Father says DNA could solve one of country’s biggest murder mysteries: Who killed JonBenét Ramsey #2

If there's one thing we have learned about the Ramseys over the years, it's that they were anything but a "normal" family. IMO both JR and PR were fixated on the wrong things in life. Perhaps when the money started rolling in they lost sight of some things. IMO they were both narcissists, especially JR but PR too. I can attest from personal experience that narcissists are twisted people.
Agree totally. Narcissists are the worst.
But what the heck was the GJ alluding to? What did they hear that lead them to that conclusion? IMO It’s nothing that’s publicly known so far? The SA? Yes..but one of them, the GJ thought was very, knowingly, dangerous. There must have been a witness(es) that broke that goodie goodie image in tiny little pieces. That is IMO an insane charge made against parents of a murdered child.
What more does it take for prosecution? How do you say the parents were monsters without saying they were monsters?
Those four True Bills
MOO
 
According to Mark Becker who was specifically asked about medical records in the AMA he did for Reddit, the Ramseys did sign a release for BR's medical records. The police have never divulged what they contain, which is appropriate given that he was a minor. This probably why so many people seem to think the records were sealed from the police.
Thanks for clarifying that. I somehow too believed that the records are still sealed from the LE. Do we know who from the LE have had access to read and learn what those records say?
The child psychologist did have some concerns about BR and abuse. She did want to do another interview, which was denied. She had hoped to explore the abuse question as well as his lack of emotions, seeming feelings of detachment from his sister and parents, and what she strongly felt was the effects on him of having to live in such a dysfunctional environment.

But she also expressed he did not show any signs of sociopathic behaviors or that he was responsible for what had happened. Det. Patterson who interviewed BR on 12/26 at the home of the Whites also felt that BR was not responsible for what happened to JBR.
That is so unfortunate that the child psychologist did not get a second chance to interview Burke IMO. Especially knowing that she did have some doubts about things on her mind.

But the interview was conducted on the 26th, on the same day it happened and before Burke knew that JonBenet was already found murdered. If he at that time still only knew that JonBenet was kidnapped and he really did spend the night in his room without knowing about anything else, there is no need for the child psychologist to feel that Burke was somehow responsible for what happened to JBR. IMO. I believe that the accident part and the kidnapping part were two separate occasions in Burkes mind, not involved to each other. And he was not questioned about the accident. All my opinion.
I do think however, that he knows more than he has told. Given what we know of the approximated TOD and that he was up, awake and downstairs much later than his parents said, I think it's very likely that he at least heard something. As I have mentioned before, there is evidence that suggests what happened started in JBR's bedroom. If he was back in his bed by that time, I believe it could be the same scenario that he related about the following morning......staying in bed afraid to get out. One of the details that has always stood out to me as being very odd, is both PR and JR relating that they never asked him if he had heard or seen anything. To this day JR has said in interviews that they have never discussed that, they have never asked him those questions. Instead he says that IF BR had heard or seen something he would've said so, apparently that is the reason why they never asked. Huh?? That makes no sense to me. IMO it's more likely that they simply told him, no matter what you heard or saw, you will never, ever talk about it to anyone.
I too believe that he knows more than he has told. If not on the 26th, then at least in his later statements and interviews. I see him as an "innocent little boy" in his statements (not innocent for the accident but of only for what he actually knew) only on the days following the crime.

I know and accept other possibilities, but I write from the perspective of my theory. So I'll try to explain how I see it play out. I believe that he was sent to his bed after the accident and he stayed there. Sleeping or not, I do not know, but I somehow don't think a 9-year-old boy could have kept himself up in his room for the whole night. All is possible of course, but I think that as the cover up was mostly done in the basement, it was easy for him to not hear anything from there and fall asleep at some point in the night. All the parents had to do is close the basement door and do all the rest down there, discussing the plan, maybe even making a phone call from there (wasn't there a phone at the basement?), writing the note and crying over shock and despair. I do not think that Burke saw, heard or was present for that part of the night. IMO

But, after the plan was set and the cover up was done - in the early morning hours Patsy was "rehearsing" going "psycho" and get into the roll for the 9-1-1 call. That is what I believe Burke heard that and it woke him up and he left his room. Coming downstairs he heard Patsy making the 9-1-1 call and him heard talking on the enhanced tape could be possibly explained by that IMO. I wrote more about how what is heard on those tapes could line up with Burke coming down the stairs at that moment on another comment. IMO, it lines up with what he said in his interviews about John coming to his room and telling him that JB was kidnapped, hearing his mother scream and going psycho... IMO, it possibly was just that.

There is evidence that something bad had happened in JB's room before, as there was blood/staining found on her nightgown and bedding. That is a fact. But we do not really know time wise as a fact if it came that night, or maybe in the morning of 25th or when she was sexually assaulted before the murder. Unless we have some solid connection that the blood/staining found there is consistent with the mucus that was found and tested from JB's nose/mouth area. I don't think that we do, but correct me if I'm wrong please.
I do not dispute that it could not have started at her bedroom - of course it could have. But I have some doubts... Somehow I think that JonBenet did not make it to her bed after arriving home from the Whites, but it is only my opinion not a fact.

And Patsy and John maybe too were actually truthful (hard to believe, I know) when stating that they never asked Burke if he saw/heard anything or had any discussions about that matter with him. Maybe they knew the answer already - if he stayed in his bed for the night there is nothing to ask or discuss. Maybe they even went and checked on him a few times during the night to see if he stayed sound asleep in his room. IMO.
In one recent article, a friend of Burkes did state that Burke avoids the topic of JonBenet and never talks or wants to hear about it. I do not know how credible that statement actually is, but still. Now, if he really is an innocent brother who knows that his family is innocent too - wouldn't he be there trying to fight for justice and be heard and seen too, like John? But he hides and stays quiet. And he was hidden and shielded by his parents through the years when he was younger. Since the day of the murder, and even from the police. Police, who is there only to help and to protect the family from the foreign faction and find the murderer of his sister. Why wouldn't he want to help to solve the terrible murder of his little sister if that is all that it is...

Now it is all my opinion and I respect Your theory and all the other theories that are possibilities out there. I do not claim that I know how it really played out... I only wish I knew. I wish we all one day learn the truth...

And it sure seems that he has been silenced. By his parents and most likely by the attorneys too. Never talk... But I do have a slight hope for a confession... although very faint, it is still more then the hope in the DNA.
 
Last edited:
I have always interpreted it to point to both JR and PR, that each aided the other and that they each knew which one of them did what. They each had some guilty knowledge and they covered for each other.
That is a possibility and I quite often think about that too. But what bothers me with that is the exact wording that the GJ chose.

They say that each parent (so John and Patsy) knowingly rendered assistance to a person (so it must have bean a third person, not each other - they referred to the word each before in that statement but do not do it here - meaning the only other person known to be in the house was Burke), knowing that the person (the third person referred before - Burke) being assisted has committed and was suspected of the crime of Murder in the First Degree and Child Abuse Resulting in Death.

I have read through comments on that many-many times and I see that some interpret it differently. So I do not dispute it. But, IMO, the wording of those indictments tells a story on it's own. There is no need for the GJ to be so specific with how they word those indictments, but they are... I think that there is a reason for that. And only reason that I can see is that Burke was a minor who could not be named or tried and they had to be careful to choose their words.

All my opinion again.

But I do think that the GJ must have hoped and wanted for it to proceed to the court where all the if's and how's that were left open for the GJ, could be set straight there. IMO
 
Tacking on: I do believe Burke knew more than he let on and hence the word "involved" (at some level of the coverup) is accurate, IMHO.

I go to the "garotte" - it served 3 purposes that night. I believe it was used by an *ADULT/S* in a very advanced sexual something or other.... (I do not believe a 9 yr old boy would be that sexually advanced to even have a notion of such things) (Nor do I believe that a 9 yr old boy came up with that as the final murder weapon of choice) - The "garotte" also served as the murder weapon, and it also served as a very convenient piece of evidence pointing to an intruder...

Yes, I agree. That points to an adult. And if they decided to go with the cover up and kidnapping, coming up with the whole "foreign faction" story that was able to behead their daughter, they needed the crime scene to "match" that story. Hence the "garrote" - a cruel device of torture that only a "monstrous killer from a foreign faction" would use, not the loving parents of the child. IMO
 
Thanks for clarifying that. I somehow too believed that the records are still sealed from the LE. Do we know who from the LE have had access to read and learn what those records say?

That is so unfortunate that the child psychologist did not get a second chance to interview Burke IMO. Especially knowing that she did have some doubts about things on her mind.

But the interview was conducted on the 26th, on the same day it happened and before Burke knew that JonBenet was already found murdered. If he at that time still only knew that JonBenet was kidnapped and he really did spend the night in his room without knowing about anything else, there is no need for the child psychologist to feel that Burke was somehow responsible for what happened to JBR. IMO. I believe that the accident part and the kidnapping part were two separate occasions in Burkes mind, not involved to each other. And he was not questioned about the accident. All my opinion.
Just for clarification, the interview on the 26th was with Det. Patterson at the White's house. And you are correct in that BR at that time only thought she was missing. He did not find out until later in the afternoon when he was taken to the Fernie's to be with the family and JR told him. The interview with the child psychologist took place on 1/8/97, a week after the murder and they had returned from Georgia and JB's funeral.
There is evidence that something bad had happened in JB's room before, as there was blood/staining found on her nightgown and bedding. That is a fact. But we do not really know time wise as a fact if it came that night, or maybe in the morning of 25th or when she was sexually assaulted before the murder. Unless we have some solid connection that the blood/staining found there is consistent with the mucus that was found and tested from JB's nose/mouth area. I don't think that we do, but correct me if I'm wrong please.
I do not dispute that it could not have started at her bedroom - of course it could have. But I have some doubts... Somehow I think that JonBenet did not make it to her bed after arriving home from the Whites, but it is only my opinion not a fact.
Yes, there was blood found on her nightgown, on her favorite white blanket and a little on her pillow. A pillow had been removed from her bed and was in the kitchen, which is kind of an odd place for a pillow to be. They also identified fibers from the cords used to bind her wrists in her bed. This all IMO points to things having started there before she was moved to the basement. A little bit of the green garland that was wrapped around the banister of the spiral staircase was found in her hair, which is a clue that she may have already been knocked out when carried downstairs. At some point in the basement, she is wiped down after the digital assault and her clothing changed. The white blanket is covering her which could be a sign of care from the stager(s) of the scene, which also IMO points to a family member. Her nightgown is left there next to her because the scene stager(s) wanted to make it look like everything happened in the basement and point away from anything having happened in her bedroom. IMO this was key for them being able to say they did not hear a thing that night.
And Patsy and John maybe too were actually truthful (hard to believe, I know) when stating that they never asked Burke if he saw/heard anything or had any discussions about that matter with him. Maybe they knew the answer already - if he stayed in his bed for the night there is nothing to ask or discuss. Maybe they even went and checked on him a few times during the night to see if he stayed sound asleep in his room. IMO.
In one recent article, a friend of Burkes did state that Burke avoids the topic of JonBenet and never talks or wants to hear about it. I do not know how credible that statement actually is, but still. Now, if he really is an innocent brother who knows that his family is innocent too - wouldn't he be there trying to fight for justice and be heard and seen too, like John? But he hides and stays quiet. And he was hidden and shielded by his parents through the years when he was younger. Since the day of the murder, and even from the police. Police, who is there only to help and to protect the family from the foreign faction and find the murderer of his sister. Why wouldn't he want to help to solve the terrible murder of his little sister if that is all that it is...
PR & JR's story about never having asked BR anything about that night is yet another clue of how odd some of their behavior was. He was the only family member who was on the same floor as JB was. Just as not thoroughly searching the entire house from top to bottom was odd. It could be just that's the way they were about things, but most parents who have discussed these aspects point out they would've searched high and low for their child, and they would've spoken to the only person who shared the same floor with the missing child. IMO it seems to point to guilty knowledge.....they didn't search thoroughly (if in reality at all) because they knew she was dead and in the WC where they had placed her. Did they ask BR about what he might've heard or seen though? They very well may have as they would need to know for damage control. And then to tell him he needed to stay quiet about what he may have heard. I think it's quite obvious there was at least a discussion at some point about the pineapple. His reaction when asked about that by Det. Schuler was very telling.

I also recall an interview with JR asking him about the timeline of that morning. PR had said, backed up by BR that she had exploded into his room that morning looking for JB who would sometimes sleep there after she had wet her own bed. What stands out to me is that PR was looking for JB, she wasn't checking on BR. JR then says that after he was (again supposedly) checking locked doors and looking around the house for JB, that he suddenly remembers BR, so he then goes to check BR's room finding him asleep, which we know from BR's admission that he was not. And again, BR seems to just be an afterthought. Now I get that at that point if they truly believed that JB had been kidnapped, she was the focus. But you do have another child......if there were people in your house that took one of your children, would you not have a concern for the other child more immediately? And again, IMO this likely points to their not being concerned for BR because they knew there was no intruder, no "foreign faction".

I think BR's subsequent shielding by his parents over the years has served to exacerbate his social awkwardness which we see in him when we have had the opportunity to observe him. We do know that he had a circle of friends when he was a kid living in Boulder, more friends than JB had. But he was also described as being quiet and at times could be quite introverted. He was very content being on his own with his legos and video games. I have also read that he has said it was difficult for him to know who to trust later on when it came to friends. Who were the real friends that protected his privacy, and who just wanted to get to know him to learn what he knew about the murder. His comment to the child psychologist about secrets is telling. He had secrets and he knew how to keep them. His father and his older half brother have taken on the task of being the squeaky wheels over the years so that he doesn't have to. I also think his attitude after the murder of "just moving on" with his life is very BR. And we saw all the backlash from the Dr. Phil interview and people's perceptions of him in the aftermath. Surely he is aware of that and what a disaster it was perceived to be. IMO he was coerced into that by JR and Lin Wood, I doubt very much that he wanted any part of that but they felt it was necessary to counter the CBS documentary that was about to air. I can only imagine that afterwards, he decided not only that it was a mistake but also one that he would never make again. BR is only comfortable in his very small and limited world, surrounded by the few people he knows he can trust, who don't ask questions and accept him for who he is.

Of course there is also the question of what he does know. Even if he has no actual knowledge of exactly what happened and who was responsible, he may have his own suspicions. Suspicions that would be very scary and uncomfortable to verbalize. IMO he probably just wants to let what's in the past stay in the past. Solving the case might just rip his world to shreds. Again. The child psychologist also noted that she thought he was protective of his family. I think he is also very protective of himself.
Now it is all my opinion and I respect Your theory and all the other theories that are possibilities out there. I do not claim that I know how it really played out... I only wish I knew. I wish we all one day learn the truth...

And it sure seems that he has been silenced. By his parents and most likely by the attorneys too. Never talk... But I do have a slight hope for a confession... although very faint, it is still more then the hope in the DNA.
I respect your opinion as well. We have some points that we differ on, and that's ok because none of us knows what happened, we can only speculate based upon what we do know which sadly, isn't all that much. And I think we all share the hope that someday we will know more. I rather doubt however that it will come from BR. But I do hope that after JR leaves this earth that someone else will step forward with what they know, after the ever present threat of lawsuits has been diminished.
 
That is a possibility and I quite often think about that too. But what bothers me with that is the exact wording that the GJ chose.

They say that each parent (so John and Patsy) knowingly rendered assistance to a person (so it must have bean a third person, not each other - they referred to the word each before in that statement but do not do it here - meaning the only other person known to be in the house was Burke), knowing that the person (the third person referred before - Burke) being assisted has committed and was suspected of the crime of Murder in the First Degree and Child Abuse Resulting in Death.

I have read through comments on that many-many times and I see that some interpret it differently. So I do not dispute it. But, IMO, the wording of those indictments tells a story on it's own. There is no need for the GJ to be so specific with how they word those indictments, but they are... I think that there is a reason for that. And only reason that I can see is that Burke was a minor who could not be named or tried and they had to be careful to choose their words.

All my opinion again.

But I do think that the GJ must have hoped and wanted for it to proceed to the court where all the if's and how's that were left open for the GJ, could be set straight there. IMO
I of course see your point and understand why you came to that conclusion.

My opinion differs in that I do not think that the verbiage necessarily points to a 3rd person.

The jurors have hinted very strongly that they believe both parents were involved. One juror came out and pretty much said that, but what they could not figure out was which one was responsible for what. That was something they hoped would be made more clear at trial with hopefully more evidence. IMO they knew that the killer was either JR or PR, and that they both participated in the cover up covering for each other. What they were not able to determine based upon the evidence presented was to identify which one was the killer.

And of course we have the two very crucial components of her death, which are the blow to the head and the strangulation that further complicates things because one or the other could've been responsible for either act and not necessarily both. I lean towards thinking the head blow was not intentional but happened in a moment of uncontrollable rage, I don't really buy that it was because of bed wetting though. But I do think that PR was capable of those kinds of moments, more so than JR who even when he had angry moments (which business colleagues and a housekeeper have described) was able to maintain control of himself.

I recall PR having to explain to a friend why she cut JB's hair when she was about 3 yo. She described constant fighting with JB on a daily basis about brushing her hair. For whatever reason, JB hated having PR brush her hair and she very strongly fought it. PR reached the end of her rope (no pun intended) and just whacked it off to a short bob. Impulsive and emotionally charged. And this was before her cancer treatment which threw her into early menopause.

Of course BR's involvement is not an impossibility. And as a minor, he was protected. What IMO points away from him though, are two aspects. One is that he testified to the GJ, while neither PR or JR were called. I think they were not called because they were the suspects, not BR. And after his testimony the prosecutors / DA announced in 1999 that he was not a suspect. IMO that was more meaningful that Lacy's ill advised pronouncement in 2008.
 
Just for clarification, the interview on the 26th was with Det. Patterson at the White's house. And you are correct in that BR at that time only thought she was missing. He did not find out until later in the afternoon when he was taken to the Fernie's to be with the family and JR told him. The interview with the child psychologist took place on 1/8/97, a week after the murder and they had returned from Georgia and JB's funeral.
Yes, you are correct - I somehow mixed up the detective and the psychologist in my comment. I know that the interview with the psychologist happened next year, and also in the summer of 1998 by the DA office, 18 months after the murder.
Yes, there was blood found on her nightgown, on her favorite white blanket and a little on her pillow. A pillow had been removed from her bed and was in the kitchen, which is kind of an odd place for a pillow to be. They also identified fibers from the cords used to bind her wrists in her bed. This all IMO points to things having started there before she was moved to the basement. A little bit of the green garland that was wrapped around the banister of the spiral staircase was found in her hair, which is a clue that she may have already been knocked out when carried downstairs. At some point in the basement, she is wiped down after the digital assault and her clothing changed. The white blanket is covering her which could be a sign of care from the stager(s) of the scene, which also IMO points to a family member. Her nightgown is left there next to her because the scene stager(s) wanted to make it look like everything happened in the basement and point away from anything having happened in her bedroom. IMO this was key for them being able to say they did not hear a thing that night.
That sure is an odd place for a pillow to be. And I forgot about the fibers, yes! That sure would link the crime to possibly be starting at her bed doesn't it. But if the head blow was an accident that may have started this all... and it possibly happened in her bed while she was asleep, how and why put the cord around her there? She was strangled to death in the basement so why not apply the rope there... questions, questions...
Or possibly the rope fibers got transferred there somehow? Maybe when they had already strangled JB in the basement and then Patsy went back to her room to get the blanket and the nightgown... touching the bedding and transferring fibers. We do not know...
The garland too. It could have gotten there when she was carried downstairs. But it seems to me from the photos that the height of the garland seems to be around the same height that JB's head would be if she stood up. It is also a possibility that she, while going up or coming down the stairs with her hair left open (not braided, just like it was when she was found) could have gotten the fibers from the garland into her hair just simply by walking there. Not impossible...

The blanket does point to care and love and I believe it was Patsy's doing. IMO. And John's claim about that she was wrapped in a blanket and he did not mean to hurt her goes with that... They just could not have left her there in that dark, damp room on a cold concrete floor...

I know I question a lot of things many here write. I hope I don't offend anyone by doing so. :) I don't do it to argue or claim that I know better - I do not. I just like to think of other options and sometimes find simple or innocent reasons for things that some may find as solid proof. I respect your theory and see it totally possible happening the way you describe it too.

PR & JR's story about never having asked BR anything about that night is yet another clue of how odd some of their behavior was. He was the only family member who was on the same floor as JB was. Just as not thoroughly searching the entire house from top to bottom was odd. It could be just that's the way they were about things, but most parents who have discussed these aspects point out they would've searched high and low for their child, and they would've spoken to the only person who shared the same floor with the missing child. IMO it seems to point to guilty knowledge.....they didn't search thoroughly (if in reality at all) because they knew she was dead and in the WC where they had placed her. Did they ask BR about what he might've heard or seen though? They very well may have as they would need to know for damage control. And then to tell him he needed to stay quiet about what he may have heard. I think it's quite obvious there was at least a discussion at some point about the pineapple. His reaction when asked about that by Det. Schuler was very telling.
Not searching the house again is, IMO, a sign of their knowledge of what was happening. I agree. They simply did not need to search the house. I doubt they searched the house at all. Maybe only to hide away evidence (like wiping the flashlight). But it rather seems a chaotic scene - if they had composed themselves and gathered their thoughts, they could have simply hidden away the notepad, pen, pineapple, flashlight and many other things that raise questions. Since they left many crucial things just lying around I believe they were too consumed with the cover up and how it would play out, not thinking clearly about what evidence they should have removed. IMO. But again there is a possibility that they left it all out for the purpose of creating a confusion... then it sure worked well on their behalf.

I also recall an interview with JR asking him about the timeline of that morning. PR had said, backed up by BR that she had exploded into his room that morning looking for JB who would sometimes sleep there after she had wet her own bed. What stands out to me is that PR was looking for JB, she wasn't checking on BR. JR then says that after he was (again supposedly) checking locked doors and looking around the house for JB, that he suddenly remembers BR, so he then goes to check BR's room finding him asleep, which we know from BR's admission that he was not. And again, BR seems to just be an afterthought. Now I get that at that point if they truly believed that JB had been kidnapped, she was the focus. But you do have another child......if there were people in your house that took one of your children, would you not have a concern for the other child more immediately? And again, IMO this likely points to their not being concerned for BR because they knew there was no intruder, no "foreign faction".
Yes, they were never concerned about Burke. Nor themselves. Strange since a Foreign Faction had just invaded their house and killed their daughter. I guess it wasn't a concern to them that maybe they would hurt them or Burke too. Even if they stated in the RN that they are watching and two of them are not particularly happy with John. Or maybe Burke was just an after thought for all of them... who knows.
If a child is truly kidnapped, there is no way a parent would not think about the wellbeing of their other children or themselves. I would be scared to death after reading such a ransom note. But then again, they said did not read it...

But if I think that Burke was involved, I see why they would want him to be out of the house and the presence of the LE.
I think BR's subsequent shielding by his parents over the years has served to exacerbate his social awkwardness which we see in him when we have had the opportunity to observe him. We do know that he had a circle of friends when he was a kid living in Boulder, more friends than JB had. But he was also described as being quiet and at times could be quite introverted. He was very content being on his own with his legos and video games. I have also read that he has said it was difficult for him to know who to trust later on when it came to friends. Who were the real friends that protected his privacy, and who just wanted to get to know him to learn what he knew about the murder. His comment to the child psychologist about secrets is telling. He had secrets and he knew how to keep them. His father and his older half brother have taken on the task of being the squeaky wheels over the years so that he doesn't have to. I also think his attitude after the murder of "just moving on" with his life is very BR. And we saw all the backlash from the Dr. Phil interview and people's perceptions of him in the aftermath. Surely he is aware of that and what a disaster it was perceived to be. IMO he was coerced into that by JR and Lin Wood, I doubt very much that he wanted any part of that but they felt it was necessary to counter the CBS documentary that was about to air. I can only imagine that afterwards, he decided not only that it was a mistake but also one that he would never make again. BR is only comfortable in his very small and limited world, surrounded by the few people he knows he can trust, who don't ask questions and accept him for who he is.
I agree 100%.
Something does seem a bit off with Burke. I'm not strong to say via television or transcripts whether Burke is odd/awkward because of the secrets that he has been asked to keep all of his life or is it something else. Some say that he seems a bit off the spectrum, maybe, I'm not able to say. I believe to make such statements you need to meet that person in person.
It could very well be the "burden" that he has had to live with his whole life. The secret(s) he has had to keep. The shame or guilt or fear... there could be so much. A murder of a family member, being guilty or innocent, is a traumatic event. But something does seem off... IMO
Of course there is also the question of what he does know. Even if he has no actual knowledge of exactly what happened and who was responsible, he may have his own suspicions. Suspicions that would be very scary and uncomfortable to verbalize. IMO he probably just wants to let what's in the past stay in the past. Solving the case might just rip his world to shreds. Again. The child psychologist also noted that she thought he was protective of his family. I think he is also very protective of himself.
I believe that he has connected the dots if he did not know or participate in the staging part. At first it is possible that he was sincere and innocent in his statements, not knowing what actually happened and believing his parents. But he had to soon learn about the injuries JB suffered. He remembers the accident - it is the secret he must keep and never talk about. No way he could have forgotten about it. Reading the Autopsy report or even the magazines or online papers - he must have learned that JB suffered a severe scull fracture and head trauma at some point.

Not hard to connect the dots - I hit her and saw her falling down. She was hurt, but my parents told my she was fine. I believed them at first, but was she really? I never saw her getting up or going to bed like I was told. She was kidnapped... but then found in the house, murdered. And she had a scull fracture right there where I had hit her - maybe she did not get up after all? Maybe I killed her by hitting her? My parents told me not to talk about it, it is secret. But why is it such a big secret, if she woke up and all was fine? Maybe it is not what they are telling me?

I see similar questions going through his mind. Maybe not when he was 9-10-11. But in his interviews when he was 11 and saw the photo of the pineapple you can see from the clip that he is nervous. His body language shows discomfort. That should not be there if he was sincere. I believe he started to connect the dots by that time... IMO
I respect your opinion as well. We have some points that we differ on, and that's ok because none of us knows what happened, we can only speculate based upon what we do know which sadly, isn't all that much. And I think we all share the hope that someday we will know more. I rather doubt however that it will come from BR. But I do hope that after JR leaves this earth that someone else will step forward with what they know, after the ever present threat of lawsuits has been diminished.
Thank you! I too think that thinking differently is helpful - I have read about ideas and theories that would not have otherwise crossed my mind. And seeing other possibilities, accepting them and debating on them in a friendly manner is eye opening, and necessary in a sleuthing community, IMO.
 
I of course see your point and understand why you came to that conclusion.

My opinion differs in that I do not think that the verbiage necessarily points to a 3rd person.

The jurors have hinted very strongly that they believe both parents were involved. One juror came out and pretty much said that, but what they could not figure out was which one was responsible for what. That was something they hoped would be made more clear at trial with hopefully more evidence. IMO they knew that the killer was either JR or PR, and that they both participated in the cover up covering for each other. What they were not able to determine based upon the evidence presented was to identify which one was the killer.
I understand that. But what bugs me about this is - could the juror(s) actually have been able to come out publicly stating that Burke too could have been involved in this crime? As I understand, they could not have done that. Because the law protected Burke(minor) and he could not be stated to be responsible for a murder or tried in court. Now, knowing that, could the juror have stated publicly that they believed that Burke was indeed involved? I see that they couldn't and that is why they chose the wording in their indictments the way that they did. They said that they believed that Patsy and John were involved, because it is true, but did not say a word about Burke possibly only because they couldn't say it.

And there is also a possibility that they could have stated out Burke's name publicly but still chose not to do it because if they have stated out loud that the third person mentioned in their indictment is Burke, that would have stopped the further investigation into him and prevented the case from going into trial. Case closed and no trial. But as they wanted to proceed with the case in trial, they could not have said that they believe that the third person is Burke. IMO

If they believed that Burke did not play any part in this crime, the juror(s) had the opportunity to state out publicly that they believed that Burke was innocent. They did not...

I hope you understand what I'm trying to say here...
Of course BR's involvement is not an impossibility. And as a minor, he was protected. What IMO points away from him though, are two aspects. One is that he testified to the GJ, while neither PR or JR were called. I think they were not called because they were the suspects, not BR. And after his testimony the prosecutors / DA announced in 1999 that he was not a suspect. IMO that was more meaningful that Lacy's ill advised pronouncement in 2008.
I wish we could know/ask from the GJ why they did not call out Patsy and John but wanted to hear from Burke. And Burke's friend too.

Do we know if it actually was GJ's decision to call out Burke, or if it was someone else's "push" (like Lou Smith team being there presenting their evidence, what was not a standard procedure)? I'm thinking if there is a possibility that it was a call that came from the DA's office (they had power over things as we know) to call in Burke and make it all play out so that he could be declared to not be a suspect later. I see Patsy and John happily agreeing to that if that was the case. Possibly just the Team Ramsey doing with their usual money and power over DA, in order to get Burke out of it. Possibility?

There just seems to be so many strings attached, that should not be there in the first place...

IMO
 
Last edited:
Yes, you are correct - I somehow mixed up the detective and the psychologist in my comment. I know that the interview with the psychologist happened next year, and also in the summer of 1998 by the DA office, 18 months after the murder.

That sure is an odd place for a pillow to be. And I forgot about the fibers, yes! That sure would link the crime to possibly be starting at her bed doesn't it. But if the head blow was an accident that may have started this all... and it possibly happened in her bed while she was asleep, how and why put the cord around her there? She was strangled to death in the basement so why not apply the rope there... questions, questions...
I think the head blow may have happened in JB's bedroom, but I don't think she was asleep. I don't think she ever was asleep. BR said she was awake and helped to carry presents to the homes of the friends they visited on the way home that night. He also said that when they got home she walked up the stairs by herself followed by PR.

JR's very first story about what happened when they got home that night, as told to two different police officers on the morning of the 26th, was that he read to JB after they got home and before bed that night. That story changed 4 months later when they finally agreed to be interviewed by police to JB being zonked. Someone realized that for the intruder theory to be believable (they were all asleep and heard nothing), everyone had to be in bed and asleep by 10:30PM. This was dictated by the approximate TOD and approximate time of the head blow occurring, after which it was estimated she was alive for 45 minutes up to 2 hours. JB was awake and had pineapple. And it's likely that JR by his own first admission, was with her in her bedroom. It is also my opinion that she was wearing the pink Barbie nightie as it had the most amount of blood on it. The white blanket was on her bed and it had blood on it too. The blanket was scooped up when she was carried downstairs.
Or possibly the rope fibers got transferred there somehow? Maybe when they had already strangled JB in the basement and then Patsy went back to her room to get the blanket and the nightgown... touching the bedding and transferring fibers. We do not know...
The garland too. It could have gotten there when she was carried downstairs. But it seems to me from the photos that the height of the garland seems to be around the same height that JB's head would be if she stood up. It is also a possibility that she, while going up or coming down the stairs with her hair left open (not braided, just like it was when she was found) could have gotten the fibers from the garland into her hair just simply by walking there. Not impossible...

The blanket does point to care and love and I believe it was Patsy's doing. IMO. And John's claim about that she was wrapped in a blanket and he did not mean to hurt her goes with that... They just could not have left her there in that dark, damp room on a cold concrete floor...

I know I question a lot of things many here write. I hope I don't offend anyone by doing so. :) I don't do it to argue or claim that I know better - I do not. I just like to think of other options and sometimes find simple or innocent reasons for things that some may find as solid proof. I respect your theory and see it totally possible happening the way you describe it too.
IMO a lot happened in her bedroom. Only the final garroting, digital penetration, wiping down and changing clothes happened in the basement. There was also a knife from the kitchen found in the utility room next to JB's bedroom. Both LHP and JR identified it as being a kitchen knife that was out of place where it was found. LHP said she had never seen that knife anywhere else but in the kitchen. And fibers consistent with the cords were found on the knife.

Then there's the odd two ponytail thing with her hair. In the last known picture of JB to be taken while she was alive, which was taken at the White's house earlier that evening, her hair is in one ponytail. The autopsy pictures show two ponytails, one beneath the other. What was that all about?
 
I think the head blow may have happened in JB's bedroom, but I don't think she was asleep. I don't think she ever was asleep. BR said she was awake and helped to carry presents to the homes of the friends they visited on the way home that night. He also said that when they got home she walked up the stairs by herself followed by PR.
Yes, and I believe Burke on that matter more than John or Patsy.
JR's very first story about what happened when they got home that night, as told to two different police officers on the morning of the 26th, was that he read to JB after they got home and before bed that night. That story changed 4 months later when they finally agreed to be interviewed by police to JB being zonked. Someone realized that for the intruder theory to be believable (they were all asleep and heard nothing), everyone had to be in bed and asleep by 10:30PM. This was dictated by the approximate TOD and approximate time of the head blow occurring, after which it was estimated she was alive for 45 minutes up to 2 hours. JB was awake and had pineapple. And it's likely that JR by his own first admission, was with her in her bedroom. It is also my opinion that she was wearing the pink Barbie nightie as it had the most amount of blood on it. The white blanket was on her bed and it had blood on it too. The blanket was scooped up when she was carried downstairs.
Yes, they had 4 months to learn with the help of their lawyers all that the LE knew and questioned regarding their involvement. They had time to think through what they should say or not say, and even knew what the police wanted to ask from them. Now, I can not call that an "interview"... it was a rehearsed script that was memorized and told in a way that was beneficial to them. IMO

IMO a lot happened in her bedroom. Only the final garroting, digital penetration, wiping down and changing clothes happened in the basement. There was also a knife from the kitchen found in the utility room next to JB's bedroom. Both LHP and JR identified it as being a kitchen knife that was out of place where it was found. LHP said she had never seen that knife anywhere else but in the kitchen. And fibers consistent with the cords were found on the knife.

Then there's the odd two ponytail thing with her hair. In the last known picture of JB to be taken while she was alive, which was taken at the White's house earlier that evening, her hair is in one ponytail. The autopsy pictures show two ponytails, one beneath the other. What was that all about?
If I may ask, what is your opinion, why could they possibly want to redress her? I'm just thinking along with you here. If she wore the nightgown that already had her blood on it - if I they wanted to make the crime scene to look and LE to believe that a "crazy monstrous killer from a Foreign Faction" came and murdered their child (thus the garrote too), then wouldn't a bloody nightgown on her point more towards that happening, than changing her into clean clothes and wiping her clean? It just makes me wonder, if they did that, why they possibly did that...

I think we have seen only that one photo of her taken at the Whites - the one where she is on the floor, looking into the camera. I can see a scrunchie on her on that photo (the same one that she was found with) but I can not tell if there is something else in her hair too or not...
Maybe there was a second one too, but it came loose and was taken off while she was playing, and later was put back on. Or maybe there wasn't.. I somehow think that it probably does not really matter. IMO
 
If I may ask, what is your opinion, why could they possibly want to redress her? I'm just thinking along with you here. If she wore the nightgown that already had her blood on it - if I they wanted to make the crime scene to look and LE to believe that a "crazy monstrous killer from a Foreign Faction" came and murdered their child (thus the garrote too), then wouldn't a bloody nightgown on her point more towards that happening, than changing her into clean clothes and wiping her clean? It just makes me wonder, if they did that, why they possibly did that...

I think we have seen only that one photo of her taken at the Whites - the one where she is on the floor, looking into the camera. I can see a scrunchie on her on that photo (the same one that she was found with) but I can not tell if there is something else in her hair too or not...
Maybe there was a second one too, but it came loose and was taken off while she was playing, and later was put back on. Or maybe there wasn't.. I somehow think that it probably does not really matter. IMO
I suspect that there was a concern that DNA would be found where it shouldn't be......in JB's private area. The underpants that we assume she was probably wearing (panties in her size) were never found. I also suspect that JR was probably the one to wipe her down and redress her, why he chose the size 12 panties is a bit of a mystery, but it could be as simple as they were in the basement so it was convenient. The rest of the "outfit" I just don't know. We can speculate that redressing her in warmer clothing may have been in the same vein as wrapping her in the blanket. Yet another unanswered question. They didn't 86 the nightie or the blanket which one would expect might be the smart thing to do, they kept them on and near her in the basement to make it look like that's where everything happened.

But IMO all of that points to it being a family member. Why would an intruder go to the trouble of redressing her? The whole idea of this mystery person spending all that time in the house doing everything that was done just defies imagination IMO.

The two ponytail thing may very well be nothing. Just like the accidental 911 call on the 23rd that people find suspicious might be nothing except just an accident as has been put forth. There are so many little details like that in this case that are head scratchers. Are they just odd coincidences or is there something to them? I've never heard an explanation for the pony tails. There may be one that was given, but I am not aware of it.
 
I suspect that there was a concern that DNA would be found where it shouldn't be......in JB's private area. The underpants that we assume she was probably wearing (panties in her size) were never found. I also suspect that JR was probably the one to wipe her down and redress her, why he chose the size 12 panties is a bit of a mystery, but it could be as simple as they were in the basement so it was convenient. The rest of the "outfit" I just don't know. We can speculate that redressing her in warmer clothing may have been in the same vein as wrapping her in the blanket. Yet another unanswered question. They didn't 86 the nightie or the blanket which one would expect might be the smart thing to do, they kept them on and near her in the basement to make it look like that's where everything happened.

But IMO all of that points to it being a family member. Why would an intruder go to the trouble of redressing her? The whole idea of this mystery person spending all that time in the house doing everything that was done just defies imagination IMO.

The two ponytail thing may very well be nothing. Just like the accidental 911 call on the 23rd that people find suspicious might be nothing except just an accident as has been put forth. There are so many little details like that in this case that are head scratchers. Are they just odd coincidences or is there something to them? I've never heard an explanation for the pony tails. There may be one that was given, but I am not aware of it.
Thank you for sharing your ideas!

I too believe that it must have been a family member. It just points more towards that if we look at the whole picture.
 
Though I have never had a strong opinion either way re the bedwetting rage theory, the redressing supports the idea of a bed wetting incident. Why deny there was a bed wetting incident in a child who is known to wet the bed? What was the need to misdirect attention away from a bed wetting incident that particular night?
Perhaps the important part of the redressing was the size 12 panties. If JBR had been assisted with bathroom wiping while at the White’s, another adult could have remembered she wore correct sized Wednesday panties. A pair of urine stained Wednesday panties were replaced with a clean pair, albeit many sizes too big. Who but PR knew there were some size 12s in the house? PR is the one who purchased them, no way JR knew or cared about panties.

Everything done that night was misdirection. An intruder did not need to direct attention away from himself.
My opinion.
 
Yes, I agree. That points to an adult. And if they decided to go with the cover up and kidnapping, coming up with the whole "foreign faction" story that was able to behead their daughter, they needed the crime scene to "match" that story. Hence the "garrote" - a cruel device of torture that only a "monstrous killer from a foreign faction" would use, not the loving parents of the child. IMO
If any kid has to grow up in that kind of environment, would it be plausible that on an unconscious or conscious level, they lived/grew up in fear? If you have knowledge that your sister was murdered by your parents and live amongst all the publicity and literally that event taking over your lives, wouldn’t you at some point have doubts about your own safety, at the same time carrying a very powerful secret?
IMO, BR must have sought out his own answers…there is just no way growing up, as he did, with computers etc, he doesn’t know everything from an incredible perspective? And to live with that among your peers at school, grabbing a burger, going out anywhere? My God, that is some kind of life. Pure speculation of course.
That is where my thoughts have been, regarding this murder, BR and what one could speculate the Ramsey family dynamic is now and all the 29 years past? For birthdays…Christmas? How would dinner conversation go? The entire family gathered at a table for Thanksgiving…everyone knows the secret, lives with the secret, is consumed with the secret…
Pass the mashed potato’s…?
MOO
 
If any kid has to grow up in that kind of environment, would it be plausible that on an unconscious or conscious level, they lived/grew up in fear? If you have knowledge that your sister was murdered by your parents and live amongst all the publicity and literally that event taking over your lives, wouldn’t you at some point have doubts about your own safety, at the same time carrying a very powerful secret?
IMO, BR must have sought out his own answers…there is just no way growing up, as he did, with computers etc, he doesn’t know everything from an incredible perspective? And to live with that among your peers at school, grabbing a burger, going out anywhere? My God, that is some kind of life. Pure speculation of course.
That is where my thoughts have been, regarding this murder, BR and what one could speculate the Ramsey family dynamic is now and all the 29 years past? For birthdays…Christmas? How would dinner conversation go? The entire family gathered at a table for Thanksgiving…everyone knows the secret, lives with the secret, is consumed with the secret…
Pass the mashed potato’s…?
MOO
Touching on FEAR:

(Read through Burkes interviews - it's in there somewhere, I can't cite it but I absolutely read it just a day or two ago)

Burke was asked if his mother storming into his room that morning, going "psycho" - his word, and her general demeaner that morning SCARED HIM?? He replied in the affirmative. Yes. Furthermore in that interview and the same line of questioning, he says he never got out of bed to see what was going on but rather stayed in bed "freaked out" - his words.

So - he DOES understand FEAR. As weird as he is, he knows what fear is and ascribes it correctly in that context. He also says he had a feeling "something bad" had happened. His words. So, he's fearful of what he's feeling and interpreting in the situation but he's also asked (somewhere, maybe not the same interview) "Are you afraid or fearful of being in the house where your sister was murdered?" - (Paraphrasing) - Basically the question is "Do you fear for your own life after knowing what you know?" (paraphrasing) Response: NO

Now how can you be fearful of one thing but not be fearful for your own life unless you know - there is no intruder. ? But then, if you know there was no intruder, and you didn't do it, then you also know that one of your 2 parents had to have done it - wouldn't you also naturally be afraid of them?? Which one of them was more likely to instill actual fear into Burke? Father or mother? Most boys would say the Father. Could the father have instilled enough fear in Burke to lie and contradict himself from a logic standpoint? Maybe. Sure. I don't think it was ever noted that Burke was showing "signs of deception" with those answers - specifically about FEAR.

So, if you're afraid of your mothers emotions and feel instinctively that "something bad" happened to JB, but then you find out she's dead and you're not afraid for your own life and are perfectly peachy with the knowledge that JB has been murdered - doesn't that point to *YOU* being the source of the "something bad" ?? Maybe. :)
 
Touching on FEAR:

(Read through Burkes interviews - it's in there somewhere, I can't cite it but I absolutely read it just a day or two ago)

Burke was asked if his mother storming into his room that morning, going "psycho" - his word, and her general demeaner that morning SCARED HIM?? He replied in the affirmative. Yes. Furthermore in that interview and the same line of questioning, he says he never got out of bed to see what was going on but rather stayed in bed "freaked out" - his words.

So - he DOES understand FEAR. As weird as he is, he knows what fear is and ascribes it correctly in that context. He also says he had a feeling "something bad" had happened. His words. So, he's fearful of what he's feeling and interpreting in the situation but he's also asked (somewhere, maybe not the same interview) "Are you afraid or fearful of being in the house where your sister was murdered?" - (Paraphrasing) - Basically the question is "Do you fear for your own life after knowing what you know?" (paraphrasing) Response: NO

Now how can you be fearful of one thing but not be fearful for your own life unless you know - there is no intruder. ? But then, if you know there was no intruder, and you didn't do it, then you also know that one of your 2 parents had to have done it - wouldn't you also naturally be afraid of them?? Which one of them was more likely to instill actual fear into Burke? Father or mother? Most boys would say the Father. Could the father have instilled enough fear in Burke to lie and contradict himself from a logic standpoint? Maybe. Sure. I don't think it was ever noted that Burke was showing "signs of deception" with those answers - specifically about FEAR.

So, if you're afraid of your mothers emotions and feel instinctively that "something bad" happened to JB, but then you find out she's dead and you're not afraid for your own life and are perfectly peachy with the knowledge that JB has been murdered - doesn't that point to *YOU* being the source of the "something bad" ?? Maybe. :)
I think it's normal that he could be both fearful while in the situation of his family freaking out AND being able to put in his perspective that he does not fear for his life in the house.
 
It is possible that they also had talked about it at some point later. Whether Burke himself started to ask questions regarding the kidnap/murder of his sister, or Patsy and John went to talk to him themselves at some point later.

I'd think that if Burke at first did not know of what actually happened to JB that night and did not know that his "accidental" head blow to her started the whole thing and is the reason why JB is dead, he later might have started to connect the dots and ask questions himself. And who other to ask than his parents. And Patsy and John had to answer those questions if Burke did the math and understood that he had hit JB on the head at the same location where the huge scull fracture had occurred, that has been stated would have killed her eventually. I believe that he at some point must have thought along the lines of - I hit her on the head hard and there is a scull fracture and a hole in her scull - she could not have survived it, could she? My parents told me she was fine after and went to bed, bud I did not see it happening - maybe they are lying to me about something? Maybe she died because I hit her?

If he went and asked his parents similar questions that would have indicated to them that he sees that he played a role in this, they had to think through what to answer. Lying about that in the lines of "No you did not kill her, the kidnapper fractured her scull" - would raise a suspicion - how did the kidnapper hit her in the same place that I know I hit her? So I see that at some point in his life it would not be believable anymore. Maybe a few months later, but possibly even a couple of years. he did not need to read the autopsy report to know about the scull fracture. It was talked about all over the news and written on the magazines and newspapers. He also had friends who could have talked about the case or heard other people talking about it. Many ways to learn about her injuries. Of course it depends how intellectually smart he actually is/was, but still... All my opinion of course.

But I think that if this was the case (and I really doubt that he has not asked any questions in those 28 years), John and Patsy had to tell him the truth at some point. Whatever that truth was to them. Explain it to him however they chose to word and reason it - to make him see and believe too that it was the only way to go forward after the accident. Possibly telling him that the CPS would have taken him away otherwise, or that he would have gone to jail. Something that must have made him believe too that there was no other choice.

But that would explain why Burke was not afraid of this happening to him too - there was no reason for him to be afraid of his parents if his parents only acted in his interest. They were and are only protecting him. He was afraid of the chaos and his parents emotions that morning and the following days, which is natural. But he was not afraid for his life because there was no need for him to be afraid. IMO
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
107
Guests online
543
Total visitors
650

Forum statistics

Threads
625,638
Messages
18,507,421
Members
240,827
Latest member
inspector_gadget_
Back
Top