Really? Well if you are right then I will be so disappointed. When I hear PE say things like we have significant information and we have known it for awhile but don’t want to jeopardize the investigation it sounds very credible to me. If they were just speculating would they put their reputations on the line like that? Maybe I’m just gullible and drinking up the Koolaid!
This was my first case that I have followed and I’ve definitely learned some hard lessons along the way. I’m also new to YouTube and the monetization of it all. But they all have to do that and I understand many YT creators say certain things or string us along so people will come back or join their membership. PE has to create content to keep viewers coming back to stay competitive. But I don’t think they would intentionally lie or mislead their viewers. Mike and Chris have integrity and solid backgrounds (in my opinion). I fully agree they have “teased” us repeatedly with the “five” clue but I really thought that was because one of them got carried away and revealed more than they should have so they have been dragging it out until it is safe to disclose the meaning. That’s why I was shocked by what Chris said last night on their members live chat. And yes I get that they want viewers to pay for a membership and they want to give members something extra to make it worth it, etc. but I believe what they are saying.
I think PE have deep long standing LE connections specifically with the CBI & FBI not the CCSO. I realize CBI or FBI can’t technically give out information about an active investigation to PE but I think colleagues or “brothers in blue” have a way of discussing and sharing things unofficially. I think it happens and perhaps PE shared too many hints about things told to them in confidence. Maybe whoever gave them this information is not happy with them at all about it and will not be discussing anything further with PE from now on so they don’t know if the five areas have been searched or not or if anything was found. I got the impression that PE was sort of working
with LE on the public crowd sourcing side of the investigation and might have also done a lot to help them so they both benefit. It’s hard to work together without sharing information.
I don’t know...but I respect your opinion
@K9Enzo and it seems like there are others that agree with you. I thought there were a lot of others like me who still want to get to the bottom of what the “five” clue meant so that’s why I brought it to the thread again. I’m sorry if I annoyed anyone though!
Edited to make those pesky paragraphs.