kimch33kim
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jun 17, 2019
- Messages
- 1,064
- Reaction score
- 11,950
LOL at this new attorney. MTs daughter lives in Argentina w/her father. Nothing that the state of CT is doing would prevent MT from seeing her daughter in her small condo in CT if someone were willing to send her. Can MT go to Argentina to see her daughter ? No.
LOL at this new attorney. MTs daughter lives in Argentina w/her father. Nothing that the state of CT is doing would prevent MT from seeing her daughter in her small condo in CT if someone were willing to send her. Can MT go to Argentina to see her daughter ? No.
Ah, she worships at the altar of Howard Schultz and Redken.MT still gets out of her house and goes to Starbucks and hair appointments as a religious or work reason sop I don't know what she whining about now. JMO
Oh boy,LOL at this new attorney. MTs daughter lives in Argentina w/her father. Nothing that the state of CT is doing would prevent MT from seeing her daughter in her small condo in CT if someone were willing to send her. Can MT go to Argentina to see her daughter ? No.
I Love this post! I too believe that we should try and locate Jennifer. @MilanaCapricorn do you have any thoughts where Jennifer could be located?
Regarding the date Fd committed suicide this is the first report I've seen that tags times on the movements of a person that sounds to be AC times mentioned 11:18am (arrives), 11:28am (leaves), 11:54am (phone call for welfare check to FPD).
@kimch33kim, do you know if MT has been papped doing these activities? If so, I would suggest sending them off to Judge Blawie or White and Atty Colangelo asap as I simply don't see them as being part of the original intention for someone with a murder charge levelled against them by the State.MT still gets out of her house and goes to Starbucks and hair appointments as a religious or work reason sop I don't know what she whining about now. JMO
LOL exactlyLol, I thought the attorney meant nearby, like GM condo or school residence. Argentina? It is hardly violating her rights.
@curiousinCT, you are so so smart! So glad you are here!Brilliant. I can't believe nobody has tried that yet!
OP doesn't think JDF is amongst the living though; they clearly stated they believe JFD is dead.
I think OP's point is being misunderstood; they want more discussion based on evidence and fact. They want efforts here to be concentrated on figuring out where JFD is, dead or alive (although the majority of us, OP included, believe the unfortunate reality is that JFD, if found, will be dead).
As this case has progressed, it's impossible for members not to become emotionally invested and form strong opinions. Earlier in this case, discussion was much more evidence-based; as time has progressed, posts have shifted to becoming less about "facts" and more about guesses and opinions, which is natural when so much time has passed and only so much new evidence is presented to the public.
Or I'm completely wrong about OP's intentions, but that's how it read to me. MOO.
Good idea aftizy. I will forward the information on to the appropriate people maybe you can help me. Sentinel are the people recording her movements and approving these things. it's unbelievable what MT can get away with!!!!!@kimch33kim, do you know if MT has been papped doing these activities? If so, I would suggest sending them off to Judge Blawie or White and Atty Colangelo asap as I simply don't see them as being part of the original intention for someone with a murder charge levelled against them by the State.
My recollection of the bond restrictions were: house arrest except for legal, medical and religious. As MT doesn't work she didn't get the work restriction that Fd had (and later lost).
How do you think that Starbucks and Hair fit into the legal, medical, and religious categories?
I do very much wonder if the Parole folks understand what house arrest is supposed to be and what the restrictions are as I'm not seeing a pasta pickup and coffee break fitting into any of those categories?
Does anyone understand what the Parole folks might be thinking about here?
MOO
IMO, they know where Jennifers remains are. Will they say, that depends on what LE offers up.1. They don't know
2. Knowing makes them culpable
I'm wondering if AB was insisting on a plea deal, and MT refused, hence the separation of ways.
Good to hear that this can be done.Th
Good idea aftizy. I will forward the information on to the appropriate people maybe you can help me. Sentinel are the people recording her movements and approving these things. it's unbelievable what MT can get away with!!!!!
She just needs to “muck” about town.MT still gets out of her house and goes to Starbucks and hair appointments as a religious or work reason sop I don't know what she whining about now. JMO
And I know of five children who haven’t seen their mother in 8 months and never will.Well her new attorney is trying to sneak this “poor me I cannot see my daughter...who when she is not living or visiting me lives and attends school with her dad in Argentina”.
This needs to be investigated....just who is the daughter with and what time of year. IF with the father, then someone is blowing smoke. If with MT, we would have heard about this a long time ago.
MT has lied before, so no reason to trust her. Is she lying to her new lawyer? IMO yes.
IMO the last lawyer is probably so glad to move on!
I guess mommy and daddy are paying for the new lawyer.....
She did the crime (lying many times) she serves the time (house arrest whether in a mansion or one room apartment or condo).
What no one can drive her daughter to her?! Maybe Attorney Schoenhorn can lend a helping hand?@SabinaKuriakose
SCHOENHORN: Conditions of Troconis house arrest are unconstitutional, she lives in small condo and can't visit her 15 year old daughter
This is JMO, but also I think we need to keep in mind that there is probably a lot more evidence that we are not aware of yet.IMO, I think the OP is referring to the opinion of the ME who was shown the evidence gathered during the investigation, where he said something along the lines of, the person who sustained these injuries/lost this amount of blood, would have died without medical intervention. Following the OPs thinking, there is immediate doubt here. It is just one opinion and is not concrete proof. Say for instance there was a trial, i have no doubt that defence counsel would produce their own expert to counter/denounce/provide an alternative opinion.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.