Ames: "no evidence at all" and "all over the crime scene" are what I'm talking about. Murri's right that's a bit disingenuous and it's simply not factual.
I believe staging means: arranged: deliberately arranged for effect only...it's meant to be a deceptive practice to fool someone into thinking something other than what happened, happened.
I keep hearing people say the garotte was "staging" but JonBenet was strangled with that cord enough to cause a deep furrow that encircled her entire neck and cause petechial hemorrhaging and enough for the coroner to rule her death as caused by strangulation.
So if you believe PR did it, then you must follow that JB was either bashed in the skull hard and then while she lay possibly dying, instead of calling 911, she got John, they wrote a lengthy note, gathered up some tape and cord, got a paintbrush from the paint box, broke it, tied some fancy knots and then strangled their daughter, sexually violated her, and disposed of the other end of the paintbrush, the rest of the tape, the rest of the cord, but left a practice note.
The fibers from PR's clothing being in her things, on JB and in the house in general is not unusual because she lived there. So that can be explained and it's good evidence if everything else fits, but so many other things do not fit so standing on it's own it's a featherweight.
But there were other fibers that they were unable to match and those may or may not be important too but they offer some possibility that they may have belonged to a perpetrator that was not a Ramsey. Standing on their own they too don't mean much.
In fact neither side has really super duper solid evidence but I think the DNA is weightier and I think as time has gone by an intruder theory has become more plausible than the scenario above and that is why the tide has turned slightly.
