ones where this same V.i felt CW is telling the truth about SW kiling the kids.As I was looking for a particular post of Trinket’s for another post regarding the AP, I came across a few others I thought I’d bring forward to hopefully address some misconceptions about her perspective.
The threads are closed so I could not use multi-quote to bring them here. I apologize if there’s a better way to do this that I’m not aware of.
Misconception: Trinket only knew CW well.
Misconceptions: CW never had a girlfriend until he met SW. He went to Miami U.
Misconception: This VI didn’t like SW or know her well enough to have a valid opinion.
MOO
I didn't get the idea it was "potentially salacious" at all@Trinket78 was the one who said she found out about the AP when everyone else did (“at the start” was initially perceived to mean at the start of the affair, which she later clarified).
@Colorado303 is the one who hinted at a potentially salacious reason Bella was changing schools.
Hope this helps! MOO
No, it was not the same VI who made the statement about the school. Anyway one school was a private school and since that would cost more, then the reason might be because of costs imo.
BBM
<modsnip - do not tag the member whose post you are quoting> No that was Colorado303
Trust me, you really don’t want me to answer this.
Colorado303, Saturday at 5:22 PM
thanks guys@Trinket78 was the one who said she found out about the AP when everyone else did (“at the start” was initially perceived to mean at the start of the affair, which she later clarified).
@Colorado303 is the one who hinted at a potentially salacious reason Bella was changing schools.
Hope this helps! MOO
Yes, that's the one where it was said she didn't see it as him lying, because she knew how he was when he was nervousNow copy and paste the ones where this same V.i felt CW is telling the truth about SW kiling the kids.
Thanks in advance![]()
Right she knew her in a different capacity, which I took to mean not necessarily as a friend, but as CW'S wife. Also, " I didn't dislike her," is not usually what you would say about a friend. She said she believed CW when he gave the porch interview. There is nothing unusual about supporting a friend. I never got the impression she was hiding the fact that they were good friends. I don't think the other VI 's are either. Of course you are going to defend someone you care about. Naturally they are biased, I don't see anything wrong with that. I would defend my friend as well. Jmo
Yes, I wish we hadn't been left with this mystery...thanks guys
appreciate the clarification.
but still my point remains the unsubstantiated posts that create confusion and innuendo by VIs
ie the trust me you don't want me to answer this statement.
its not really a fair post to make imo
and ill be judged for passing judgement on an unreasonable statement.
MLM’s are usually short lived and not a long lasting career.I agree. Chase Bank always seems more than willing to loan you money for the equity in your home. The HOA problem is a sign the finances were out of control. Unfortunately, those MLMs require too much investment on the part of the seller. People get in over their heads before they realize their business has tied up all their cash flow.
Now copy and paste the ones where this same V.i felt CW is telling the truth about SW kiling the kids.
Thanks in advance![]()
As long as the words of a VI aren’t given more weight than the facts, I take no issue with who someone wants to believe.OK. I think it comes down to the fact that some people are going to believe what they want to believe. No matter what is posted, they are going to interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms their preexisting hypotheses or theories. JMO