JS is asking him about 5/24. Whether he was there on NC all day.
PG still can't recall whether he went to lunch or not that day.
JS: you were aware there was surveillance? From across the street?
Objection.
Judge says again, this is a waste of time. It's not impeachment by a prior inconsistent statement.
JS says this is impeachment.
Sustained.
JS: isn't it true that you weren't at 61 Sturbridge at all that afternoon? PG continues to say he was there from 10 to 2:30 and he doesn't recall if he went to lunch that day.
JS starts asking if the police told you
Objection, hearsay and improper impeachment
Judge says this is a waste of time. But overrules.
JS calls up a still of video from the house across from 61 Sturbridge from 5/19
White vehicle in the photo, PG can't identify the vehicle as the Jeep Cherokee.
PG believes he had the Raptor for two weeks.
Video still from 5/24 at 1pm, no vehicle
JS: isn't it true that the police had no video of you in the afternoon and you had no explanation?
Objection, overruled
PG doesn't recall them saying they had no video.
JS wants to play a clip of PG's interview
State requests reviewing it first
….. wow ~54 years ago…..
