purple bolding mine
@al66pine :
Good post. ^^^
We don't have to agree -- but I think we already are in agreement. 
The actual identity doesn't have to be revealed and in fact I think it should be withheld until (hopefully) an arrest is made.
That's if there's been foul play, and I sadly think that's happened as I don't see Suzanne letting her girls wait and be in anguish this long.
My .02 : Is that the
specific identity is not necessary to warn the public of, no.
Esp. if it's just a poi or someone LE are concerned about at that time.
So that's not what I was saying -- but I could have clarified the comment a bit better.
A BOLO could encompass anyone from a stalker to a random abductor to a person possibly known to the Morphews'.
Not the "who", just that LE believe she was kidnapped.
If LE believe someone took Suzanne I do think the public should be warned that they think she was abducted.
A 'be on the alert' if nothing else.
Along with a description of when she was last seen outside of the family and also what she was wearing.
The fact that LE haven't described her bike, where it was located, and its' condition is troubling.
The silence makes it appear that LE don't think this is what happened.
So, no danger to the public at large as in LE think whatever may have happened to Suzanne was within her circle of family or acquaintances.
Not just persons known to Suzanne, but to her husband as well.
Sorry if that wasn't clear.
But even
IF LE think she was abducted... would it be premature to tell the public to be on the lookout for Suzanne ?
My .02 is no and for other missing persons cases there was a final photo and in some cases a "last seen here" video.