Found Deceased CO - Suzanne Morphew, 49, did not return from bike ride, Chaffee County, 10 May 2020 #47

Status
Not open for further replies.

Have we watched this? Dont know if this is old news from Lauren S.
Interesting.
Lauren. About 6 minute mark. Anonymous source from Indiana company says they were contacted May 12 concerning the workers in Broomfield. Tony was convinced that the workers had something to do with Suzanne's disappearance. Did someone try to frame them???
Moo
 
Allegedly SM was alive on Saturday May 9th at least up to some point that morning or afternoon. Supposedly she and BM were spotted getting sandwiches around 4pm that day. I don't know if that's correct or not, but that's what has been said.

So if BM was pre-planning her demise, it seemed to have taken place on Saturday, at the most about 11 hours from the time his truck's engine was heard by MG at her apartment building. I think he may have been planning for it but maybe was a bit flexible on exactly 'when' within those few days.

IMO

BBM:

I don't buy the sammy sighting at all.

I'm skeptical that SM was alive on Saturday.

I just don't think secondhand reports of texts being exchanged are enough to indicate proof of life, so I'm really keeping a completely open mind when it comes to the timeline.

Per Lauren's report, the girls supposedly left to go camping on Wednesday.
LE asked people in the area to preserve their footage between the dates of May 8th - May 12th.

We definitely need to add the IN worker being notified on Wednesday, May 7th that a crew would be working on that wall on Monday, May 11th to our timeline.

JMO.
 
Last edited:
I really hope that CBI or FBI searches that job site in Broomfield. It’s hard to imagine that BM would be so careless as to try to bury her there but then maybe he could send the crew out there On Sunday and if anything was discovered, try to pin things on “meth heads” and “ex convicts” working at the site, so who knows? Anyone know of it has been searched?

Aren’t those buildings just right next to the wall inhabited? I can’t imagine if they are, the people wouldn’t be looking outside to see what kind of work is going on making noice and disturbance on Mother’s Day. I don’t think even BM would be that stupid to burry SM in a clear view of those buildings when there are countless number of places to do it in Colorado where nobody else is around.

If they aren’t inhabited, it could be a possibility, but a tiny one on my list.
It seems more like an alibi. A failing one at that.
 
Azz-umptions?
@Love Never Fails
Is it a fact that CBI or other LE agency has not investigated or searched there in Broomfield ?
Or is it possible CBI or other agency investigated & searched there but did not release that or findings to the public?
Rambling about possibilities. Jm2cts.
I agree with you. It is just that Lauren’s video led me to believe CBI did not follow up with information from Brookfield. I don’t know Lauren’s source but that person did not believe CBI had followed up. If CBI had conducted a search for Suzanne under the wall I would think we would have heard. Just my opinion.
 
BBM:

I don't buy the sammy sighting at all.

I'm skeptical that SM was alive on Saturday.

Agree. The timeline has morphed quite a bit around Friday & Saturday.

We definitely need to add the IN worker being notified on Wednesday, May 7th that a crew would be working on that wall on Monday, May 11th to our timeline.

IN worker notified but yet no materials ordered to actually do the job by BM and the tools needed to do the job weren't there either, just lots of tools not needed.
 
Barry never ordered the materials for his workers to do the job. There was no load of stone coming, as MG was told and thought. It appears to have been a ruse to get himself and his workers up to Broomfield and create this urgency to fix a wall, that wasn't urgent and for which the necessary materials and tools weren't available.

Oh Barry. You so busted, dude.

IMO
Hard to believe his lack of thought in creating this alibi. One should have the common sense to know LE will thoroughly review your alibi.
 

Okay.

Everybody, hang in here with me for a minute.

The dude Lauren interviewed back in Indiana said that he learned on May 7th that a crew would be going back to work on that retaining wall on May 11th.

May 7th.

That's Thursday.

We really need to think about the implications of this.

Specifically, the implications of this r/t both the timeline and the question of premeditation.

Per the worker LS interviewed, BM had no reason to feel rushed to do that job.

It wasn't urgent. There was no looming deadline to get it completed.

Which means that BM had his own reasons for wanting to get this rush job scheduled that had nothing to do with the contractor breathing down his neck.

Two possibilities:

1) SM "disappeared" much earlier than we think.

2) This crime was premeditated well in advance.

Thoughts?

JMO.
I’ve always believed this was premeditated by Barry, we just don’t know why. Yet.
 
Interesting.
Lauren. About 6 minute mark. Anonymous source from Indiana company says they were contacted May 12 concerning the workers in Broomfield. Tony was convinced that the workers had something to do with Suzanne's disappearance. Did someone try to frame them???
Moo
bbm
How awful for anyone who may have unknowingly done a 'job' at BM's behest and weren't aware that the bobcat or other tools may have been used in a murder.
MOO
 
To me, the urgency to get there sooner than he needed to be there, lends more credibility to the idea that "it" was a sudden, unplanned thing, that NOW he needed to cover up. Since he was expected to be up in Broomfield on Monday anyway, he bumped the timeline up.

jmo
Bam!!!
 
To me, the urgency to get there sooner than he needed to be there, lends more credibility to the idea that "it" was a sudden, unplanned thing, that NOW he needed to cover up. Since he was expected to be up in Broomfield on Monday anyway, he bumped the timeline up.

jmo
I don't think we know the precise time the Morphew daughters were originally expected back from their camping trip (which according to Lauren began Wed, May 6), but I vaguely recall that there was some delay, so they returned later on Sunday than originally planned. I am curious to know when BM learned of the delay.

Regardless, it seems to me that BM must have taken into consideration the timing of the daughters' return and planned the early Sunday departure to make sure he was out of town plenty long enough to create the appearance that SM disappeared in his absence and several hours after he left. ETA: He couldn't leave later in the afternoon because then he'd risk the daughters showing up too close to when he left.

So, IMO, if what we've heard is true, BM faked SM's persona on social media Saturday afternoon to delay suspicion about SM's well-being until Sunday and then he made tracks out of town early Sunday so any inquiries into SM's well-being would be met initially with silence and, once it was obvious she was missing, what BM hoped was a solid alibi for BM.

Murder of the mother of one's daughters is bad enough, but arranging things such that THEY are the ones who initially discover her missing (and on Mother's Day, no less) is a whole greater level of evil.
 

Okay.

Everybody, hang in here with me for a minute.

The dude Lauren interviewed back in Indiana said that he learned on May 7th that a crew would be going back to work on that retaining wall on May 11th.

May 7th.

That's Thursday.

We really need to think about the implications of this.

Specifically, the implications of this r/t both the timeline and the question of premeditation.

Per the worker LS interviewed, BM had no reason to feel rushed to do that job.

It wasn't urgent. There was no looming deadline to get it completed.

Which means that BM had his own reasons for wanting to get this rush job scheduled that had nothing to do with the contractor breathing down his neck.

Two possibilities:

1) SM "disappeared" much earlier than we think.

2) This crime was premeditated well in advance.

Thoughts?

JMO.
Ya Bam!!!
 
Interesting.
Lauren. About 6 minute mark. Anonymous source from Indiana company says they were contacted May 12 concerning the workers in Broomfield. Tony was convinced that the workers had something to do with Suzanne's disappearance. Did someone try to frame them???
Moo
That is where my mind went. Especially after Lauren contacted him and Tony said: "No Comment"!
 
I don't think we know the precise time the Morphew daughters were originally expected back from their camping trip (which according to Lauren began Wed, May 6), but I vaguely recall that there was some delay, so they returned later on Sunday than originally planned. I am curious to know when BM learned of the delay.

Regardless, it seems to me that BM must have taken into consideration the timing of the daughters' return and planned the early Sunday departure to make sure he was out of town plenty long enough to create the appearance that SM disappeared in his absence and several hours after he left. ETA: He couldn't leave later in the afternoon because then he'd risk the daughters showing up too close to when he left.

So, IMO, if what we've heard is true, BM faked SM's persona on social media Saturday afternoon to delay suspicion about SM's well-being until Sunday and then he made tracks out of town early Sunday so any inquiries into SM's well-being would be met initially with silence and, once it was obvious she was missing, what BM hoped was a solid alibi for BM.

Murder of the mother of one's daughters is bad enough, but arranging things such that THEY are the ones who initially discover her missing (and on Mother's Day, no less) is a whole greater level of evil.
bbm
Ita.
Monstrous. :(
Imo.
 
So the wall and the motel room were never visited by LE because... why?

A) LE didn’t get around to it
B) Neither the wall or the motel are relevant
C) LE was at both sites, we just don’t know it
D) None of the above
C. We know they seized video from the hotel and from nearby businesses. They wouldn’t do that and not visit both relevant locations (hotel and wall).

The sheriff referenced the number of searches and warrants that have been executed, a number that exceeds 130.

We don’t know the half of it.
 
Did you get the impression at the beginning that LS had this info for some time and now is releasing it?

Interesting....
I think she’s had it for several weeks, but lost her forum (station). She teased it a while back, before the search I believe.

She was relegated to writing articles, and now it appears she may be out on her own.

What’s great though, is she won’t be restricted in what she can share.
 
C. We know they seized video from the hotel and from nearby businesses. They wouldn’t do that and not visit both relevant locations (hotel and wall).

The sheriff referenced the number of searches and warrants that have been executed, a number that exceeds 130.

We don’t know the half of it.
Agreed.

LE know who went into or out of that hotel room, and what they had with them.

If there are outside security cams, LE know exactly what BM had in his truck (toolbox, igloo coolers, sterilite containers, etc.) and if & when the contents of that truck or truck bed changed.
I.e., coolers that were visible in some footage but later were missing, etc.
Imo.
 
So the wall and the motel room were never visited by LE because... why?

A) LE didn’t get around to it
B) Neither the wall or the motel are relevant
C) LE was at both sites, we just don’t know it
D) None of the above
Maybe I misunderstood. But I thought I heard LS say it was Broomfield LE that didn't investigate the motel room not Susannes investigative team.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Staff online

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
165
Guests online
942
Total visitors
1,107

Forum statistics

Threads
626,204
Messages
18,522,364
Members
240,971
Latest member
Archangel Tara
Back
Top