I think Jackie F was better here than the ridiculous story Dan R had. I think it was pretty good, and certainly considering what little they have to work with. The evidence is so overwhelming. Sarah D was excellent. It's interesting that they are leaning into the state's cases against all of them, including Charlie. I think she is arguing that the state proved Charlie's guilt, but that does not mean that the defense here agrees that he is guilty. That's certainly an interesting dichotomy, although I doubt that will fly.
I always thought it was going to be a good defense for her to say she just did what her son told her so she wrote checks, etc. But I think all the other evidence is just too overwhelming. We would expect her to argue that she thought she was going to be arrested, so she was trying to leave, not that she was guilty and trying to leave. I love the little tidbit we got about her writing a script for the inmate to testify at this trial. This case gets more mafia like by the day. Hopefully that doesn't extend to the jury.