Still Missing CT - Jennifer Dulos, 50, New Canaan, 24 May 2019 *ARRESTS* #61

[afitzy]

Yes it was. And this is the same PG who told FD not to do anything stupid when FD was asking an AV expert about whether specific items appearing on a photo of the home at 69 Welles Ln might be cameras. To me, that implies awareness that FD wasn't beyond doing something seriously wrong to serve his own interests.

Imagine how PG must have felt about the "lawyers playing games" comment, as well as the comment about JD's parenting capabilities. And then they take his truck and have it detailed and FD wants him to change out the seats. PG was being flailed with red flags from every direction.

And to think PG innocently greeted FD on the afternoon of 5/24 with a comment about how FD was "trying to look as handsome as I am." Chilling in retrospect.

We still don't know if FD did put a camera at Welles as has been suspected by many folks here but never confirmed by LE or AAs.
MOO

 

[Aquarian]

State asks if the subject of the keys come up on the 28th?

FD asked PG what he remembered from the 24th. FD told PG let's not mention them MT had the key.

Really seems to me they were trying to set him up. I wonder if Pg will be asked that directly in some way.

 

[afitzy]

PG loaded some mirrors and plumbing/shower heads into the Jeep.

Looked in his Tacoma. Saw a pail with a blue hoodie.

Atty McGuinness asks PG to describe what was in the bucket.

JS asks for a sidebar.

Ah....I think this must be the hoodie that "Esteemed Defence Counsel" held on to for a whole year and withheld the evidence from LE and then threatened the State by saying he planned to use it to exonerate his client. State tried to have him removed from the case. IMO "Esteemed Defence Counsel" should have been charged with tampering and hindering. I think this evidence was removed from the trial but I'm not sure what is going on now. MOO

 

[Megnut]

Judge is schooling the jury about evidence that needs to be discussed outside of the jury. When counsel disagree on what can be admitted.

Jury being removed.

 

[Gardenista]

MT's hair was found on the hoodie. One of those high DNA number's - a gazillion times more likely to be her than anyone else.

 

[Megnut]

JS: discovery of blue hooded sweatshirt, in a red bucket. Witness relocated it to the mudroom at 4 JC.

It was turned over to the Court, then LE.

PG denied owning it but later said he might have had one.

JS is describing a complex series of events. He had to get an attorney. Issues of client attorney privilege.

JS says the sweatshirt was supposed to be as if it never existed. He says if it's going to be brought up, he gets to cross.

He says the sweatshirt is irrelevant.... and there's no way to lay the foundation for it.

He would have to cross PG on his initial denial.

Irrelevant and prejudicial.

JS: PG and his prevarication. [Ugh]

 

[afitzy]

Lots of smoke….from “esteemed defence Counsel”…

 

[citygirl]

Jury must be frustrated by all this in and out.
Could backfire on the defense.
MOO.

 

[BUF]

McGuinness setting the record straight of what happened with JS and that hoodie with MT’s hair and the tools with MT’s DNA.

 

[marcom]

And absolutely false and vile. I hope PG pursues legal action for defamation against Mama Troconis, MT and the rest of their Crew. They have been accusing him in a not very subtle way now for 4 years! It was and is shameful and I don't think they should get away with what they have done to this man. Simply wrong imo.
MOO

Still can't find the tweets and have searched by "Latest" and "Top." Unrelated, I was thinking that poor Pawel needs to be paid back for all the sleepless nights, fear and inconvenience caused to him and his family over the past 5 years.

 

[Gardenista]

If anyone wants to read the state's motion to disqualify

CT v Troconis - State's Motion to Disqualify Schoenhorn

www.documentcloud.org

 

[Megnut]

State:

TaraKnight had a box of evidence.

Letter from JS, tools and a sweatshirt in the box

PG was a contributor by DNA testing. As well as MT's hair and her DNA on the tools.

State: the defense wants to say PG was the bike riders

State said if you introduce the sweatshirt, I will have to call you as a witness.

Prepared to DQ JS.

JS would agree not to use those items, then JS would not be called as a witness.

The State : there is no stipulation whereby the State can't introduce the sweatshirt.

State: Complete distortion of the facts.

Provides the Judge with the stipulated agreement

 

[Aquarian]

McGinnis is ticked

 

[nodamselindistress]

Such shady shenanigans!

 

[afitzy]

Still can't find the tweets and have searched by "Latest" and "Top." Unrelated, I was thinking that poor Pawel needs to be paid back for all the sleepless nights, fear and inconvenience caused to him and his family over the past 5 years.

Need a civil action to get that compensation…he has been tormented and that imo is totally wrong.
MOO

 

[afitzy]

Simply no words and I don’t understand why he wasn’t charged and disbarred. MOO

 

[Megnut]

Judge

Whether JS is going to be a necessary witness in the trial

The defendant (JS) will not reference those items, as if the box doesn't exist.

Judge asks about the bucket and the hoodie.

State says neither was in the box. And he can't be certain it's the same sweatshirt.

Judge will not litigate the stipulation.

JS says this opens the door for JS to cross examination of PG.

JS is arguing a technicality-- if the State brings it up, he can cross. And not violate his being a witness.

 

[shotgun09]

'THERE WAS NO BUCKET IN THE BOX " !!!!!!!!!!

you loose, JS

 

[Megnut]

Lord.

Now JS is testifying about the 3 second fuzzy video...

JS says he isn't going to introduce the contents of the box but if the State brings it up, he can cross. Thinks he isn't violating his stipulation.

Says LE made up the bike ride. Half hour away.

 

[Eli9]

So we don't expect to hear about the tools that were in the box? Or am I not understanding any of this.