FL - Former President Donald Trump indicted, 40 counts, classified documents and obstruction of justice, June 2023, Trial May 2024 #2

[Simply Southern]

The cases against Trump should have gone to a jury-- they would have decided the outcome. Instead, since Trump was elected president, there was no way these cases could go forward. Mr. Trump has avoided accountability his entire life by using our messed up courts -he uses the get of jail free card every time. One thing he is good at is manipulating the court system.

I agree, Jack Smith has been manipulating the court and innocent people for millions of dollars for years. I do hope information is released, especially the interview with Biden on his classified documents, stored in an unlocked garage, and Obama and why they weren't charged.

I think we're going to see and hear a whole lot in the next 6 months. I've had my eyes on Jack for the past 20 years.

All my opinion...

 

[bestill]

I agree, Jack Smith has been manipulating the court and innocent people for millions of dollars for years. I do hope information is released, especially the interview with Biden on his classified documents, stored in an unlocked garage, and Obama and why they weren't charged.

I think we're going to see and hear a whole lot in the next 6 months. I've had my eyes on Jack for the past 20 years.

All my opinion...

Are you talking about the interview with Biden and Robert Hur said he was to old and incompetent to face criminal charges while he was running for re-election?

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-congress-receives-report-bidens-handling-classified-documents-source-2024-02-08/

I hope the video of that interview is released too!

 

[Simply Southern]

Are you talking about the interview with Biden and Robert Hur said he was to old and incompetent to face criminal charges while he was running for re-election?

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-congress-receives-report-bidens-handling-classified-documents-source-2024-02-08/

I hope the video of that interview is released too!

Yup and the Obama interview as well.

Moo … all elected officials have documents. I give the benefit of doubt.
When I packed up my office of 20 years, I didn’t personally go through every document. Much stuff was just thrown in boxes haphazardly. After 10 years of storage in my basement corner, during Covid, I did. Yup, there was stuff (copies/not original) that should not have been packed and I shredded. Nobody gives a hoot about old Outdated material, confidential or not.

Didn’t one of the astronaut secretly keep a moon rock?

All my opinion only

 

[Niner]

Some docket updates!

Dkt # Date Description
678 01/06/2025 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Richard Carroll Klugh, Jr appearing for Waltine Nauta as co-counsel. Attorney Richard Carroll Klugh, Jr added to party Waltine Nauta(pty:dft).

679 01/07/2025 Joint EMERGENCY MOTION with Certification of Emergency included.

680 01/07/2025 NOTICE by USA as to Donald J. Trump, Waltine Nauta, Carlos De Oliveira re [679] Joint EMERGENCY MOTION with Certification of Emergency included

681 01/07/2025 MOTION to Intervene or, Alternatively, to Participate as Amicus Curiae by Donald J. Trump as to Donald J. Trump, Waltine Nauta, Carlos De Oliveira. Responses due by 1/21/2025.

682 01/07/2025`` ORDER. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 1/7/2025. See attached document for full details.

683 01/07/2025 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE Elizabeth Jane Shapiro appearing for USA. Attorney Elizabeth Jane Shapiro added to party USA(ptyla).

684 01/07/2025 Second NOTICE in Response to Emergency Motion by USA as to Donald J. Trump, Waltine Nauta, Carlos De Oliveira

685 01/09/2025 NOTICE of Filing by Donald J. Trump as to Donald J. Trump, Waltine Nauta, Carlos De Oliveira 1. Exhibit A

686 01/09/2025 NOTICE OF APPEAL by USA as to Donald J. Trump, Waltine Nauta, Carlos De Oliveira Re: [682] Order. Filing fee $ 605.00. USA/FPD Filer - No Filing Fee Required. Within fourteen days of the filing date of a Notice of Appeal, the appellant must complete the Eleventh Circuit Transcript Order Form regardless of whether transcripts are being ordered [Pursuant to FRAP 10(b)]. For information go to our FLSD website under All Forms and look for Transcript Order Form www.flsd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms.

687 01/10/2025 Counter NOTICE by USA as to Donald J. Trump, Waltine Nauta, Carlos De Oliveira re [685] Notice (Other)

688 01/10/2025 Corrected NOTICE by USA as to Donald J. Trump, Waltine Nauta, Carlos De Oliveira re [685] Notice (Other)

link: https://www.docketbird.com/court-ca...g&db_uid=7a625759-6d03-4126-bc72-f84824ad2ab6

 

[Niner]

Jimmy Carter lies in state at US Capitol, with Kamala Harris holding eulogy – as it happened

Former US president’s funeral to be held on Thursday; vice-president also expected to lay wreath at ceremony

www.theguardian.com

Jan. 7, 2025
A federal judge has temporarily stopped special counsel Jack Smith from releasing his report into the two indictments he brought against Donald Trump, Reuters reports.

The decision was handed down by Aileen Cannon, the Trump-appointed federal judge in Florida who presided over his case for allegedly hiding classified documents, and ultimately ordered the indictment dismissed. Here’s more on Cannon’s latest decision, from Reuters:

U.S. District Aileen Cannon, who presided over the now-dismissed case accusing Trump of illegally holding onto classified documents, directed the Justice Department not to release the report until a federal appeals court rules on a request from Trump’s two former co-defendants in the case.

Lawyers for the co-defendants, Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira, who were charged with obstructing the documents investigation, moved late Monday to block release of the report.

Nauta and De Oliveira argued the report would improperly interfere in their case, which remains ongoing.

Smith led both the classified documents case against Trump and a second prosecution accusing Trump of attempting to overturn his defeat in the 2020 election. Both cases have since been dropped.

 

[MamaSleuth5]

Appeals court denies effort to block release of Jack Smith's final report on Trump probes

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has denied an effort to block the release of special counsel Jack Smith's final report on his two investigations into Donald Trump.

abcnews.go.com

 

[Niner]

Dkt # Date Description
- 01/10/2025 Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Order under appeal, and Docket Sheet as to Donald J. Trump, Waltine Nauta, Carlos De Oliveira to US Court of Appeals re [686] Notice of Appeal - Other Order, Notice has been electronically mailed.

689 01/10/2025 Defendant's MOTION to Stay Defendants' joint motion for further stay as to pending motion for injunctive relief by Waltine Nauta. Responses due by 1/24/2025.


link: https://www.docketbird.com/court-ca...g&db_uid=7a625759-6d03-4126-bc72-f84824ad2ab6

 

[Niner]

I am going to go ahead & post this - as it is getting a bit long... Just updates on motions filed, etc.

*Case Dismissed Only against Trump (@ am ET) - FL – *Donald John Trump (76/now 78) indicted (6/8/23), charged & arraigned (6/13/23) with 31 counts of willful retention of classified documents, 1 count of conspiracy to obstruct justice, 1 count of withholding a document or record, 1 count of corruptly concealing a document or record, 1 count of concealing a document in a federal investigation, 1 count of scheme to conceal & 2 counts of making false statements & representations. Plead not guilty.
Additional indicted & charged (7/27/23) with 1 count of willful retention of defense information & 2 counts of obstruction. Plead not guilty in filing of waiver of non appearance & released on own recognizance with no monetary bond (Personal Surety Bond) & no travel restrictions (8/4/23). Southern District of Florida (Miami) Federal Court
Count 1-31: Willful retention of National Defense info, Count 32: Conspiracy to obstruct justice, Count 33: Withholding a document or record, Count 34: Corruptly concealing a document or record, Count 35: Concealing a document in a Federal investigation, Count 36: Scheme to conceal & Count 37: False statements & representations.
Co-Conspirator *Waltine Nauta (41 or 42) indicted (6/8/23) & charged (6/13/23) on 6 charges stemming from special counsel Jack Smith’s classified documents probe, including conspiracy to obstruct justice, withholding a document or record, corruptly concealing a document or record, concealing a document in a federal investigation, scheming to conceal & making false statements to federal agents. Plead not guilty.
Additional indicted & charged (7/27/23) with 2 counts of obstruction of justice. No plea entered & released on his own recognizance with no monetary bond (Person Surety Bond). Southern District of Florida (Miami) Federal Court
Count 32: Conspiracy to obstruct justice, Count 33: Withholding a document or record, Count 34: Corruptly concealing a document or record, Count 35: Concealing a document in a Federal investigation, Count 36: Scheme to conceal & Count 38: False statements & representations.
Co-Conspirator *Carlos de Oliveira (56) has also been indicted & charged (7/27/23) with 1 count each of obstruction of justice, concealing records & documents & 1 count of making false statements to FBI. He is alleged to have asked what could be done to delete the footage. Plead not guilty (8/15/23). $100K Surety bond-out on bond. Judge ruled that, in the meantime, De Oliveira must hand in his expired U.S. passport within 48 hours. Southern District of Florida (Miami) Federal Court
Mr. Nauta & Mr. de Oliveira conspired to delete footage from security cameras after the Dept. of Justice issued a subpoena asking for surveillance footage of the basement where it said confidential documents were held. In the court documents, Mr. de Oliveira is claimed to have texted another employee who was the director of information technology that "the boss" wanted the server deleted. The documents allege that Mr. de Oliveira later met with the employee in a small IT room, told him their conversation should remain private, then pressured the man into obliging his request after the employee told Mr. de Oliveira that he did not have the authority.
Indictment: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653/gov.uscourts.flsd.648653.3.0.pdf
Trial was set to begin on 5/20/24 with Jury Selection has been put on Hold. Govt’’s Proposed trial date 7/8/24. Defense’s Proposed trial date 8/12/84 (for Trump & De Oliveira). And Proposed trial date 9/9/24 (for Nauta). (trial expected to take 2 weeks). Trial will be on Mondays, Tuesdays, Thursdays & Fridays.
Case was dismissed against Trump by Judge Aileen Cannon on 7/15/24.
Judge Aileen Cannon presiding. Special Counsel Jack Smith & Elizabeth Jane Shaprio. Defense attorneys for Trump are Todd Blanche, Christ Kise & Emil Bove, Nauta’s attorneys Stanley Woodward & Richard Carroll Klugh, Jr. & De Oliveira by Jack Irving.
Case & court info from 4/2/23 thru 7/12/24 reference post #677 here:
https://www.websleuths.com/forums/t...ice-june-2023-trial-may-2024-2.686530/page-34
7/15/24 Update: Order Granting Motion to Dismiss Superseding Indictment based on Appointments Clause Violations. U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon dismissed Trump classified documents case citing unlawful appointment of Special Counsel Jack Smith. See post #671 (article) here: https://www.websleuths.com/forums/...ice-june-2023-trial-may-2024-2.686530/page-34
7/15/24 Update: Per Spokesman Peter Carr: The dismissal of the case deviates from the uniform conclusion of all previous courts to have considered the issue that the Attorney General is statutorily authorized to appoint a Special Counsel the Justice Dept. has authorized the Special Counsel to appeal the Court's Order. Case will now go to the 11th Circuit Courts.
7/17/24 Docket update: [673] NOTICE OF APPEAL by USA as to Trump, Nauta & De Oliveira Filing fee $605. USA/FPD Filer - No Filing Fee Required. Within fourteen days of the filing date of a Notice of Appeal, the appellant must complete the Eleventh Circuit Transcript Order Form regardless of whether transcripts are being ordered [Pursuant to FRAP 10(b)].
7/18/24 Docket update: Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Order under appeal & Docket Sheet as to Trump, Nauta & De Oliveira to US Court of Appeals re 673 Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment, Notice has been electronically mailed. [674] Acknowledgment of Receipt of NOA from USCA as to Trump, Nauta & De Oliveira re [673] Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment, date received by USCA: 7/18/24. USCA Case Number: 24-12311-J. 7/24/24 Docket update: [675] Transcript Order form as to Trump, Nauta & De Oliveira re 673 Notice of Appeal. Final Judgement filed by USA. No transcript requested.
7/26/24 Update: As Special Counsel Jack Smith’s appeal in the classified documents case against Trump gets underway, a federal judge here in Atlanta has set a date for Smith to file his opening brief in the case. Smith must file his brief by 8/27/24. Trump’s attorneys then have 30 days to respond to that brief. Following that, Smith had 21 days to file a reply. If the appeals court rules in favor of Smith, then that would result in the reinstatement of the indictment against Trump & even conceivably the reassignment of the case to a different judge.
8/12/24 Update: Trump is set to sue the Justice Dept. for $100 million over the classified documents raid on his Mar-a-Lago estate, according to reports. Trump's lawyer Daniel Z. Epstein wrote in a legal memo that the raid showed a "clear intent to engage in political persecution" & also "tortious conduct by the United States against Trump." The FBI's raid on Mar-a-Lago took place on August 8, 2022 & hundreds of pages of classified documents were removed. As a result, Special Counsel Jack Smith indicted Trump on 37 felony counts, including willful retention of national defense information, conspiracy to obstruct justice & false statements. Trump pleaded not guilty to all counts. Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, threw out all the charges earlier this year, ruling that Smith's appointment was illegal. Smith is currently appealing that decision. Epstein is requesting $15m in legal fees for Trump’s Florida legal defense & $100m in punitive damages. Epstein’s paperwork is an administrative claim – it is not a lawsuit. The Justice Dept. has 180 days to respond before team Trump can move forward with filing an actual lawsuit. Also, the judge presiding over Trump’s classified documents case – who notably has issued ruling after ruling favorable to him – actually denied his request for a hearing challenging the legality of authorities’ search warrant against him, suggesting maybe it wasn’t so bad a search after all.
8/26/24 Update: Special Prosecutor Jack Smith filed appeal re the dismissal of Trump's classified records to the U.S. Court of Appeals/for the 11th Circuit. Summary: The Attorney General validly appointed the Special Counsel, who is also properly funded. In ruling otherwise, the District Court deviated from binding Supreme Court precedent, misconstrued the statutes that authorized the Special Counsel's appointment & took inadequate account of the longstanding history of Attorney General appointments of special counsels. Asked that case be remanded to Court for further proceedings.
See link: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.ca11.87822/gov.uscourts.ca11.87822.18.0_1.pdf
9/4/24 update: A retired federal judge is among those asking an appeals court to reassign former President Trump’s indictment on charges of mishandling classified documents case to a new judge. In documents filed with the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, two groups of legal experts& former government officials say U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon should be removed from the case. Former federal judge Nancy Gertner & two legal scholars, Stephen Gillers & James Sample say rulings by Judge Cannon & her numerous delays have raised “well-founded concerns that she may be biased against the Government’s case & unable to manage that case impartially.” They’re seeking permission to file an amicus brief. Gertner & the legal scholars were joined in the motion by the government watchdog group, Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Government (CREW). They say if the appeals court overturns Cannon’s ruling, it would be the third time it’s reversed her in “a seemingly straightforward case about a former president’s unauthorized possession of government documents.” They say Judge Cannon’s ruling ignored the “plain text” of the Appointments Clause of the Constitution which allows the Attorney General to appoint a special prosecutor. Her dismissal of the charges they say are “in clear defiance of binding Supreme Court precedent & the plain text of Congress’ statutes.” They’re asking the Appeals Court to reverse Judge Cannon’s ruling & to remove her from the case.
11/1/24 Docket update: On Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, No. 9:23-cr-80101. Brief of the States of Florida, Iowa, Alabama, Alaska, Arkansas, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah & West Virginia as Amici Curiae in Support of Appellees & Affirmance. For more info see link: https://www.myfloridalegal.com/site...v.-trump-fl-ia-multistate-amicus-as-filed.pdf
11/4/24 Docket update: [676] Pursuant to 11th Cir. R. 11-2 & 11th Cir. R. 11-3, the Clerk of the District Court for the Southern District of Florida certifies that the record is complete for purposes of this appeal re: [673] Notice of Appeal - Final Judgment, Appeal No. 24-12311-SS. The entire record on appeal is available electronically.
11/7/24 Update: Special Counsel Jack Smith is in active talks with senior leadership at the Justice Dept. evaluating ways he can end his prosecutions of Trump after he won the election. Smith is not going to wait around to be fired by Trump. Intention is to have the 2 cases (in Florida & DC) brought to an end before Trump takes office so they are in compliance with DOJ Office of Legal Counsel policy prohibiting the prosecution of a sitting president.
11/14/24 Update: Special Counsel Jack Smith has now moved to halt his Florida case against Trump, telling the 11th circuit to hold his appeal of Judge Cannon's dismissal in abeyance. Just as in DC, he says he will inform the Court of the result of its deliberations & if appropriate, file its reply brief no later than 12/2/24. The Government has consulted with counsel for the defendants, who do not object to this request.
11/19/24 Docket update: [78] The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals has GRANTED Special Counsel Jack Smith's next filing deadline until 12/2/24 so DOJ can "determine the appropriate course going forward consistent with DOJ policy."
11/26/24 Docket update: [677] Order of Dismissal from USCA (Certified copy). Appellant's motion to dismiss the appeal as to Trump only is Granted re 673 Notice of Appeal-Final Judgment.
1/6/25 Docket update: [678] Notice of Attorney appearance of Richard Carroll Klugh, Jr appearing for Nauta as co-counsel. Attorney Richard Carroll Klugh, Jr added to party Nauta. 1/7/25 Docket updates: [679] Joint Emergency Motion with Certification of Emergency included. [680] Notice by USA as to Trump, Nauta & De Oliveira re [679] Joint Emergency Motion with Certification of Emergency included. 1/7/25 Docket update: [681] Motion to Intervene or, Alternatively, to Participate as Amicus Curiae by Trump as to Trump, Waltine Nauta, Carlos De Oliveira. Responses due by 1/21/25. [682] Order. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 1/7/25. See attached document for full details.
1/6/25 Update: Lawyers for the co-defendants, Nauta & De Oliveira, who were charged with obstructing the documents investigation, moved late Monday to block release of the report. Nauta & De Oliveira argued the report would improperly interfere in their case, which remains ongoing. U.S. District Aileen Cannon, who presided over the now-dismissed case accusing Trump of illegally holding onto classified documents, directed the Justice Dept. not to release the report until a federal appeals court rules on a request from Trump’s two former co-defendants in the case.
1/7/25 Docket updates: [683] Notice of attorney appearance Elizabeth Jane Shapiro appearing for USA. Attorney Elizabeth Jane Shapiro added to party USA. [684] Second Notice in Response to Emergency Motion by USA as to Trump, Nauta & De Oliveira.
1/9/25 Docket update: [685] Notice of Filing by Trump as to Trump, Nauta & De Oliveira. 1. Exhibit A. [686] Noice of Appeal by USA as to Trump, Nauta & De Oliveira Re: [682] Order. Filing fee $605.00. USA/FPD Filer - No Filing Fee required. Within fourteen days of the filing date of a Notice of Appeal, the appellant must complete the Eleventh Circuit Transcript Order Form regardless of whether transcripts are being ordered [Pursuant to FRAP 10(b)].
1/9/25 Update: A panel of judges on the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, in a ruling Thursday night, denied an effort to block the release of special counsel Jack Smith's final report on his two investigations into Trump. The Eleventh Circuit, in its decision, declined to immediately overturn Judge Cannon's temporary injunction, instead ruling that the Justice Dept. can file a separate appeal if they want to release the report earlier than this Sunday, when Cannon's injunction expires. Attorney General Merrick Garland, in a letter to Congress informing them Wednesday that Smith had concluded his investigations, acknowledged that he was, at that time, barred by Judge Cannon from releasing the report outside of the Justice Dept., but that he intended to make Volume One of the report, regarding Trump's efforts to subvert the 2020 election, available to the public once he is "permitted to do so" by the courts. Garland, in the letter, confirmed that he plans to make available Volume Two of the report, pertaining to Trump's classified documents case, available to leaders of the House & Senate Judiciary Committees for closed-door review as soon as the Eleventh Circuit permits him to do so. "Consistent with local court rules & Department policy, and to avoid any risk of prejudice to defendants Nauta & Carlos De Oliveira, whose criminal cases remain pending, I have determined, at the recommendation of the Special Counsel, that Volume Two should not be made public so long as those defendants' criminal proceedings are ongoing," Garland wrote.
1/10/25 Docket update: [687] Counter Notice by USA as to Trump, Nauta & De Oliveira re [685] Notice (Other). [688] Corrected Notice by USA as to Trump, Nauta & De Oliveira re [685] Notice (Other). 1/10/25 Update: {no Dkt#] Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Order under appeal & Docket Sheet as to Trump, Nauta & De Oliveira to US Court of Appeals re [686] Notice of Appeal - Other Order, Notice has been electronically mailed. [689] Defendant's Motion to Stay Defendants' joint motion for further stay as to pending motion for injunctive relief by Nauta. Responses due by 1/24/25.

 

[ilovewings]

Appeals court denies effort to block release of Jack Smith's final report on Trump probes

The Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has denied an effort to block the release of special counsel Jack Smith's final report on his two investigations into Donald Trump.

abcnews.go.com

Aileen Cannon is slapped down again: she is a perfect person for Trump to promote! ( notice I did not describe her as judge Cannon because IMO she is so far biased towards Trump she is not acting like a legitimate judge)

 

[Niner]

Dkt # Date Description
- 01/10/2025 Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Order under appeal, and Docket Sheet as to Donald J. Trump, Waltine Nauta, Carlos De Oliveira to US Court of Appeals re [686] Notice of Appeal - Other Order, Notice has been electronically mailed.

689 01/10/2025 Defendant's MOTION to Stay Defendants' joint motion for further stay as to pending motion for injunctive relief by Waltine Nauta. Responses due by 1/24/2025.


link: https://www.docketbird.com/court-ca...g&db_uid=7a625759-6d03-4126-bc72-f84824ad2ab6

 

[bestill]

Not sure where this is going - Jack Smith has resigned from the DOJ. Jack Smith resigns

 

[ilovewings]

Not sure where this is going - Jack Smith has resigned from the DOJ. Jack Smith resigns

This was expected

 

[Niner]

Dkt # Date Description
691 01/11/2025 PAPERLESS ORDER as to Waltine Nauta, Carlos De Oliveira. On or before 10 a.m. on January 12, 2025, the United States shall file a supplement to its Opposition to Defendants' Joint Motion for Further Stay in Light of Ongoing Appellate Proceedings 690. The supplement shall indicate whether Volume One of the Final Report directly or indirectly refers, relies, or bears in any respect upon any evidence or argument relevant to any of the charges alleged against Defendants Nauta and De Oliveira in this case. If Volume One contains any of the foregoing, understood liberally, the United States shall so indicate in its public Notice and thereafter file a corresponding sealed, non-ex parte supplement with particularized details, by the same deadline. The Court understands the United States' representation that Volume One does not "mention Defendants Nauta and De Oliveira or their conduct at issue in this case" [690-2 p. 22]. The Court is also aware of Defendants' belief that Volume One "bears on this pending criminal case" [689 p. 2 n.1]. The following motions remain pending in this Court and have not been ruled upon: Joint Emergency Motion as to Defendants Nauta and De Oliveira 679 ; Motion to Intervene and/or Participate as Amicus Curiae by President-Elect Donald J. Trump 681 ; and Defendants' Joint Motion for Further Stay as to Pending Motion for Injunctive Relief 689. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 1/11/2025.

690 01/11/2025 Response/Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Further Stay by USA as to Donald J. Trump, Waltine Nauta, Carlos De Oliveira 4 Attachments

link: https://www.docketbird.com/court-ca...g&db_uid=7a625759-6d03-4126-bc72-f84824ad2ab6

 

[MamaSleuth5]

DOJ continues to press for release of Jack Smith's report on Trump investigations

In a series of weekend court filings, the DOJ continued to press for the release of special counsel Jack Smith's final report on his investigations into Donald Trump.

abcnews.go.com

From this article:
"Cannon, who last year dismissed the classified documents case after deeming Smith's appointment unconstitutional, had asked the DOJ for that information after the Justice Department, in a court filing Saturday, argued she had no further jurisdiction to continue to weigh in on the release of the Jan. 6. volume of Smith's report after the DOJ successfully appealed her initial injunction to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals."

 

[Niner]

Dkt # Date Description
692 01/12/2025 Response to Court Order by USA as to Donald J. Trump, Waltine Nauta, Carlos De Oliveira (filed: 01/12/2025)

694 01/12/2025 Defendant's REPLY in Support of Motion by Waltine Nauta re [689] Defendant's MOTION to Stay Defendants' joint motion for further stay as to pending motion for injunctive relief. (filed: 01/12/2025)


link: https://www.docketbird.com/court-ca...g&db_uid=7a625759-6d03-4126-bc72-f84824ad2ab6

 

[Niner]

Dkt # Date Description
695 01/10/2025 Acknowledgment of Receipt of NOA from USCA as to Waltine Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira re [686] Notice of Appeal - Other Order, date received by USCA: 1/10/2025. USCA Case Number: 25-10076-G.


link: https://www.docketbird.com/court-ca...g&db_uid=7a625759-6d03-4126-bc72-f84824ad2ab6

 

[MamaSleuth5]

Judge denies Trump's last-ditch effort to block midnight release of Jack Smith's final report

A federal judge has ruled that the DOJ can release Volume One of special counsel report Jack Smith's report covering his election interference case against Donald Trump.

abcnews.go.com

From this article:
"Cannon, who dismissed Trump's classified documents case, ruled Monday afternoon that the Justice Department can publicly release Volume One, covering Smith's election interference case against Trump -- but reserved ruling on whether the DOJ can make Volume Two, on Smith's classified documents probe, available to congressional leadership for review."

 

[Tricia]

Remember these obnoxious type ads that were everywhere on Websleuths? You don't want them to return right? Become a subscriber to DNA Solves.com, and you will not only help families get the answers they deserve, but you will help keep those awful ads off of Websleuths.com
Find out how you can become a subscriber to DNA Solves.com by CLICKING HERE.
If you want to make a single donation, go to www.dnasolves.com and pick a case you would like to donate to.
Do not comment on this thread. CLICK HERE to ask questions and to learn more.
Thank you very much.
Tricia

 

[Niner]

Dkt # Date Description
698 01/13/2025 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION in case re 679 Defendant's Joint Emergency Motion per 697 Order Reserving Ruling on Volume II and Setting Hearing and Briefing. Motion hearing set for 1/17/2025 at 2:00 PM in the Fort Pierce Division before Judge Aileen M. Cannon.

697 01/13/2025 ORDER DENYING EMERGENCY MOTION AS TO VOLUME I OF SPECIAL COUNSEL'S REPORT; RESERVING RULING ON VOLUME II; SETTING HEARING ON UNITED STATES' REQUEST TO RELEASE VOLUME II; AND TEMPORARILY ENJOINING RELEASE OF VOLUME II PENDING RESOLUTION OF EMERGENCY MOTION AS TO VOLUME II. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 1/13/2025. See attached document for full details.

696 01/13/2025 MOTION OF JEFFREY B. CLARK FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AS AMICUS CURIE. Responses due by 1/27/2025. 2 Att

699 01/13/2025 NOTICE by USA as to Donald J. Trump, Waltine Nauta, Carlos De Oliveira

700 01/13/2025 SUPPLEMENT to [681] MOTION to Intervene or, Alternatively, to Participate as Amicus Curiae filed by Donald J. Trump by Donald J. Trump as to Donald J. Trump, Waltine Nauta, Carlos De Oliveira (Emergency Ruling Requested)

701 01/13/2025 RESPONSE in Opposition by USA as to Donald J. Trump, Waltine Nauta, Carlos De Oliveira re [681] MOTION to Intervene or, Alternatively, to Participate as Amicus Curiae Response to Supplement Replies due by 1/21/2025.

702 01/13/2025 PAPERLESS ORDER denying President-Elect Trump's Motion to Intervene as to Volume I of Special Counsel's Final Report [681] and Emergency Supplement [700]. The Court has reviewed the Motion and the Emergency Supplement [700]. Consistent with the Court's Order Denying in Part the Emergency Motion filed by Defendants Nauta and De Oliveira as to Volume I [697], and in light of the United States' clarifications affirming the severability of Volumes I and II [692], the Motion to Intervene is denied as to Volume I and reserved on the balance of the Motion, including the alternative request for amicus participation as to Volume II. As indicated [697], the Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Superseding Indictment is confined to this proceeding [672], as is this Court's authority to enforce its own orders in this proceeding. The Court is therefore constrained to deny the present request for emergency relief, expressing no opinion on the merits of the arguments in the Motion to Intervene as to Volume I or on the United States' asserted urgency in releasing Volume I. Signed by Judge Aileen M. Cannon on 1/13/2025.


link: https://www.docketbird.com/court-ca...g&db_uid=7a625759-6d03-4126-bc72-f84824ad2ab6

 

[JennieM]

Donald Trump would have been convicted over 2020 election, says special counsel​

Report by Jack Smith says evidence ‘was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction’ had Trump not won re-election in 2024

Donald Trump would have been convicted of crimes over his failed attempt to cling to power in 2020 but for his victory in last year’s US presidential election, according to the special counsel who investigated him.

Jack Smith’s report detailing his team’s findings about Trump’s efforts to subvert democracy was released by the justice department early on Tuesday.

After the insurrection at the US Capitol on 6 January 2021, Smith was appointed as special counsel to investigate Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election. His investigation culminated in a detailed report submitted to the attorney general, Merrick Garland.

In it, Smith asserts that he believes the evidence would have been sufficient to convict Trump in a trial if his success in the 2024 election had not made it impossible for the prosecution to continue.

Trump would have been convicted over 2020 election, says special counsel

Report by Jack Smith says evidence ‘was sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction’ had Trump not won re-election in 2024

www.theguardian.com