Exactly. The notion that an "intruder" came in - through the window or not - and spent *HOURS* inside the home, leaving no fingerprints, nothing, is patently absurd. There was no intruder. The "unknown DNA" could be explained in so many innocent ways.
Remember: The killer is also supposed to be a crazed lunatic. Sick beyond sick. - That does not = "cool, calculated killer." - Those two things do not jive together. A "crazed lunatic" is not careful.
But for kicks, lets assume the killer was calm and calculated and VERY CAREFUL - IE: no fingerprints. If you've been that careful throughout everything, you'd have no problem and no worry in the world about simply opening one of the 942 doors and simply walking out. In fact - climbing through that window is infinitely harder to do while being careful to make no noise, not rattling the metal gate overhead, etc...... the notion of an intruder is nonsense no matter how you figure it.
The idea that someone was invited in - or that she was killed before they ever got home - is much more believable to me. Just MHO.
Invited. Or, “knew how to get inside”.
I noticed JR’s account of what they both took for sleep every night. He and Patsy.
Paxil and Clonazepam. JR also added Melatonin.
Some neighbor said that he saw dim light in the upper kitchen. Another one heard a child’s scream.
But no one heard it in the house.
The neighbors might be mistaken post-horrendous fact. Or, the parents might be bending the truth.
But given the structure of the house, could it be so that two adult, neurotic people take strong prescribed medications to fall asleep, plus, maybe have sleep apnea on top of it, and are zoned out? Then someone who knows the code or has a key walks in and brings the kid down into the cellar?
Is it possible that the parents, sleeping on the third floor and far from JBR’s room, could have not heard any scream (if there was one), being sedated?
Sounds spread in an odd way. I would like to know on what side of the house was the house of the neighbor who heard the scream?
I am sure that whoever did it was not a total outsider. The person did not break the locks. But that the person could have legal access to the house; also, reasons besides SA (never proven), “rage over bedwetting” (never observed) or “anger about pineapple”, is not excluded.
Anyone who could have access to the key (or made a duplicate), anyone who knew or could guess the combination lock password and mainly, anyone whose presence in the house could easily be explained if the parents woke up, can not be excluded.
I have a vague suspicion that the murder had more to do with the Ramsey’s money, not the bonus but the money in general, but I have no proof of it.
So we have: the father whose biggest fear is not to lose his position and prestige, the mother whose biggest fear was is same + concern over the well-being of her only left child, and the son who had “issues” but nothing unusual.
Then, we have a group of people taking care of their house with 104 windows. People who might have felt envious towards their employers, felt that “some people have it easy” and had access to the house. IMHO, they had the possibility.
And then, there were the Rs and the Ps relatives, coworkers of JR, maybe someone coveted his position, who knows? I don’t think they are major suspects, but we really don’t know if anyone had the access to the house.
What I want to say is, the Rs are the usual suspects, but having looked at the house, I think they may not be the only ones.