I don't think the reporting is incompetent.
While the state can't release information, the parents have the right to ALL the info in their case file. I'm sure the reporters have seen the documentation regarding the removal of Justina and I'd be willing to bet it matches the Pelletier's account.
I've been a journalist for many years and can honestly say that most of the reporting, except for the Globe, was terrible. The blogs were the worst.
Using loaded, emotional words such as "kidnapped" and "seized" without attribution to the parents and rebuttal by the hospital or DCF in a news story is wrong and unethical. Repeating such "facts" put out by the family as the ER doctor was nothing more than an intern when in truth he had been a full-fledged doctor for 11 or more years is very wrong and unprofessional.
Too many reporters took the Pelletiers at their word and did not attempt to check the truthfulness of their ranting. Then other papers and blogs picked up those early unchecked statements and re-reported them as fact.
That is lousy journalism. IMO.
Here's some REAL documentation of what went down at BCH, from the Globe:
http://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyl...ssachusetts/puyPhesGkKE6rGLid2VM2L/story.html
",,,,,,,The judges four-page decision, which was provided to the Globe, was remarkable for its detail and forcefulness. Johnston faulted Connecticuts child protection agency for its failure to get involved in a case involving a child from its state, and faulted Pelletiers parents for their verbally abusive manner and haphazard decision-making that he says has sabotaged plans to move their daughter closer to home.
Johnston wrote that the parents called Boston Childrens Hospital personnel Nazis and claimed the hospital was punishing and killing Justina. Efforts by hospital clinicians to work with the parents were futile and never went anywhere.
More recently, he wrote, there has not been any progress by the parents. Rather, the parents . . . continue to engage in very concerning conduct that does not give this court any confidence they will comply with conditions of custody. He noted that because of allegations that Justinas father, Lou Pelletier, threatened a state social worker assigned to the case, the worker had to be reassigned.