Yes, by Calif law the cap is $250 K for wrongful death: it can go as high as $33 million (I think I read?) for severe "disability" damages (such as being on a ventilator).
Thank you :seeya:! I wanted to be sure I understood it correctly.
Yes, by Calif law the cap is $250 K for wrongful death: it can go as high as $33 million (I think I read?) for severe "disability" damages (such as being on a ventilator).
I'm no lawyer, but I agree !00%. Have been wondering if this attempt to redefine death as 'disability' is an engineered test case for this higher amount by the lawyer (who quite possibly also encourages his clients in this bent)...it would appear that he's mentioned those two numbers to his clients.
Fruity, I applaud you for having this discussion with your teen children!
As for updating Wills, this is a separate issue. You can find the forms for your state on the net...download, print, and execute them. They are not part of your Will (which we know from old movies could be read months later <g>).
In addition, you might want to consider a DNR.
And finally, imo, it is best to put your wishes in writing for disposition of your remains in an envelope taped to the front door jamb...altho many seem to prefer the freezer for such docs. ;-) Point is, you want those wishes (along with your Directives) easily found and read, should they be needed in any situation including an emergency.
Example from my state of California:
There are two basic kinds of health care documents: the Durable Power of Attorney for Health Care, naming a trusted person to direct your health care if you are unable to do so yourself, and the Living Will, setting out the types of medical treatment you would or would not like to receive in certain situations. You can also specify who you would is authorized to direct the disposition of your remains. In California, these two documents are combined into a single form called an Advance Health Care Directive (AHCD).
More here:
http://www.saclaw.lib.ca.us/pages/living-wills.aspx
I am not a lawyer so this post is meant only to suggest to its readers that you check your own State law and consult with an atty re your personal concerns.
~jmo~
On the way to Ohio, how's the weather there? I would hope all the news agencies would have their reporters checking out the Oakland airport. I think, though, New York may have been a smoke screen.
I don't know the answer to that. But since they let the mother take the body, presumably, if there is such a time constraint, they're not going to enforce it. I have been wondering about the details of this myself since I read the coroner saying they could release the body to the family to dispose of. It seems to me that failing to dispose of the body by an appropriate method withing a certain time frame would violate the law. But maybe, if it's in a facility and not presenting a health risk, they can do as they will. Disturbing precedent all around on this one, I'm afraid. jmo
Lt. Riddic Bowers of the Alameda County Coroners Bureau said that once the bureau issued a death certificate and a release form, a deceased persons relatives were free to dispose of the body according to their wishes.
I don't know that they HAVE to do an autopsy. The laws are here http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/displaycode?section=gov&group=27001-28000&file=27490-27512 but very dense! But it's going to be problematic for their lawsuit if the coroner can't ever do an investigation. That evidence has been disappearing by the day anyway, and who knows the condition by the time her heart stops. They may be relying on witness reports without any sort of accurate autopsy.
ITA. And their pain makes them want revenge, as the interview indicated. That mother wants CHO to pay. She'd like them ruined. It's just unfortunate because we don't know the real story, and hell is being brought down on this hospital devoted to children's care. I can understand wanting to see them suffer after what she's been through, but if someone would have just stepped in and tried to let time and grief take their course rather than pursuing various agendas....this would be a different story. JMO.
I think the only state she would not be considered legally dead is New Jersey.
So if they managed to take her to New Jersey, would they be then able to argue that she is severely disabled instead of dead?
Just saw this on my local news app:
http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?se...sleuths.com/forums/images/smilies/loveyou.gif
Bed time for me, peeps. Night all!
Dolan says regular work insurance will pay for outside facility... really?
An ambulance pulls into the secure area of Children's Hospital Oakland, Sunday, Jan. 5, 2014, in Oakland, Calif. The ambulance removed the body of 13-year-old Jahi McMath and she now is in the custody of her family. They are not disclosing her location. (D. Ross Cameron/Bay Area News Group)
Dolan says regular work insurance will pay for outside facility... really?
What is "regular work insurance"? Does he mean the mother's health insurance policy from her job at Home Depot is going to pay for care for a legally dead person?
If they pay for that, are they also going to be paying CHO for the additional 20 days of care given her?
Is he twisting their arm too with threat of a pain and suffering suit?
Apologies if this has been posted...Jahi being transported (photo)