- Joined
- Mar 23, 2020
- Messages
- 544
- Reaction score
- 8,378
SBMRSBM
- 2:44 when GD arrived at the bike scene and witnessed 2 CCSD on site attempting to bring the bike up the hill, GD is quoted as saying was a "giant no-no", and went on to explain basic crime scene processing protocol, to these two county sherrifs. Went on to relay how there were "a lot" of things the sheriff's office did like that, but chalked it up to them being a small town LE agency and don't see this kind of crime and don't know everything.
Wow.
Shows up and tells the police how to do their jobs, then accuses them of being ignorant small town cops. Okay.
In addition, why in the world would GD be so adamant that the bike was a "crime scene" and should be processed like one, when no one was supposed to have known yet, what happened to her? No one was supposed to have known anything at that point, accident, run off on purpose, kidnapped, whatever. Yet there's GD on scene, insisting it's processed as a crime scene.
That's also just too weird.
At 1:25 in the video, LS said that GD says he has >10 years of LE experience. I'm not sure what that experience is (military cop or something?), but if true then I could see that making him feel qualified to criticize how local LE handled the initial hours of the investigation. And if they did bring the bike up so quickly then that does seem like a mistake, though I could understand why they weren't treating it like a crime scene at the time.
The fact that he so adamantly dismissed the animal attack theory makes me trust him a bit more. And that he talked to AM, assuming that's true. Perhaps just a case of misplaced loyalty on his part. It's interesting that he was so willing to talk. It didn't sound like LS had tried to contact him before. She'd just taken BM's word that he didn't want to talk to her.