I read the DM article. I suspect that JP was paid nicely by the Daily Mail to share his story. I am suspicious that it may have be embellished.
I am inclined to believe that;
BM booked the room and JP took over the room.
That BM was at the hotel, as the Daily mail confirmed that the HOTEL handed over the hotel video to LE.
What I take with a big grain of salt is;
The mail may be irrelevant, perhaps some paperwork that he brought for work etc. It is unlikely that BM would casually leave important evidence casually tossed in a hotel trash can.
The room reeked of chlorine and there were wet towels on the floor. This Holiday Inns express has a pool (which was closed, which maybe JP was unaware of). JP may have added this scenario for drama. It is easily explained away if questioned by LE. chlorine is typically used in pools. Bleach is typically associated with 'clean ups'. The wording makes me suspicious.
JP did not see BM which makes the time line fuzzy.
SM stopped texting at 2.30pm
SM was seen later than previously thought? Could this be connected?
I am inclined to believe that;
BM booked the room and JP took over the room.
That BM was at the hotel, as the Daily mail confirmed that the HOTEL handed over the hotel video to LE.
What I take with a big grain of salt is;
The mail may be irrelevant, perhaps some paperwork that he brought for work etc. It is unlikely that BM would casually leave important evidence casually tossed in a hotel trash can.
The room reeked of chlorine and there were wet towels on the floor. This Holiday Inns express has a pool (which was closed, which maybe JP was unaware of). JP may have added this scenario for drama. It is easily explained away if questioned by LE. chlorine is typically used in pools. Bleach is typically associated with 'clean ups'. The wording makes me suspicious.
JP did not see BM which makes the time line fuzzy.
SM stopped texting at 2.30pm
SM was seen later than previously thought? Could this be connected?
Last edited: