I think if we accept the report that she was seeking conservatorship- there had to have been doctors involved. While there may be exceptions to this, they are rare. I am familiar with the workings in CA -but not CT so here we go:
At the hearing for involuntary representation, the court shall receive
evidence regarding the respondent’s condition, the respondent’s capacity to
care for himself or herself or to manage his or her affairs, and the
respondent’s ability to meet his or her needs without the appointment of a
conservator. Unless it is waived by the court, the petitioner is required to
present medical evidence about the respondent's condition and its effect on
the respondent’s ability to care for himself or herself or to manage his or her
affairs from one or more physicians licensed to practice medicine in
Connecticut. The physician(s) must have examined the respondent within 45
days of the hearing. In certain circumstances, the court may waive the
requirement of medical evidence, but the judge must state the reason for
doing so.
In addition to the medical evidence provided by the petitioner, the court may,
if it finds it necessary, order the examination of the respondent by another
physician, a psychiatrist, or a psychologist. However, the respondent may
refuse to undergo any examination ordered by the court. The fees for such an
examination will be assessed against the petitioner, the respondent, or the
party requesting the exam. If the party is unable to pay for the examination,
payment will be made by the Probate Court Administration Fund.
http://www.jud.state.ct.us/probate/GuidelinesConservators.pdf