CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, deceased/not found, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #62

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #581
We're live. Jury entering.

Defendant has introduced a new variation on beige -- camel jacket.
 
  • #582
It’s actually not uncommon for divorcing parents to be precluded from having new significant others present when the kids are. Jennifer was also precluded from having a new boyfriend around (not tgat she had one, or had time for one) when she was with the kids. And she had the kids most of the time. But she particularly did not want Michelle and her daughter present, because of some behaviors that may have been related to her by the children.
Yeah

The no bf/gf rule was likely boiler plate. And it's easier to start that way on new visitation and loosen it than vice-versa.

Insofar as it was specific to this case, it was specific to Fotis' behavior of telling his children to lie about her. That's worse than anything MT could have said, because the children should have been confident in Fotis' guidance far more than MT's.

IMO
 
  • #583
Detective Clark, still on the stand.

Document is the Cellebrite report. READ means clicked on, opened and viewed.

Witness added boxes and arrows to the report.

[Who is operating the feed????? I am going to get seasick!]
 
  • #584
It’s actually not uncommon for divorcing parents to be precluded from having new significant others present when the kids are. Jennifer was also precluded from having a new boyfriend around (not tgat she had one, or had time for one) when she was with the kids. And she had the kids most of the time. But she particularly did not want Michelle and her daughter present, because of some behaviors that may have been related to her by the children.
I don't disagree with you on this at all.

I think though that the Dulos v Dulos case had circumstances where JF had very real concern about the person MT spending time with her children. Sometimes BFs and GFs etc. are allowed and splitting partners are ok with it. In this case JF was NOT OK with it and she had a long list of reasons why.

The other issue is that originally there was more flexibility in the visitation arrangements for FD but with the caveat that MT and her daughter not be present. It became a sick game with FD and MT imo to play games with the childrens heads and have the lie to JF about MT and her daughter being at 4JX or off skiing with them etc. We saw in the LE Interviews that MT was angry at having to take her daughter away from 4Jx when the children visited and I bet she made FD life hell on earth on this issue every time the children came.

Manipulation from FD and MT was extreme and was psychologically damaging to JF as well as the children which is why Court intervention was also quite extreme. FD was denied visitation for a period and had mandated Court Order to seeing mental health counselling to address a series of issues identified by the Judge associated with how HE AND MT had treated the children and JF. The supervised visitation had to also be enraging for FD as he was effectively being treated as a child and watched and listened to and reported on each and every time he saw his children. Can you imagine the ego wounding and damage this inflicted on narc FD? MT fuelled this imo and the rest of the sad story we are hearing about in the this sad trial.

IMO there was no way with what all was going on in Family Court that MT could say that FD was 'WINNING" and that she would be the mother of 6 with FD having full custody unless she was both incredible stupid and delusional. Facts simply don't support thinking or believing even visitation conditions would change anytime soon around the time of the JF Murder.

MOO
 
  • #585
I get the feeling that something is coming up that JS doesn’t want to come in.

Was MT reading some of these messages on FD’s phone?
 
  • #586
5:57:31am message incoming whatsapp foreign language

7:37.05 Facebook message incoming file not accessible

No way to determine when they were opened.

9:44.01 missed incoming call on whatsapp

[State's exhibit is cut off -- only a fraction is visible on this feed!!!]
 
  • #587
Witness is identifying incoming activity on FD's phone between 5:35am and 12:22 pm through other apps. Whatsapp and facebook.
 
  • #588
I get the feeling that something is coming up that JS doesn’t want to come in.

Was MT reading some of these messages on FD’s phone?
I possibly no outgoing calls?
 
  • #589
Cellebrite call log between 5:35 and 12:22

1st incoming call was at 7:16am. Duration 0000 missed
Incoming call Andreas 8:26am answered 17 seconds duration
Incoming call. Hutch Haynes 9:02. Missed call 00
Incoming calls Renia

Ugh. I can't see the exhibit! Series of unanswered calls.
 
  • #590
Call returned at 1:19.... outgoing.
 
  • #591
8:26 was the only answered call.
 
  • #592
WhatsApp string. From FD to Andreas. Sent 5/23 5:53pm. Another sent around 10 pm. Another at 10:25.

Greek to English translation: call me tomorrow morning at mine and we'll talk

3:30 yours

At the normal
 
  • #593
??????
Greek to English translation: call me tomorrow morning at mine and we'll talk
 
  • #594
Yeah

The no bf/gf rule was likely boiler plate. And it's easier to start that way on new visitation and loosen it than vice-versa.

Insofar as it was specific to this case, it was specific to Fotis' behavior of telling his children to lie about her. That's worse than anything MT could have said, because the children should have been confident in Fotis' guidance far more than MT's.

IMO
Agree.
Just to be clear though MT was involved with having the children lie and she also used her daughter to communicate with the Dulos children on behalf of the couple when FD lost access.
MOO
 
  • #595
About the only thing I’ve seen on the screen in the last 30 mins.. why are they not showing the screen ?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5356.png
    IMG_5356.png
    353.6 KB · Views: 26
  • #596
Watching a video message from Andreas

"A. You can spend the rest of your life with your wife or B!"
 
  • #597
Watching a video message

"A. You can spend the rest of your life with your wife or B!"
From Andreas? I don't think I caught it.
 
  • #598
Agree.
Just to be clear though MT was involved with having the children lie and she also used her daughter to communicate with the Dulos children on behalf of the couple when FD lost access.
MOO
Do we know this for a fact? Or is it just speculation?
 
  • #599
Like anything but spend rest of life with wife. That gif shows Andreas knew … and MT answered the call …
 
  • #600
Agree.
Just to be clear though MT was involved with having the children lie and she also used her daughter to communicate with the Dulos children on behalf of the couple when FD lost access.
MOO
True- MT actively supported his emotionally abusive parenting. But the judge only held the responsible party (responsible for parenting his own offspring) accountable for stopping it.

MOO
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
66
Guests online
3,030
Total visitors
3,096

Forum statistics

Threads
632,590
Messages
18,628,847
Members
243,207
Latest member
aseldner
Back
Top