The standard that they not be affiliated in any way with the hospital as I understand it. No breach of testing protocol,medical qualifications or similar. Or maybe I missed something? Personally, I'm glad they brought in the guy from Stanford. I'm sure his conclusions carry a lot of weight and can't honestly be refuted. The only remaining argument is whether brain death is life in the same sense as comas, vegetative states or major brain injuries. I notice that the court filing doesn't even touch that issue and cites case law based on those other types of conditions. I guess they'll cross that bridge when they come to it. Interesting legal issues. Too bad it has to come up in this context.
mo
If the standard was that the two doctors could not be affiliated with the hospital then why did the hospital not follow the standard?
I think a video showing the patient reacting to her mother might also carry a lot of weight with a Court in deciding if such a patient meets the legal definition of death. These are very interesting legal issues but the failure of the hospital to follow the standard in evaluation for brain death does merit further investigation, imo.