Okay.
Everybody, hang in here with me for a minute.
The dude Lauren interviewed back in Indiana said that he learned on
May 7th that a crew would be going back to work on that retaining wall on May 11th.
May 7th.
That's Thursday.
We really need to think about the implications of this.
Specifically, the implications of this r/t both the timeline and the question of premeditation.
Per the worker LS interviewed, BM had no reason to feel rushed to do that job.
It wasn't urgent. There was no looming deadline to get it completed.
Which means that BM had his own reasons for wanting to get this rush job scheduled that had nothing to do with the contractor breathing down his neck.
Two possibilities:
1) SM "disappeared" much earlier than we think.
2) This crime was premeditated well in advance.
Thoughts?
JMO.